BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                AB 135
                                                                       

                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
                        Senator S. Joseph Simitian, Chairman
                              2011-2012 Regular Session
                                           
           BILL NO:    AB 135
           AUTHOR:     Hagman
           AMENDED:    April 25, 2011
           FISCAL:     Yes               HEARING DATE:     June 20, 2011
           URGENCY:    No                CONSULTANT:       Randy Pestor
            
           SUBJECT  :    AIR RESOURCES BOARD MEMBERSHIP

            SUMMARY  :    
           
            Existing law  :

           1) Provides the California Air Resources Board (ARB) with 
              primary responsibility for control of mobile source air 
              pollution, including adoption of rules for reducing vehicle 
              emissions and the specification of vehicular fuel 
              composition.  (Health and Safety Code �39000 et seq. and 
              �39500 et seq.).  ARB must coordinate efforts to attain and 
              maintain ambient air quality standards, and is composed of 
              11members appointed by the Governor, with Senate consent.  
              (��39003 and 39510).  Six members must be appointed on the 
              basis of their demonstrated interest and proven ability in 
              the air pollution field and their understanding of general 
              public needs in connection with air pollution problems with 
              the following qualifications (and five members must be from 
              certain air pollution control districts or air quality 
              management districts that reflect these qualitative 
              requirements to the extent practicable):

              a)    One member with training and experience in automotive 
                 engineering or closely related fields.

              b)    One member having training and experience in 
                 chemistry, meteorology, or related scientific fields, 
                 including agriculture or law.

              c)    One member that is a physician and surgeon or an 
                 authority on air pollution health effects.










                                                                AB 135
                                                                 Page 2

              d)    Two members that are public members.

              e)    One member having experience under a), b), or c) 
                 above, or having experience in the field of air 
                 pollution control.

           2) Requires each state agency to consolidate its existing 
              staff functions relating to contract opportunities for 
              small business into a single point of contact for small 
              businesses and designate a small business advocate as a 
              liaison to small business suppliers (Government Code 
              �14846), and creates the Office of Small Business Advocate 
              within the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) with 
              various responsibilities.  (�65054 et seq.).

           3) Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (Government 
              Code �11340 et seq.), establishes rulemaking procedures and 
              standards for state agencies.  State regulations must also 
              be adopted in compliance with regulations adopted by the 
              Office of Administrative Law (OAL).  The APA, among other 
              things:

              a)    Requires every agency to prepare and submit a 
                 specified notice of the proposed action and make certain 
                 information available to the public (e.g., draft 
                 regulation in "plain English"; statement of reasons for 
                 proposing the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a 
                 regulation; evidence to support a determination that the 
                 action will not have a significant adverse economic 
                 impact on business).  (�11346.2).  The statement of 
                 reasons must identify each technical, theoretical, and 
                 empirical report upon which the agency relies in 
                 proposing the regulation.  (�11346.2(b)(2)).

              b)    Requires state agencies in proposing to adopt, amend, 
                 or repeal any regulation to assess the potential for 
                 adverse economic impact on California business 
                 enterprises and individuals.  In assessing the potential 
                 for adverse economic impact, state agencies must meet 
                 certain requirements (e.g., be based on adequate 
                 information concerning the need for, and consequences 
                 of, proposed action; consider industries affected 










                                                                AB 135
                                                                 Page 3

                 including the ability to compete with businesses in 
                 other states).  State agencies must also assess whether, 
                 and to what extent, regulations will affect certain 
                 matters (e.g., creation or elimination of jobs in the 
                 state, creation of new businesses or elimination of 
                 existing businesses in the state, expansion of 
                 businesses currently doing business in the state).  
                 (Government Code �11346.3).  OAL must return any 
                 regulation to the adopting agency under certain 
                 conditions, including failure to comply with this 
                 requirement to assess potential adverse economic 
                 impacts.  (�11349.1).

              c)    Requires the notice of proposed adoption, amendment, 
                 or repeal of a regulation to include certain matters 
                 (e.g., include specified information if there may be a 
                 significant, statewide adverse economic impact; 
                 description of all cost impacts to be incurred by a 
                 private person or business; statement of the results of 
                 the economic impact assessment).  (�11346.5). 

            This bill  :

           1) Commencing on and after January 1, 2012, requires at least 
              one of the 11 ARB members to be a current small business 
              owner.

           2) Defines a "small business" owner with a cross-reference to 
              that term defined under the Small Business Procurement and 
              Contract Act (Government Code �14837) (e.g., independently 
              owned and operated with principal office in California, 100 
              or fewer employees, annual gross receipts of $10 million or 
              less).

           3) Makes clarifying and technical amendments.

           4) Sunsets January 1, 2017.

            COMMENTS  :

            1) Purpose of Bill  .  According to the author, "Small 
              businesses are heavily impacted by regulations implemented 










                                                                AB 135
                                                                 Page 4

              by �ARB].  They don't possess the time or money that large 
              corporations focus on studying, understanding, and 
              complying with �ARB] codes."  The author believes that "AB 
              135 would fix the problem by representing the voice of 
              small businesses.  The member can serve as the liaison to 
              the small business community, ensuring the businesses' 
              concerns are heard by �ARB] while also encouraging 
              compliance of �ARB's] regulation for small business 
              owners."

            2) Background  .  Current law provides primary responsibility 
              for control of air pollution, other than from vehicular 
              sources, to local air districts.  These districts include 
              county APCDs, unified APCDs (two or more contiguous 
              counties that are part of county districts are merged), and 
              regional APCDs (two or more counties become part of a 
              regional district), and sets requirements for governing 
              board membership that generally includes members who are 
              mayors or city council members, or both, and members who 
              are county supervisors.  The number of members and 
              composition must be determined jointly by the county (or 
              counties) and cities within a district, with certain 
              exceptions.

           Control of vehicular sources is generally the responsibility 
              of the ARB.  The ARB is the state agency charged with 
              coordinating efforts to attain and maintain ambient air 
              quality standards, to conduct research in air pollution 
              issues, "and to systematically attack the serious problem 
              caused by motor vehicles, which is the major source of air 
              pollution in many areas of the state."  The ARB also has 
              responsibilities for implementing the California Global 
              Warming Solutions Act of 2006.  The ARB consists of 11 
              members, and 6 of those members must have certain 
              qualifications (  e.g.  , automotive engineering; chemistry, 
              meteorology, or related field; surgeon or an authority on 
              health effects).  The other 5 members must be board members 
              from the following entities:  South Coast AQMD, Bay Area 
              AQMD, San Joaquin Valley Unified AQMD, San Diego County 
              APCD, and a board member from any other district.  These 
              board members must reflect the "qualitative requirements" 
              of the other 6 members to the extent practicable.










                                                                AB 135
                                                                 Page 5


           AB 135 requires that, commencing on and after January 1, 2012, 
              at least one of the 11 ARB members be a current small 
              business owner.

            3) Support and opposition concerns  .  According to the National 
              Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) in supporting AB 
              135, "California small businesses compose approximately 98 
              percent of all businesses in the state.  They employ over 
              50 percent of private sector employees and are responsible 
              for three quarters of all new jobs created.  The impact of 
              small business on California's economic success is nothing 
              short of critical.  AB 135 recognizes this concern and 
              strengthens the voice of small business by designating that 
              one of eleven board members be a small business owner."

           According to Sierra Club California in opposing AB 135, "To 
              set aside a seat specifically for small business owners 
              would unnecessarily restrict the Governor's ability to pick 
              the best person for the job.  Earmarking a seat for a 
              particular interest would also invite other interests to 
              seek their own designated slots.  For example, if small 
              business owners deserve their own specified seat, then how 
              about the employees who work for those businesses?  What 
              about the community groups whose members are affected by 
              ARB decisions?  Rather than starting down this slippery 
              slope, the Legislature should avoid reserving seats for 
              particular interests."

            4) Trying again  .  AB 135 is similar to AB 2328 (Niello), 
              approved by the Senate Environmental Quality Committee June 
              14, 2010 (5-1); failed in the Senate Appropriations 
              Committee August 2, 2010 (4-5) and granted reconsideration; 
              and failed again in the Senate Appropriations Committee 
              August 9, 2010 (3-5).

           A general concern is that requiring one of these members to 
              also be a small business owner sets a precedent for others 
              who may want to be represented on the ARB such as labor 
              organizations, environmental justice interests, or larger 
              businesses.











                                                                AB 135
                                                                 Page 6

            5) Related legislation  .  AB 146 (Dickinson) adds one 
              additional member to the ARB with training and experience 
              in climate change and reduction of greenhouse gas 
              emissions, and another additional member from a district 
              within the Sacramento federal nonattainment area for ozone 
              in any of the bill's specified districts.  AB 146 will also 
              be heard by the Environmental Quality Committee June 20, 
              2011.

           Because AB 135 and AB 146 amend the same code section, double 
              jointing amendments will be needed to address this 
              chaptering out problem.

            6) Clarification needed  .  If the committee believes an ARB 
              member should have small business experience, then this 
              bill should provide that this new qualification may also 
              apply to one who has been a small business owner in the 
              event that a member may not currently be a small business 
              owner - and in some cases such a member may want to avoid 
              any conflicts while serving on the ARB.  This provision was 
              an amendment to AB 2328 approved by the Committee.  The 
              subdivisions and paragraphs of �39510 also need 
              clarification.

            SOURCE  :        Assemblymember Hagman 

           SUPPORT  :       Automotive Service Councils of California, Brea 
                          Chamber of Commerce, California Bus 
                          Association, California Dump Truck Owners 
                          Association, California Independent Oil 
                          Marketers Association, California Moving and 
                          Storage Association, California Small Business 
                          Association, Chino Valley Chamber of Commerce, 
                          Dale Bright's Auto Service, Downey Chamber of 
                          Commerce, Fullerton Chamber of Commerce, 
                          Greater Corona Valley Chamber of Commerce, 
                          Greater Fresno Area Chamber of Commerce 
                          Government Affairs Council, Industry 
                          Manufacturers Council, Long Beach Area Chamber 
                          of Commerce, Los Angeles Area Chamber of 
                          Commerce, National Federation of Independent 
                          Business, North Orange County Legislative 










                                                                AB 135
                                                                 Page 7

                          Alliance, Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce & 
                          Visitors Association, Regional Chamber of 
                          Commerce San Gabriel Valley, San Francisco 
                          Chamber of Commerce, South Bay Association of 
                          Chambers of Commerce, Southwest California 
                          Legislative Council, Specialty Equipment Market 
                          Association, Windsor Chamber of Commerce  

           OPPOSITION  :    Sierra Club California