BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 226
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   March 30, 2011

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON INSURANCE
                                 Jose Solorio, Chair
                 AB 226 (Solorio) - As Introduced:  February 2, 2011
           
          SUBJECT  :   Unemployment Insurance Fund: status report

           SUMMARY  :   Requires the Employment Development Department (EDD), 
          as part of a regular report, to estimate the changes in the 
          taxable wage ceiling or tax rates necessary to return the 
          Unemployment Insurance (UI) Fund to solvency.  Specifically, 
           this bill  requires that whenever the UI Fund contains a negative 
          balance, the EDD shall include in the status report on the UI 
          Fund an estimate of the change in the taxable wage ceiling or 
          tax rates necessary to return this fund to solvency within five 
          years.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires the Employment Development Department (EDD) to report 
            to the Legislature on the status of the Unemployment Fund in 
            May and October of each year.

          2)Specifies that the status report on the Unemployment Fund 
            shall include both actual and forecasted information on the 
            fund balance, receipts, disbursements, claim data, tax rates, 
            and employment levels.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Expected minor and absorbable cost to EDD.

           COMMENTS  :   

           1)Background.   The UI Program provides a partial wage 
            replacement on a weekly basis to eligible workers who lose 
            their job through no fault of their own.  UI is a federal and 
            state program created by Congress in 1935 as part of the 
            Social Security Act.  In 1935, California enacted the 
            Unemployment Insurance Act, which authorized the state 
            Unemployment Fund (commonly referred to as the Unemployment 
            Insurance Fund) that receives the payroll tax revenues used to 
            pay the UI benefits.  The state administering agency for the 
            UI Program and the UI Fund is EDD.

          Starting in 2008, the state has experienced a major economic 








                                                                  AB 226
                                                                  Page  2

            recession that has increased unemployment to the highest level 
            in 69 years.  In 2007, prior to this Great Recession, one 
            million people were unemployed in California, comprising an 
            unemployment rate of 5.8 percent.  In December 2010, 2.3 
            million people were unemployed, comprising a 12.5 percent 
            unemployment rate.  The latest statistics, for January 2011, 
            show only a minor improvement in this job picture with 2.2 
            million people unemployed, comprising an unemployment rate of 
            12.4%.  

           2)Status of the UI Fund.   The UI Fund is presently insolvent.  
            The state owes the federal government $10.1 billion in loans 
            taken to pay UI benefits.  This situation will trigger both 
            increased costs to the state General Fund and increased taxes 
            on employers.  The EDD estimates that it will cost the state 
            General Fund $301 this calendar year (in September 2011) to 
            pay the federal interest charges on this loan.  Additionally, 
            under the provisions of existing law, employers in California 
            will be facing an increase in federal UI taxes totaling $367 
            million next year.

           3)Argument in support.   The author states that there is a need 
            for more timely information on legislative options that would 
            help to maintain the UI Fund in balance.  This bill will 
            require EDD to prepare and report on estimates necessary to 
            restore the UI Fund to a balanced state.
           
          4)Argument in opposition.   The California Chamber of Commerce 
            states that the bill appears to limit the paths to solvency 
            for the UI Fund, and would like to see the bill encourage all 
            alternatives or options that may be available.  The Chamber 
            would also like to see a seven- year time frame to return to 
            solvency as well as a definition of solvency.
           
          5)Possible amendments.   The author suggests the following 
            amendments:
           
               a)     Expected consequences.   The bill should clarify that 
                 EDD would be required to report on the consequences to 
                 employers and employees, without a change in law, when 
                 the UI Fund is insolvent.  This amendment could read:  

               "Whenever the Unemployment Fund contains a negative 
                 balance, the department shall include in the status 
                 report on the Unemployment Fund a description of the 








                                                                  AB 226
                                                                  Page  3

                 expected consequences to employers, employees, and the 
                 state General Fund that would result under existing law 
                 if the Unemployment Fund is not returned to solvency 
                 within seven years."  
                
               b)     Definition of solvency.   Solvency in connection with 
                 the Unemployment Fund should be defined as containing a 
                 positive balance in this fund and the ability to pay its 
                 obligations at all times during the calendar year.  
           
           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          California Labor Federation

           Opposition 
           
          California Chamber of Commerce
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Manny Hernandez / INS. / (916) 319-2086