BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 378
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 378 (Solorio)
          As Amended  September 8, 2011
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |72-2 |(May 31, 2011)  |SENATE: |37-8 |(September 9,  |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2011)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    INS.

          SUMMARY  :  Regulates the dispensing of compounded medications and 
          other pharmacy goods in the workers' compensation system.   

           The Senate amendments  :

          1)Redraft the billing and reimbursement methodology for 
            compounded medications provided by a pharmacy by requiring a 
            billing to break down ingredients, and limiting reimbursement 
            to ingredients with a National Drug Code number.

          2)Establish a maximum 20% mark-up over documented acquisition 
            cost for most pharmacy goods dispensed by a physician from the 
            physician's office, including compounded medications. 

          3)Authorize a 300%, but capped at a maximum of $20, mark-up for 
            compounded medications dispensed by a physician from the 
            physician's office.

          4)Authorize full fee schedule reimbursement for repackaged 
            FDA-approved prescription drugs that are dispensed by a 
            physician from the physician's office.

          5)Provide that the Administrative Director (AD) of the Division 
            of Workers' Compensation (DWC) may adjust the pharmacy 
            reimbursement level if the Medi-Cal fee schedule, to which 
            workers' compensation pharmacy reimbursement is tied, is 
            reduced for purely Medi-Cal budgetary purposes.

          6)Clarify that the prohibition on physician financial interest 
            in the sale of pharmacy goods does not apply to certain 
            clinics operated at defined retail establishments.

          7)Adopt chaptering out amendments to ensure consistency with SB 








                                                                  AB 378
                                                                  Page  2

            923 (DeLeon).

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides for a comprehensive system of workers' compensation 
            benefits for injuries to employees arising out of or in the 
            course of employment.  Injured workers are entitled to 
            appropriate medical treatment, including necessary 
            medications, among other benefits.

          2)Provides for a fee schedule to govern the amount that a 
            provider may charge for medications, generally requiring 
            payment based on the Medi-Cal fee schedule.

          3)Requires, by regulation, that physicians dispensing medication 
            directly to patients from bulk supplies bill at the amount the 
            Medi-Cal schedule requires for the amount of medication being 
            dispensed.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill proposed a more complicated 
          billing and reimbursement mechanism for pharmacy products 
          dispensed by a physician from the physician's office, and did 
          not address repackaged medications or the Medi-Cal reimbursement 
          reduction contained in the Budget Act.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, to a similar version of the bill, savings to the 
          state of approximately $4 million in workers' compensation 
          costs.  Pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, this bill was determined 
          to have no state costs, and no fiscal analysis was published.

           COMMENTS  :  The basic policy arguments for and against this bill 
          remain the same as when the Assembly first considered the bill.  
          Labor and management support the bill as a necessary regulatory 
          control of an acknowledged abusive practice.  Opponents argue 
          that the solution proposed by the bill is too broad, and impacts 
          not just the abusive practices, but also legitimate practices.

          Proponents respond with two points:  first, a physician is 
          always authorized to write a prescription for a medically 
          necessary medication to be filled by a pharmacy, and the bill 
          does not contain limitations for this transaction where the 
          physician has no financial interest in the product; second, the 
          bill authorizes the AD to take administrative action to 
          establish exceptions or wholesale changes to the bill's 








                                                                  AB 378
                                                                  Page  3

          provisions if evidence arises that the bill's limitations are 
          creating access issues.


           Analysis Prepared by:   Mark Rakich / INS. / (916) 319-2086

                                                                FN: 0002876