BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 436|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 436
          Author:   Solorio (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/30/11 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
          PRIOR VOTES NOT RELEVANT

           SENATE LABOR & IND. REL. COMM.  : 4-1, 9/1/11 pursuant to 
            29.10
          AYES: Lieu, DeSaulnier, Leno, Yee
          NOES: Runner
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Wyland, Padilla


           SUBJECT  :    Public works:  labor compliance

           SOURCE  :     State Building and Construction Trades Council 
          of 
                      California, AFL-CIO


           DIGEST  :    This bill makes changes to existing law related 
          to the prevailing wage enforcement mechanism within the 
          Department of Industrial Relations in order to address 
          potential legal questions about the funding method of that 
          process.  

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/30/11 delete the prior version 
          of the bill which dealt with the definition of 'public 
          works; and instead (1) provides that the Department of 
          Industrial Relations (DIR) shall monitor and enforce 
          compliance with applicable prevailing wage requirements, 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 436
                                                                Page 
          2

          through the Labor Compliance Monitoring Unit, for any 
          public works project paid for in whole or part out of 
          public funds that are derived from bonds issued by the 
          state, and shall charge each awarding body for the 
          reasonable and directly-related costs of monitoring and 
          enforcing compliance with the prevailing wage requirements 
          on each such project; (2) clarifies the method by which DIR 
          may charge and be reimbursed for monitoring and enforcing 
          compliance with the prevailing wage requirements for public 
          works projects paid for out of public funds derived from 
          state-issued bonds; (3) states that monitoring and 
          enforcing of prevailing wage compliance on public works 
          projects paid for out of public funds that are derived from 
          state-issued bonds is a necessary and prudent oversight 
          activity and constitutes an inherent cost of construction, 
          payable from state bond proceeds allocated to such 
          construction; (4) provides that the awarding body may elect 
          not to receive or expend amounts from bond proceeds to pay 
          such costs of the project, however such election does not 
          relieve the awarding body from reimbursing DIR for 
          monitoring and enforcing prevailing wage requirements on 
          the project; (5) specifies that the enforcement fee 
          requirements do not apply to state bond funded projects and 
          specified design-build projects if the awarding body has 
          entered into a collective bargaining agreement that binds 
          all of the contractors performing work on the contract and 
          that includes a mechanism for resolving disputes about the 
          payment of wages; (6) authorizes, upon order of the 
          Director of the Department of Finance, a loan in the amount 
          of not more than $4.3 million to be provided from the 
          Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust Fund to the State Public 
          Works Enforcement Fund, to meet the start-up needs of the 
          Labor Compliance Monitoring Unit.; (7) relates and 
          conforming changes to existing law; and (8) adds Senator 
          Alex Padilla as a co-author of the bill. 

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law authorizes the awarding body for 
          a public works project to not require the payment of the 
          general prevailing rate of per diem wages on public works 
          projects of specified sizes and types of work, if the 
          awarding body elects to initiate and enforce a labor 
          compliance program containing specified requirements for 
          every public works project under the authority of the 
          awarding body or the awarding body elects to meet certain 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 436
                                                                Page 
          3

          requirements with regard to any public works project under 
          its authority, including payment of a fee to DIR for the 
          enforcement of prevailing wage obligations, as specified, 
          which may be waived under specified circumstances, 
          determined by the department and deposited in the State 
          Public Works Enforcement Fund.

          Existing law also requires DIR, with the approval of the 
          Director of Finance, to assess a fee on any awarding body 
          using funds derived from any bonds issued by the state to 
          fund public works projects, as specified, which are 
          deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, a 
          continuously appropriated fund.  Existing law also requires 
          an awarding body that chooses to use funds derived from 
          either the Kindergarten-University Public Education 
          Facilities Bond Act of 2002 or the Kindergarten-University 
          Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004, or the body 
          awarding any contract for a public works project financed 
          in any part with funds made available by the Water 
          Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach 
          Protection Act of 2002 or the Safe, Reliable High-Speed 
          Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century, to pay a fee 
          to the department sufficient to support the department's 
          costs in ensuring compliance with and enforcing prevailing 
          wage requirements on the project and labor compliance 
          enforcement, as specified, to be deposited in the State 
          Public Works Enforcement Fund.  Existing law authorizes DIR 
          to waive the fee where specified criteria are met.

          Existing law gives specified authority for certain school 
          district governing boards, governing boards of community 
          college districts and community college facility 
          construction projects, cities, counties, qualified entities 
          that operate a wastewater facility, solid waste management 
          facility, or water recycling facility, transit operators, 
          and unified school districts to enter into design-build 
          contracts for specified projects if certain requirements 
          are met, including the establishment and enforcement of a 
          labor compliance program or the contracting with a 
          third-party to operate a labor compliance program.  
          Existing law gives specified authority for the San Diego 
          Model School Development Agency to award construction 
          contracts, as specified, and requires it to establish and 
          enforce a labor compliance program or to contract with a 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 436
                                                                Page 
          4

          third-party to operate a labor compliance program.

          Existing law requires entities contracting under the above 
          provisions to pay a fee to DIR, established by DIR as 
          specified, sufficient to support the DIR's costs in 
          ensuring compliance with and enforcing prevailing wage 
          requirements on the project and labor compliance.  Existing 
          law requires all fees collected pursuant to these 
          provisions to be deposited in the State Public Works 
          Enforcement Fund and to be used only for enforcement of 
          prevailing wage requirements on those projects and 
          authorizes the department to waive the fee if specified 
          criteria are met.

          This bill:

          1. Makes revisions regarding the method by which DIR sets 
             reimbursement rates for its costs of performing 
             prevailing wage monitoring and enforcement on the 
             specified public works projects described above, when 
             the reimbursement to DIR may be waived:

          2. Exempts from the above-described requirements those 
             public works projects financed in any part by the Water 
             Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach 
             Protection Act of 2002. 

          3. Provides that, upon an order of the Director of Finance, 
             a loan in an amount not to exceed $4,300,000 shall be 
             made from the Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust Fund to 
             the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, thereby 
             depositing additional moneys into a continuously 
             appropriated fund. 

           Comments
           
          This bill makes changes to the method by which SBX2-9 
          funded DIR to perform these prevailing wage monitoring 
          services.  Instead of paying a fee, awarding bodies would 
          now be charged by DIR for their enforcement activities and 
          the entity would have to reimburse DIR for those costs. 

          The changes in the manner in which awarding bodies pay for 
          the DIR service were required as a result of concerns by 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 436
                                                                Page 
          5

          the Attorney General's Office that the previous method of 
          reimbursement could be challenged as inconsistent with 
          constitutional bond law.  As a consequence, the Attorney 
          General's Office will be unable to issue an "unqualified 
          bond opinion" for state bond sales, thereby preventing the 
          state from issuing bonds.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No


           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/1/11) 

          State Building and Construction Trades Council of 
          California
          The Solice Group

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The State Building and 
          Construction Trades Council of California strongly supports 
          this bill and writes, "There exists an urgent need to 
          provide enforcement resources which enable the DIR to hold 
          contractors and sub-contractors accountable for prevailing 
          wage violations.  Currently, the DIR employs less than two 
          dozen staff to cover the tens of thousands of public works 
          projects statewide.  Taxpayers, law-abiding contractors and 
          construction workers are the primary victims when publicly 
          funded projects go unprotected against fraud and abuse by 
          unscrupulous contractors seeking to profit at the public's 
          expense.  Non-compliance is often a sign of other 
          violations such as failure to carry workers' compensation 
          coverage and unemployment insurance and participation in 
          the underground economy.


          PQ:do  9/1/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
          





                                                           CONTINUED