BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 324
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   March 22, 2011

              ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND CONSUMER 
                                     PROTECTION
                                 Mary Hayashi, Chair
                   AB 324 (Buchanan) - As Amended:  March 15, 2011
           
          SUBJECT  :   State buildings: building locations: considerations.

           SUMMARY  :   Requires the Department of General Services (DGS) to 
          consider specified factors in selecting a location for the 
          lease, lease with the option to purchase, construction, or 
          purchase of a state building in excess of 10,000 square feet.  
          Specifically,  this bill  : 

          1)Requires consideration of the location of the community or 
            population served by the state building.

          2)Requires consideration of the residential location of the 
            workforce to be housed in the building, and priority may be 
            given to the locations that demonstrate the highest reduction 
            of miles traveled by its workforce.

          3)Requires consideration of the availability and proximity of 
            high quality and frequent transit service, including regularly 
            operated bus lines that are operational at the time a state 
            agency occupies the building. 

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Requires DGS to prepare plans and specifications for any 
            public building constructed pursuant to the State Building 
            Construction Act of 1955, which generally sets forth 
            procedures for the acquisition and construction of state 
            buildings.

          2)States that the "Capitol Area Plan" (Plan) is the official 
            state master plan for development in the central city area of 
            the City of Sacramento for the location of state buildings and 
            other improvements.  The Plan serves as a guide for future 
            state policy in the locating of state buildings and other 
            facilities in the metropolitan area.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown









                                                                  AB 324
                                                                  Page  2

           COMMENTS  :   
           
          Purpose of this bill  .  According to the author's office, "The 
          DGS currently does not consider the residential locations of the 
          majority of their workforce when planning for the construction 
          or acquisition of new state buildings.  As a result, communities 
          with the highest concentration of state workers often have to 
          travel further distances to get to work.  California's shortage 
          of public transportation systems amplified this problem, 
          particularly in the rural areas of our state.  This bill would 
          allow the DGS to consider where the workforce lives when 
          planning the lease, purchase or construction of a state 
          building."

           Background  .  Currently, DGS has numerous statutes and mandates 
          to comply with when selecting state buildings.  Executive Order 
          D-46-01 ordered that sound and smart growth patterns shall 
          receive maximum support consistent with the foregoing state 
          priorities, including the following considerations: 

             a)   Preferred siting or leasing in a central city or area of 
               similar character immediately adjacent thereto;

             b)   Construction or renovation of state-owned office 
               buildings with site plans and architectural designs of the 
               highest quality;

             c)   Sensitivity to building design and scale and 
               environmental concerns;

             d)   Proximity to public transit and other needed 
               infrastructure;

             e)   Proximity to affordable and available housing;

             f)   Pedestrian access to retail and commercial facilities, 
               and exploiting opportunities for mixed use; 

             g)   Indications of the need for neighborhood economic 
               revitalization;

             h)   Opportunities to utilize structures of historic, 
               cultural or architectural significance;

             i)   Communication with residents, property owners and 








                                                                  AB 324
                                                                  Page  3

               businesses regarding local concerns; and, 

             j)   Advice and recommendations of local elected officials 
               and their staff with consideration to any incentives 
               offered by local government.

          According to the City of Elk Grove, it is the second largest 
          city in Sacramento County with a population of 140,000 
          residents.  There are 12,625 Elk Grove residents that are state 
          government workers, and 76.9% of those workers, which equals 
          nearly 10,000 cars, drive to work alone.  The remaining 12.7% of 
          state workers residing in Elk Grove carpool.  The resulting 
          impact of these motorists is an average annual commute of 7,195 
          miles per vehicle, totaling 90,836,875 miles for the entire 
          population.

           Support  .  According to the sponsor, the City of Elk Grove, "The 
          single largest source of greenhouse gases in California is 
          emissions from passenger vehicles, and in order to reduce those 
          emissions, we must work to reduce Californians' vehicle-miles 
          traveled?  AB 324 will empower the State of California to lead 
          by example by locating State office buildings close to where the 
          State workforce lives.  One out of every ten Elk Grove residents 
          is a State government employee that travels 30.4 minutes to work 
          or more, depending on traffic congestion.  This travel creates 
          90,836,875 annual commute vehicle miles traveled which 
          contributes to poor air quality in the region."  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          City of Elk Grove (sponsor) 
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
          Elk Grove Chamber of Commerce
          Elk Grove Economic Development Corporation 
          Professional Engineers in California Government 
          State Building and Construction Trades Council of California
          State Employees International Union Local 1000 

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Joanna Gin / B.,P. & C.P. / (916) 








                                                                  AB 324
                                                                  Page  4

          319-3301