BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 115
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 115 (Budget Committee)
          As Amended  June 8, 2011
          Majority vote.  Budget Bill Appropriation Takes Effect 
          Immediately
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |     |(February 22,   |SENATE: |24-15|(June 10,      |
          |           |     |2011)           |        |     |2011)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
                    (vote not relevant)

           SUMMARY  :  Contains necessary statutory changes in the area of 
          transportation to implement changes to the Budget Act of 2011.

           The Senate amendments  delete the Assembly versions of this bill 
          and instead contain the following provisions:

          1)Modifies the provisions for repayment of outstanding loans 
            from transportation special-fund loans to the General Fund.  
            For loans derived from truck weight fee revenue, the repayment 
            would be as-needed and directed to debt service for 
            transportation-related general obligation (GO) bonds - 
            approximately $970 million in weight fee loans will be repaid 
            in this manner.  For loans derived from transportation sources 
            other than truck weight fees, the repayment would be as-needed 
            and transferred back to the transportation special fund of 
            origin - about $357 million will be repaid in this manner.  
            All loans would be repaid no later than June 30, 2021.  These 
            provisions provide General Fund relief in the 2012-13 and 
            subsequent fiscal years totaling about $1 billion.  

          2)Modifies existing statute for supplemental reporting each May 
            1 on staffing and workload needs for the California Department 
            of Transportation (Caltrans).  Each May 1, the Administration 
            summits a budget request that zero-bases the Caltrans Capital 
            Outlay Support (COS) budget, which is the program that 
            performs the engineering design and construction oversight 
            work for highway projects.   The existing report provides 
            detailed data, but not summaries of the relevant information.  
            This bill would revise the reporting requirements to 
            incorporate some suggestions by the Bureau of State Audits to 
            make the report more useful and informative.

          3)Allows California Highway Patrol's (CHP) data from automated 








                                                                  AB 115
                                                                  Page  2

            License Plate Reader (LPR) technology to be retained up to 60 
            days, and to be available for use in felony investigations.  
            Consistent with the CHP policy, this bill would prohibit the 
            CHP from selling the data for any purpose.  This language 
            relates to a budget action last year that approved a $2 
            million federal grant to purchase LPRs.  

          4)Amends the existing reporting requirements established for the 
            High-Speed Rail Authority (HSRA) in AB 105 (Budget Committee), 
            Chapter 6, Statutes of 2011, by adding three new reporting 
            elements.  The HSRA would also be required to provide:  1) a 
            public outreach plan for the Bakersfield to Los Angeles 
            segment; 2) a full analysis on options for the San Francisco 
            to San Jose segment; and, 3) a formal response and full 
            analysis of the issues raised in the May 10, 2011, Legislative 
            Analyst report on the HSRA.  These reports would be due 
            October 14, 2011, the same date as for the current-law 
            requirements for an updated financial plan and a complete 
            legal analysis of the revenue guarantee for a future private 
            partner.  

          5)Provides an extended period for the City of Santa Rosa to meet 
            its Maintenance of Effort (MOE) related to state funding 
            provided in 2009-10 through the Proposition 42 distribution of 
            sales taxes on gasoline.  Due to the recession and other 
            factors, the City of Santa Rosa does not expect to meet its 
            full MOE requirement in the two-year time required to spend 
            local funds on highways and road investments.  This bill would 
            provide four additional years to meet the MOE for 2009-10 
            without the city having to return any state funds.  Similar 
            flexibility was provided to the County of Fresno last year in 
            SB 524 (Cogdill), Chapter 716, Statutes of 2010.  
           
          AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill expresses the intent of the 
          Legislature to enact statutory changes relating to the 2011 
          Budget Act.
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :  This bill will provide General Fund relief in 
          the 2012-13 and subsequent fiscal years totaling about $1 
          billion.
           
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :   Christian Griffith / BUDGET / (916) 
          319-2099









                                                                  AB 115
                                                                  Page  3


                                                               FN: 0001241