BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 212
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 3, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Mike Feuer, Chair
AB 212 (Beall) - As Amended: March 29, 2011
PROPOSED CONSENT
SUBJECT : California Fostering Connections to Success Act
KEY ISSUE : SHOULD TECHNICAL AND CLARIFYING CHANGES BE MADE TO
THE California Fostering Connections to Success Act of 2010 TO
HELP ENSURE ITS SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION?
FISCAL EFFECT : As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal.
SYNOPSIS
AB 12 (Beall & Bass) Chap. 559, Stats. 2010, a landmark piece of
child welfare legislation, opted California into two key
provisions of the federal Fostering Connections to Success and
Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008: (1) Re-enacting California's
existing state and county-funded Kin-GAP program to align it
with new federal requirements and allow the state to bring
federal financial participation into our kinship guardian
assistance program for the first time; and (2) providing
transitional foster care support to qualifying foster youth ages
18 to 21, phased-in over three years, beginning in 2012. The
goal of AB 12 is to assist foster youth in their transition to
adulthood by providing them with the opportunity to create a
case plan tailored to their individual needs, which charts the
course towards independence through incremental levels of
responsibility. This bill makes technical and clarifying
changes to AB 12 in order to help ensure its successful
implementation. This bill passed out of the Assembly Human
Services Committee on a unanimous vote. The bill is supported
by, among others, child advocacy organizations, counties, and
labor. There is no known opposition to this bill.
SUMMARY : Makes various technical and clarifying changes to the
California Fostering Connections to Success Act of 2010.
Specifically, this bill :
1)Exempts parents from referral by the county child welfare
department to the local child support agency for the payment
AB 212
Page 2
of child support on behalf of an adult, nonminor dependent in
foster care.
2)Makes technical changes to replace the phrase "period of trial
departure" with "period of trial independence" as defined in
law.
3)Clarifies that the juvenile court shall order a hearing
following a petition to resume dependency provided the
following criteria apply to the nonminor:
a) He or she was previously under the juvenile court
jurisdiction and was granted a trial independence which has
not expired;
b) He or she intends to satisfy at least one of the
required work, education, or medical condition-related
criteria enumerated under #3 of existing law, below; and
c) He or she wants assistance with either maintaining or
securing appropriate housing or is in need of immediate
placement and agrees to supervised placement pursuant to
the mutual agreement.
4)Clarifies that rules of court required to be adopted by the
Judicial Council shall accommodate the option for a nonminor
dependent to appear in court telephonically in any proceeding
in which the nonminor dependent is a party and he or she opts
for a telephonic appearance.
5)Adds the following documents and services to the existing list
of information, services and documents that must be provided
to a nonminor dependent prior to the termination of the
court's jurisdiction:
a) An Advance Health Care Directive, pursuant to federal
law;
b) The Judicial Council form required for a nonminor youth
to petition to resume dependency jurisdiction and reenter
care and, if requested, assistance in filing the petition;
and,
c) The nonminor's written 90-day transition plan.
6)Conforms delinquency statutes related to the termination of
parental rights to include the required guardianship study
found in parallel dependency statutes.
AB 212
Page 3
7)Distinguishes between the case plan update and mutual
agreement terms required for a nonminor dependent under the
supervision of the child welfare agency and a nonminor Kinship
Guardianship Assistance Payment (Kin-GAP) or Adoption
Assistance Program (AAP) recipient.
8)Restores, after January 1, 2012, the ability for an otherwise
eligible youth placed with a relative guardian prior to age
16, to continue receiving Kinship Guardian Assistance Payment
(Kin-GAP) program assistance after age 18, until the youth
reaches age 19, provided the youth is reasonably likely to
receive their high school diploma or equivalent degree before
age 19.
EXISTING LAW :
1)Establishes the California Fostering Connections to Success
Act of 2010 which, among other provisions:
a) Provides for the extension of transitional foster care
to eligible youth up to age 19 in 2012, age 20 in 2013, and
upon appropriation by the Legislature, age 21 in 2014 as a
voluntary program for youth who meet specified work and
education participation criteria; and,
b) Requires changes to the Kin-GAP program in order to
allow for federal financial participation in the program.
(AB 12 (Beall), Chap. 559, Stats. 2010.)
2)Defines a "nonminor dependent" as, on or after January 1,
2012, a current or former foster child between the ages of 18
and 21 who is in foster care under the responsibility of the
county welfare department, county probation department, or an
Indian tribe and is participating in a transitional
independent living plan. (Welfare & institutions Code Section
11400. Unless states otherwise, all further statutory
references are to that code.)
3)Provides that a nonminor ages 18-21 shall continue to receive
foster care assistance under certain conditions, including
that the nonminor is otherwise eligible for AFDC-FC benefits,
has signed a mutual agreement, and one or more of the
following conditions exist:
a) The nonminor is working toward their high school
education or an equivalent credential.
AB 212
Page 4
b) The nonminor is enrolled in a postsecondary institution
or vocational education program.
c) The nonminor is participating in a program or activity
designed to promote or remove barriers to employment.
d) The nonminor is employed for at least 80 hours per
month.
e) The nonminor is incapable of doing any of the activities
described in (a) through (d) above, due to a medical
condition, and that incapability is supported by regularly
updated information in the case plan of the nonminor.
(Section 11403.)
4)Defines, on or after January 2, 2012, a "period of trial
independence," as a period of no more than six months, unless
authorized by the juvenile court, during which the court may
terminate and subsequently resume jurisdiction and Title IV-E
foster care benefits to an otherwise eligible nonminor
dependent. (Section 11400; Section 1356.21 of Title 45 of the
Code of Federal Regulations.)
5)Requires, in certain circumstances, parents of foster children
to make child support payments upon referral by the county
child welfare department to the local child support agency.
Provides for an exception to be made when the referral to the
local child support agency would compromise the stability of
the child's permanent placement plan with a relative caregiver
receiving Kin-GAP. (Family Code Section 17552.)
6)Requires the Judicial Council to adopt court rules by January
1, 2012 in order to allow a nonminor dependent to appear
telephonically in juvenile court proceedings related to a
petition to reenter foster care following a trial period of
independence. (Section 388.)
7)Defines a "mutual agreement" as an agreement of consent for
placement in a supervised setting between a minor or nonminor
dependent and the placing agency that, in the case of a
nonminor dependent, documents the continued need for
supervised out-of-home placement and the agreement between the
nonminor and the social worker or probation officer to work
together to facilitate implementation of the mutually
developed supervised placement agreement and transitional
living plan. (Section 11403.)
8)Requires states, under federal law, to develop a transition
AB 212
Page 5
plan with foster youth, addressing specified outcome areas 90
days prior to emancipation, and to include information about
the importance of designating someone to make health care
treatment decisions on behalf of the child in addition to the
option of a health care power of attorney, health care proxy,
or similar document. (Public Law 110-148, P.L. 110-351.)
COMMENTS : This bill makes technical and clarifying changes to
the California Fostering Connections to Success Act in order to
help ensure its successful implementation.
California Fostering Connections to Success Act : AB 12 (Beall &
Bass) Chap. 559, Stats. 2010, was a landmark piece of child
welfare legislation in California opting the state into two
provisions of the federal Fostering Connections to Success and
Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 (Fostering Connections Act).
Specifically, the California Fostering Connections to Success
Act:
1)Re-enacted California's existing state and county-funded
Kin-GAP program to align it with new federal requirements and
allow the state to bring federal financial participation into
our kinship guardian assistance program for the first time;
and,
2)Provides transitional foster care support to qualifying foster
youth ages 18 to 21, phased-in over three years, beginning in
2012.
The goal of AB 12 is to assist foster youth, or "nonminor
dependents" as they are referred to in statute, in their
transition to adulthood by providing them with the opportunity
to create a case plan alongside their case worker tailored to
their individual needs, which charts the course towards
independence through incremental levels of responsibility. It
is a voluntary program grounded in evidence of how the option of
continued support to age 21 can counter the dismal outcomes
faced by youth who are forced to leave the foster care system at
age 18, including high rates of homelessness, incarceration,
reliance on public assistance, teen pregnancy, and low rates of
high school and postsecondary graduation. In essence, AB 12
seeks to mirror the type of continued guidance and assistance
most young adults receive from their parents and families in
their late teens and early twenties. Following this paradigm,
AB 12 provides nonminors with the option to petition to reenter
care if they opt out of extended care and want to return before
AB 212
Page 6
age 21, provided they meet the eligibility criteria set forth in
federal and state law.
In order to be eligible to continue foster care benefits up to
age 21, a nonminor dependent youth must: continue under the
jurisdiction of the juvenile court; sign a mutual agreement
which commits both the nonminor and the placing agency to
certain responsibilities; reside in an approved, supervised
placement; work alongside their caseworker to prepare and
participate in their transitional independent living case plan;
and have their status reviewed every six months. In addition,
pursuant to the federal Fostering Connections Act, a youth must
meet one of five work or education-related eligibility criteria:
1)Is completing secondary education or a program leading to an
equivalent credential.
2)Is enrolled in an institution which provides postsecondary or
vocational education.
3)Is participating in a program or activity designed to promote,
or remove barriers to employment.
4)Is employed for at least 80 hours per month.
5)Is incapable of doing any of the activities described above
due to a medical condition.
AB 12 will require the Department of Social Services (DSS) to
amend its existing Title IV-E State Plan to extend benefits to
nonminor dependents up to age 21. The extension will apply to
all Title IV-E eligible populations, including otherwise
eligible dependents and delinquents in foster care as well as
youth in the new federally and state funded Kin-GAP, and
Adoption Assistance Program (AAP); however, youth must have
entered the Kin-GAP or Adoption Assistance (AAP) programs at age
16 or older in order to be eligible for extended benefits. DSS
estimates an average of nine cases per year will enter the
Kin-GAP program at age 16 or older.
Pursuant to federal law, AB 12 also authorizes a youth with a
disability in a Kin-GAP placement to receive extended benefits
to age 21 regardless of the age of entry into Kin-GAP effective
January 1, 2011, as is currently authorized in AAP for children
with disabilities.
This bill makes amendments to the California Fostering
Connections to Success Act necessary for its successful
implementation : The implementation of extended benefits under
AB 212
Page 7
AB 12, which was delayed until January 1, 2012 and gradually
phased in over the course of three years, was intended to
provide the courts and DSS with sufficient time to develop the
rules of court, instructions to counties, and regulations needed
to implement AB 12, with input from stakeholders. It also
allows the Legislature time to make necessary technical and
clarifying amendments to the California Fostering Connections to
Success Act. Write the author:
AB 212 provides technical clean-up to AB 12. Despite
the two years of work by nine sponsor organizations
and two authors, this lengthy and significant policy
change invariably will require technical and
clarifying changes in order to be implemented
correctly. This bill reflects a continued
collaboration between the nine sponsor organizations
that worked on AB 12, along with our partners
responsible for implementation of AB 12 to ensure the
law is properly implemented.
AB 212 is intended to address issues already
identified, as well as any that may be identified
during the process of developing regulations along the
course of this year.
For example, AB 12 inadvertently removed a provision existing
long before the passage of AB 12 and commonly referred to as the
"high school completion rule" for those youth placed in Kin-GAP
placements before the age of 16. The federal Foster Connections
Act restricts transitional foster care eligibility to those
children placed with relative guardians after age 16. AB 12
included this exclusion, but did not continue the high school
completion rule for those children placed with relative
guardians prior to age 16 as previously provided under state
law. This bill corrects this omission by restoring the high
school completion rule for this narrow group of youth.
In addition, technical changes are required to consistently
refer to the reentry provisions of AB 12 as a "trial
independence," rather than a "trial period of departure."
According to the author, versions of AB 12 drafted prior to the
release of federal guidance referred to the reentry provision
included in AB 12 as a "trial period of departure." Nearing the
end of the California legislative session, however, on July 9,
2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services'
AB 212
Page 8
Administration on Children, Youth and Families' released a
Program Instruction (ACYF-CB-PI-10-11) related to the federal
Fostering Connections Act which outlined for states the
appropriate mechanisms and references for various aspects of the
federal law, including the following guidance related to reentry
provisions like the one found in AB 12:
A title IV-E agency should follow existing Federal
policy with regard to when to consider a child/youth
as remaining in foster care versus when a break has
occurred that warrants a new determination of title
IV-E eligibility with new judicial determinations or a
new voluntary placement agreement (see CWPM 8.3A.4,
8.3A.10 and 8.3C.5). A title IV-E agency is not
required to reestablish judicial determinations
related to contrary to the welfare or reasonable
efforts for a youth age 18 or older whose departure
from foster care is consistent with 45 CFR 1356.21(e)?
Similarly, if a court order authorized the youth's
trial independence �emphasis added] for a year after
the youth's 18th birthday, title IV-E foster care
maintenance payments may be made if the youth is
otherwise eligible when returning to foster care
during that year.
Following the release of this guidance, AB 12 was amended to
accurately reference a "period of trial independence," but not
all the references to the "trial period of departure" were
amended. This bill corrects those omissions for consistency with
existing state and federal laws.
Furthermore, according to the author, due to concerns stemming
from advocates and courts that courts may interpret language in
Section 388 to require a nonminor to demonstrate that he or she
already meets one of the allowable five work or education
participation criteria set forth in federal and state law at the
time the petition for reentry is filed, this bill clarifies the
intent of the California Fostering Connections to Success Act.
According to the author: "Consistent with the concept that
transitional foster care assistance is designed to prepare
foster youth for adulthood by providing additional supports for
them to pursue educational and work-related goals, a youth
should not necessarily already be enrolled in school or have a
job in order to restart this assistance, but rather be able and
express their intention to comply with the eligibility
AB 212
Page 9
standards."
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The Judicial Council, one of the AB 12
sponsors, writes in support of this bill:
The Judicial Council supports AB 212 because it will
ensure that the council's intent in co-sponsoring AB
12 will be carried out by enacting those technical and
clarifying changes that are required to implement the
provisions contained in AB 12. AB 12 was a voluminous
and complicated bill that amended numerous sections of
the Welfare and Institutions Code regarding dependent
and delinquent youth. It also contained an
implementation delay to allow for stakeholders,
including the juvenile courts, to prepare for
implementation of the major policy change in the
legislation - extension of foster care to age 21. As
implementation efforts have begun, it has become
apparent that there is a need to clarify and correct
numerous provisions modified or added by AB 12 to
ensure that they can be implemented as intended. All
of the provisions currently in AB 212 are designed to
fulfill that objective.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
Alliance for Children's Rights (co-sponsor)
Children's Law Center of Los Angeles (co-sponsor)
County Welfare Directors Association of California (co-sponsor)
Service Employees International Union (co-sponsor)
Advancement Project
Aspiranet
California Alliance of Child and Family Services
California Coalition for Youth
California Probation Parole and Correctional Association
California State Association of Counties
City and County of San Francisco
County of San Bernardino
Family Law Section of the State Bar
Judicial Council
Junior League of Napa-Sonoma
Legal Services for Prisoners with Children
AB 212
Page 10
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by : Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334