BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 315
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 11, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                     AB 315 (Solorio) - As Amended:  May 5, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              InsuranceVote:12 
          - 0 

          Urgency:     Yes                  State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill conforms California surplus line insurance regulatory 
          and tax laws to recent federal financial reform law. 
          Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Repeals the requirement that, in most circumstances, prohibits 
            placement of insurance with a nonadmitted insurer unless that 
            insurer is on the List of Eligible Surplus Line Insurers 
            (LESLI List).

          2)Repeals the substantive criteria necessary for an insurer to 
            be placed on the LESLI List, but readopts similar criteria for 
            placement on a voluntary list of acceptable insurers.

          3)Establishes the financial requirements that a nonadmitted 
            insurer not on the voluntary list must meet in order for a 
            surplus line broker to place insurance with that insurer.

          4)Provides that the bill is an urgency statute, to take effect 
            immediately.


           FISCAL EFFECT
           
          1)Unknown tax revenue impact that could result in the gain or 
            loss of millions of dollars in tax revenue. 

            The Franchise Tax Board notes that this legislation will 
            impact the amount of "nonadmitted insurance tax" (NIT) that is 
            collected.  Currently, FTB collects approximately $10 million 
            annually. According to their analysis, the impact on this bill 








                                                                  AB 315
                                                                  Page  2

            is the difference between the additional taxes assessed on 
            taxpayers with California home state insured policies that 
            include out-of-state insurance, at 100 % of total premiums, 
            and the reduction of taxes assessed on policies that have a 
            California insurance component but which would not be subject 
            to tax because they do not meet the definition of a home state 
            policy. 

          2)Administrative costs associated with this legislation are 
            minor and absorbable within the Department of Insurance's 
            (DOI) resources.

           COMMENTS  

           Purpose  .  According to the sponsor of the bill, DOI, AB 315 is 
          intended to conform California law to the Nonadmitted and 
          Reinsurance Reform Act ("NRRA") that is part of the Dodd-Frank 
          Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, enacted 
          last year by the federal government.  That federal act included 
          provisions to add uniformity and simplicity to the states' 
          regulatory laws governing the placement of surplus line 
          insurance, and collection of the surplus line tax.  It pre-empts 
          certain regulatory requirements of California law, but more 
          importantly, unless conforming law is enacted by July 21 of this 
          year, California's authority to collect the surplus line tax 
          would also be limited.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916) 
          319-2081