BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 425
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 18, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 425 (Nestande) - As Introduced: February 14, 2011
Policy Committee: Business and
Professions Vote: 8 - 0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires that each state entity the promulgates
regulations review those regulations and repeal or report to the
Legislature by December 31, 2012, those regulations identified
as duplicative, archaic, or inconsistent with state statute. In
addition, it requires the affected state agencies to report to
the Legislature by that date on regulations deemed to inhibit
economic growth in the state.
FISCAL EFFECT
Unknown costs, likely in excess of $1 million, for all affected
state entities to review and assess all regulations in order to
determine their worth and whether or not they inhibit economic
growth in the state.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . This bill requires each state entity to review
previously adopted regulations, and repeal or report to the
Legislature those identified as duplicative, archaic,
inconsistent with statute or other regulations, or deemed to
inhibit economic growth in the state.
The author intends for this bill to begin the process of
eliminating duplicative and archaic state regulations.
According to the author, California's regulations play a
significant role in the decision-making of job creators about
whether they should invest in California or relocate to other
states.
AB 425
Page 2
2)Related Legislation . Over the last two years, dozens of bills
have been introduced in the Legislature that attempt to
change, streamline, or improve the regulations process. Among
the bills pending in the Assembly are AB 127 (Logue), AB 213
(Silva), AB 273 (Valadao), AB 338 (Wagner), AB 410 (Swanson),
AB 429 (Knight), AB 530 (Smyth), AB 535 (Morrell), AB 586
(Garrick), AB 632 (Wagner), AB 691 (Perea), AB 1213 (Nielsen),
and AB 1322 (Bradford).
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081