BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 155
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 155 (Charles Calderon and Skinner)
          As Amended  September 9, 2011
          2/3 vote.  Urgency
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |52-20|(May 31, 2011)  |SENATE: |36-1 |(September 9,  |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2011)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:   REV. & TAX.  

           SUMMARY  :  Repeals and reenacts the statutory provisions 
          specifying those retailers with a use tax collection duty (i.e., 
          nexus).      

           The Senate amendments  delete the Assembly version of this bill, 
          and instead: 

          1)Repeal Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) Section 6203, which 
            specifies those retailers that are considered to be engaged in 
            business in this state and that, as such, are required to 
            collect use tax on sales of tangible personal property (TPP) 
            to California consumers.  

          2)Enact two new versions of R&TC Section 6203.  Specifically:

             a)   With the exception of minor stylistic changes, the first 
               version is identical to R&TC Section 6203, as it read 
               before being amended by AB 28 X1 (Blumenfield), Chapter 7, 
               Statutes of 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session ("Prior 
               Nexus Law"); and, 

             b)   The second version is nearly identical to the current 
               version of R&TC Section 6203, but modifies the provisions 
               imposing a use tax collection duty on retailers that enter 
               into specified affiliate agreements.  Currently, these 
               agreements only give rise to a collection duty if, among 
               other conditions, the remote retailer, within the preceding 
               12 months, has cumulative sales of TPP to California 
               purchasers in excess of $500,000.  This version, in turn, 
               would increase this "safe harbor" to $1,000,000 ("Expanded 
               Nexus Law").  

          3)Provide that the Prior Nexus Law shall become operative on 








                                                                  AB 155
                                                                  Page  2

            this bill's effective date. 

          4)Provide that the Expanded Nexus Law shall become operative 
            (and the Prior Nexus Law inoperative) on either of the 
            following dates:

             a)   January 1, 2013, if federal law is enacted on or before 
               July 31, 2012, authorizing the states to require sellers to 
               collect taxes on sales of goods to in-state purchasers 
               without regard to the seller's location,  and  the state does 
               not, on or before September 14, 2012, elect to implement 
               that law; or, 

             b)   September 15, 2012, if such federal law is not enacted.  


          5)Specify that the provisions of the Expanded Nexus Law are 
            severable.  

          6)Require the Director of Finance, on or before August 15, 2012, 
            to certify in writing to the Governor, the Senate Committee on 
            Rules, the Speaker of the Assembly, and the State Board of 
            Equalization (BOE) whether or not federal law has been enacted 
            on or before July 31, 2012, authorizing states to require 
            remote sellers to collect taxes.  

          7)Provide that for the period between June 28, 2011, and this 
            bill's effective date, state law regarding the imposition and 
            collection of use taxes, shall be administered and applied in 
            accordance with state law as it read on June 27, 2011.  

          8)Provide that this bill is an urgency statute and shall go into 
            immediate effect. 

          9)Add one joint author and one principal coauthor.  

           EXISTING LAW  imposes a:

          1)Sales tax on retailers for the privilege of selling TPP, 
            absent a specific exemption.  The tax is based upon the 
            retailer's gross receipts from TPP sales in this state.  

          2)Complementary use tax on the storage, use, or other 
            consumption in this state of TPP purchased from any retailer.  
            The use tax is imposed on the purchaser, and unless the 








                                                                  AB 155
                                                                  Page  3

            purchaser pays the use tax to a retailer registered to collect 
            the California use tax, the purchaser remains liable for the 
            tax, unless the use is exempted.  The use tax is set at the 
            same rate as the state's sales tax and must be remitted to the 
            BOE.  

          3)Use tax collection duty on any retailer entering into an 
            agreement or agreements under which a person or persons in 
            this state, for a commission or other consideration, directly 
            or indirectly refer potential purchasers of TPP to the 
            retailer, provided two specified conditions are met, including 
            the condition that the retailer, within the preceding 12 
            months, has cumulative sales of TPP to California purchasers 
            in excess of $500,000.   
           
          AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill imposed a use tax 
          collection duty on any retailer that is a member of a commonly 
          controlled group, as defined, and is a member of a combined 
          reporting group, as defined, that includes another member of the 
          retailer's commonly controlled group that performs services in 
          this state in connection with TPP to be sold by the retailer.   

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown  
           
           COMMENTS  :  As passed by the Assembly on May 31, 2011, this bill 
          would have amended R&TC Section 6203 to include the "commonly 
          controlled group" nexus provisions outlined above.  On June 28, 
          2011, however, Governor Brown signed into law AB 28 X1 
          (Blumenfield), Chapter 7, Statutes of 2011-12 First 
          Extraordinary Session, which, among other things, adopted these 
          provisions.  AB 28 X1 also added provisions that impose a use 
          tax collection duty on remote retailers that enter into 
          specified "affiliate agreements."  

          In its current form, this bill temporarily reverts California's 
          use tax nexus laws to the way they read prior to being amended 
          by AB 28 X1.  The Expanded Nexus Law, in turn, would go into 
          effect on either September 15, 2012, or January 1, 2013, 
          depending on whether or not the federal government acts to 
          authorize states to compel remote vendors to collect use taxes.  

           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    M. David Ruff / REV. & TAX. / (916) 
          319-2098 








                                                                  AB 155
                                                                  Page  4

                                                                FN: 0002901