BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 151
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 4, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                 AB 151 (Monning) - As Introduced:  January 18, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              HealthVote:14-4

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill expands an individual's ability to purchase Medicare 
          supplemental health coverage (Medigap) plans.  Specifically, 
          this bill:

          1)Adds premium increases to the list of circumstances qualifying 
            individuals to leave Medicare Advantage (MA) plans and seek 
            guaranteed issuance of Medigap coverage from the same issuer. 

          2)Allows individuals currently enrolled in MA plans guaranteed 
            issuance of Medigap plans from any provider, if the individual 
            has a circumstance that would otherwise qualify them for 
            guaranteed issuance of Medigap coverage but the company 
            providing the MA plan does not also issue Medigap plans.

          3)Makes technical, clarifying changes to conform state law to 
            federal Medicare law with respect to the types of Medigap 
            plans available for purchase.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Minor, absorbable costs to the Department of Insurance and 
          Department of Managed Health Care to continue oversight of MA 
          and Medigap plans.  

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  According to the author, seniors enrolled in 
            Medicare Advantage (MA) plans will likely face reduced 
            benefits or increased cost-sharing beginning in 2012 because 
            of a planned reduction in the federal subsidy paid to these 
            plans. The author states that seniors faced with this 








                                                                  AB 151
                                                                  Page  2

            situation, who would like to leave the MA plan to enroll in 
            traditional, fee-for-service Medicare program and purchase a 
            Medicare supplemental plan to cover gaps in the coverage 
            (Medigap plan), will not be able to, absent the protections in 
            this bill.  

           2)Background . Medicare Advantage plans are HMO-style Medicare 
            plans that combine Medicare Part A (hospital services), Part B 
            (physician services), and a range of other services, including 
            in some cases Part D (prescription drug) coverage. Individuals 
            currently have the option to enroll in these plans at annual 
            open enrollment.  Partially because of federal subsidies to 
            these plans, they are often able to offer richer benefits or 
            lower cost-sharing than traditional Medicare. 

            Traditional Medicare covers 80% of hospital and physician 
            services.  Individuals and employers often purchase Medigap 
            plans to supplement the coverage offered by Medicare. In 
            California, the Department of Managed Health Care currently 
            licenses and conducts financial oversight of MA plans, while 
            the Department of Insurance regulates Medigap policies. 

           3)Policy Context  . Insurance companies can deny an individual 
            access to a Medigap plans based on health status, whereas 
            individuals can enroll in a MA plan any time at open 
            enrollment. This increases the significance of expanding 
            guaranteed issuance of coverage for Medigap plans, as they are 
            often underwritten and there are presently only limited 
            circumstances under which individuals are guaranteed issuance.

            Because the Medigap plans have broader provider networks and 
            the premiums are significantly more expensive than that of MA 
            plans, the Association of California Life and Health Insurance 
            Companies (ACLHIC) has voiced concerns that individuals who 
            need significant medical procedures may seek to jump from an 
            MA plan to a Medigap policy for their procedure, and then 
            return to the cheaper MA plan, shifting significant risk onto 
            the Medigap plans without corresponding revenue.  

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081