BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                          AB 252 (Calderon)
          
          Hearing Date: 8/15/2011         Amended: As Introduced
          Consultant: Maureen Ortiz       Policy Vote: GO  12-0
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY:  AB 252 extends an existing provision of the 
          Alcoholic Beverage Control Act that allows a manufacturer, 
          winegrower, rectifier, or distiller to provide their product 
          offerings directly to consumers free of charge during 
          invitational only events to "distilled spirits manufacturer's 
          agent".
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2011-12      2012-13       2013-14     Fund
           
          Enforcement/oversight               ------unknown, less than $50 
          partially
                                                                        
          offset by fee revenue--------        Special*                  
          *Alcoholic Beverage Control Fund
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: 
          
          To be eligible to hold an event, licensees must pay an annual 
          renewal fee of $131, and a caterer's permit fee of $25, and a 
          $200 fee per event.  According to the Department of Alcoholic 
          Beverage Control (ABC), AB 252 will give authority to about 16 
          additional licensees, however, it is unlikely that all of those 
          licensees will apply for eligibility to hold an invitation-only 
          event.  Fee revenue is expected to offset all costs.

          AB 2293 (De Leon), Chapter 638, Statutes of 2008, authorized a 
          manufacturer, winegrower, rectifier, or distiller or any 
          authorized agent of that person to provide, free of charge, 
          entertainment, food, and distilled spirits, wine, or 
          nonalcoholic beverages to consumers at an invitation-only event 
          in connection with the sale or distribution of wine or distilled 
          spirits.  Several conditions were place on these events 








          AB 252 (Calderon)
          Page 1




          including the limitation of 400 attendees per event, a 
          prohibition of persons under age 21, and a maximum duration of 
          four hours.  Since the enactment of AB 2293, only five event 
          authorizations have been granted.  The authorization will sunset 
          on January 1, 2014.

          AB 252 will extend the same authority to a distilled spirits 
          manufacturer's agent to also provide their product free of 
          charge at invitational-only events with the same conditions as 
          those required by AB 2293.

          Existing law, known as the "tied-house" law, separates the 
          alcoholic beverage industry into three component parts, or 
          tiers, of manufacturer (including breweries, wineries and 
          distilleries), wholesaler, and retailer (both on-sale and 
          off-sale).  Tied-house laws generally prohibit alcoholic 
          beverage licensees from giving away any gift, premium or free 
          goods in connection with the sale or distribution of alcoholic 
          beverages.   Consequently, AB 252 will expand an existing 
          tied-house exception which allows alcoholic beverage 
          manufacturers to hold private promotional events where they 
          provide food, entertainment, and alcohol to guests.

          This bill is similar to SB 1323 (Walters) which was held on the 
          Assembly Appropriations Committee Suspense file in 2010, 
          however, that bill would have expanded the existing exemption to 
          a much larger number of licensees.