BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 269
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 11, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                       AB 269 (Ma) - As Amended:  May 4, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Education 
          Vote:7-3

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires charter schools to comply with the following 
          existing law related to the health and safety of pupils: 

           1)Two-way communication devices : Existing statute expresses 
            legislative intent, if federal funding is available for this 
            purpose, that each school district governing board and county 
            superintendent of schools equips schools with a two-way 
            communication device (telephones, intercoms, walkie-talkies) 
            in each classroom used by K-12 pupils, as specified.  

           2)Maintenance of restrooms  : Existing statute requires every 
            public and private school maintaining K-12 classrooms to 
            comply with the following: 

             a)   Requires every restroom to be cleaned regularly and 
               fully operational, including stocked with toilet paper, 
               soap, and paper towels or functional hand dryers. 
             b)   Requires schools to keep all restrooms open during 
               school hours when pupils are not in classes and are 
               required to keep a sufficient number of restrooms open when 
               pupils are in classes.  

           3)School safety plans  : Existing law requires each schoolsite to 
            develop a comprehensive school safety plan, as specified. 

           4)Fire alarm systems  : Existing law requires school buildings 
            that have an occupant capacity of 50 or more students to have 
            a dependable and operative fire alarm system and requires the 
            alarm to be sounded once a month.  









                                                                  AB 269
                                                                  Page  2

           5)Access gates  : Existing law requires the governing board of a 
            school district and private school, which maintains any 
            building that is used for instruction or houses children and 
            is entirely closed by a fence, to have a sufficient sized gate 
            to allow the entrance of ambulances, police equipment, and 
            firefighting apparatuses.  

           6)Eye protective devices  : Existing law requires schools to be 
            equipped with eye protective devices for use by students and 
            teachers when participating in vocational or industrial arts, 
            shop classes, vocational education, etc. 

           7)Toxic art supplies  : Existing law prohibits the use of art 
            supplies in grades K-6 that contain toxic substances; statute, 
            however, allows schools with grades 7-12 to purchase toxic 
            substances provided they meet specified labeling requirements. 
             

           8)First aid kits  : Existing law requires each school to be 
            equipped with a first aid kit, as specified.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)GF/98 cost pressure, of approximately $800,000, to charter 
            schools to develop school safety plans.  To the extent a 
            charter school already has a school safety plan, this cost 
            would be reduced.  According to SDE, there were approximately 
            823 charter schools in 2009-10.   

             a)   The current mandate claim for school safety plans by 
               school districts is approximately $5 million annually.     

          2)GF/98 cost pressure, of approximately $125,000, to charter 
            schools to purchase two-way communication devices.  To the 
            extent a charter school already has these devices, this cost 
            would be reduced.  According to SDE, there were approximately 
            823 charter schools in 2009-10.  

          3)GF/98 and state school facility fund cost pressure, likely in 
            the hundreds of thousands to low millions, to charter schools 
            to ensure compliance with maintenance of restrooms, fire 
            alarms, and fences around their facility.  To the extent a 
            charter school is located in a property currently or 
            previously owned by a school district, the building may 
            already be in compliance and therefore, these costs may be 








                                                                  AB 269
                                                                  Page  3

            significantly reduced.  

          4)According to a May 2006 decision by the Commission on State 
            Mandates (CSM), charter schools are not eligible to claim 
            mandate reimbursements.  In denying charter schools' mandate 
            claims, the CSM repeatedly cites the fact that charter schools 
            are "voluntarily" created.   

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  According to the author, "Parents have the right to 
            expect uniform minimum provisions at all schools. Compliance 
            to such standards is necessary to protect the health and 
            safety of our state's children.  By not requiring charter 
            schools to adhere to the same standards, existing law leaves 
            health and safety issues up to local discretion, inviting 
            varying levels of standards."  This bill, sponsored by the 
            California Teachers Association, requires charter schools to 
            comply with specified statutes related to the health and 
            safety of pupils.  

           2)Is it a state reimbursable mandate if requirement applies to 
            private entities as well  ?  Generally, the CSM has determined 
            that if a requirement is imposed on both public and private 
            agencies, the public agency is not eligible for state 
            reimbursement.  According to the Legislative Analyst's Office, 
            "Specifically, the court found that local government employer 
            obligations were comparable to other employers, and were not 
            attributable to providing a new program to the public. 
            Together, these �appellate court] cases form the basis of what 
            is commonly referred to as the 'law of general applicability.' 
            That is, if a statute imposes similar obligations on the 
            private and public sector, the public sector's costs to comply 
            with the requirement do not constitute a state-reimbursable 
            mandate."
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Kimberly Rodriguez / APPR. / (916) 
          319-2081