BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �





                                                                  AB 294

                                                                  Page  1


          GOVERNOR'S VETO
          AB 294 (Portantino)
          As Amended  August 23, 2012
          2/3 vote

           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |79-0 |(May 31, 2011)  |SENATE: |35-0 |(August 28,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2012)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |79-0 |(August 29,     |        |     |               |
          |           |     |2012)           |        |     |               |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
           Original Committee Reference:   TRANS.
           
           SUMMARY  :  Reenacts authorization, until January 1, 2017, for the 
          California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to enter into 
          design-sequencing contracts, under certain conditions; clarifies 
          that Caltrans employees or its consultants are to perform 
          specific tasks associated with design-sequencing, design-build, 
          or public-private partnership contracts for projects on the 
          state highway system.  

           The Senate amendments:

           1)Eliminate the requirement that Caltrans submit a status report 
            on design-sequencing and instead direct the department to post 
            the report data on the Internet.  

          2)Postpone, from 2015 until 2017, the sunset date for the 
            authority to enter into design-sequencing contracts.  

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Does not provide Caltrans any current authority to let 
            design-sequencing contracts.  

          2)Requires, generally, Caltrans to award construction contracts 










                                                                  AB 294

                                                                  Page  2


            based on a process referred to as "design-bid-build."  This 
            process requires Caltrans, before it enters into any contract 
            for construction of a project, to prepare or cause to be 
            prepared full, complete, and accurate plans, specifications, 
            and estimates of cost, "giving such directions as will enable 
            any competent mechanic or other builder to carry them out."  

          3)Until January 1, 2010:  

             a)   Defined "design-sequencing" as a method of contracting 
               that enables the sequencing of design activities to permit 
               each construction phase to commence when design for that 
               phase is complete, instead of requiring the design for the 
               entire project to be completed before commencing 
               construction;  
              
             b)   Authorized Caltrans to use the design-sequencing 
               contract method on a pilot basis-up to 12 projects in each 
               of Phase I and Phase II of the pilot program; and,

             c)   Required Caltrans to prepare an annual status report on 
               the progress of design-sequencing contracts; also, required 
               a final report of the pilot program, detailing the positive 
               and negative aspects of design-sequencing.  

          4)Provides, in the State Constitution as amended by the voters 
            in 2000 (Proposition 35), that all governmental entities in 
            California are allowed to contract with qualified private 
            entities for architectural and engineering services for all 
            public works of improvement.  

          5)Establishes a design-build demonstration program whereby 
            Caltrans is authorized to undertake up to 10 state highway 
            projects using a design-build procurement method, as 
            prescribed.  

          6)Requires, for design-build projects on the state highway, 
            Caltrans to be responsible for the performance of project 
            development services, project documentation, and construction 
            inspection services; specifically provides that this work may 
            be done either by Caltrans employees or by consultants.  










                                                                  AB 294

                                                                  Page  3



          7)Authorizes, until 2017, Caltrans to enter into public-private 
            partnership projects; for these projects on the state highway 
            system, requires Caltrans to be responsible for the 
            performance of project development services, project 
            documentation, and construction inspection services; 
            specifically provides that this work may be done either by 
            Caltrans employees or by consultants.  

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , provisions re-enacting 
            design-sequencing authority were substantially similar to 
            those passed by the Senate.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, potential significant cost savings from expediting 
          project completion using design-sequencing.  

           COMMENTS  :  This bill reenacts, for a limited-time, 
          design-sequencing authority for Caltrans that expired January 1, 
          2010.  

          Design-sequencing was first authorized in 1999 by AB 405 (Knox), 
          Chapter 378, Statutes of 1999, which established the original 
          design-sequencing pilot program within Caltrans for up to six 
          projects.  The intent of AB 405 (Knox) was to offer an 
          alternative means to accelerate project delivery over 
          traditional means of contracting for highway improvements.  
          Under the traditional means, construction of any portion of the 
          project cannot commence until Caltrans has developed complete 
          plans and specifications for the project, placed the contract 
          out for bid, and awarded the contract.  AB 405 (Knox) sought to 
          test a form of contracting referred to as "design-sequencing" 
          that would speed completion of a project by allowing 
          construction on one phase of the project to be started while 
          other phases of the project were still under design.  As part of 
          the pilot program, Caltrans was to report to the Legislature on 
          the effectiveness of the program.  

          Of the 12 design-sequencing projects authorized as Phase I of 
          the pilot program, Caltrans initiated 10 projects before the end 
          of that phase.  SB 1210 (Torlakson), Chapter 795, Statutes of 










                                                                  AB 294

                                                                 Page  4


          2004, created Phase II of the pilot program and authorized an 
          additional 12 design-sequencing projects between January 2005 
          and January 2010.  Of those, Caltrans initiated 11 projects.  

          Caltrans asserts that design-sequencing has the potential to 
          accelerate project delivery (or avoid project delays) with 
          minimal risks.  Caltrans has argued that more needs to be 
          learned regarding design-sequence contracts to develop the 
          appropriate procedures, engineering mind set, and agency culture 
          needed to effectively implement this approach and to determine 
          the types of projects that would most benefit from use of this 
          approach.  

          In interim reports of the design-sequencing pilot program, 
          Caltrans reports mixed results in the initial design-sequencing 
          projects when compared to projects in the control group.  
          However, according to Caltrans staff, findings from some of the 
          more recent projects are more positive, due largely to the 
          refined criteria Caltrans is using to select appropriate 
          design-sequencing projects.  In fact, in its 2010 status of the 
          previous design-sequencing program, Caltrans states, "The 
          Department envisions design-sequencing as a valuable project 
          delivery tool that can reduce project completion time when 
          properly used on appropriately selected projects."  

          In light of Caltrans' overall experience to date with 
          design-sequencing, this bill will provide the department with 
          interim authority to use a project delivery tool that has 
          minimal risks and the potential to increase efficiency, reduce 
          costs, and help California take advantage of transportation 
          funds should they become available.  
           
           Provisions related to ensuring that Caltrans employees or 
          consultants actually perform (and not just be responsible for 
          performing) specific tasks for state highway projects undertaken 
          using design-sequencing, public-private partnership, or 
          design-build authority emanate from a recent court case.  The 
          case was filed by Professional Engineers in California 
          Government (PECG) against Caltrans and challenged the 
          department's use of a public-private partnership contract for 
          the Presidio Parkway project.   Essentially, PECG argued that, 










                                                                  AB 294

                                                                  Page  5


          because pre-development services on the project had not been 
          done by Caltrans employees or consultants, the project was not a 
          viable project under authorizing statutes which require Caltrans 
          to be responsible for these tasks.  The court disagreed.  It 
          ruled that a specific reading of the law requires Caltrans to be 
          the "responsible agency" for these tasks and that Caltrans' 
          responsibilities for oversight met that pre-requisite.  

          This bill would clarify that for projects on the state highway 
          system that use these alternative procurement methods, Caltrans 
          employees or Caltrans consultants are to perform the 
          pre-development services, document preparation, and construction 
          inspection.  

          Provisions related to Caltrans performing pre-development 
          services, document preparation, and construction inspection 
          services have not been heard in an Assembly policy committee.  
          
          GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE  :

          "This bill authorizes Caltrans to use design-sequencing as the 
          contracting method for eight new construction projects.
           
          "Caltrans has already constructed nearly 20 projects using 
          design-sequencing contracts and is currently evaluating whether 
          the state saved money.  To be sure we get the most from our 
          construction dollars, we should let Caltrans complete its 
          evaluation before authorizing more contracts."


           Analysis Prepared by  :   Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 
          FN: 0005948