BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 452
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 11, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 452 (Ma) - As Amended: April 25, 2011
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote: 7-0
Judiciary 9-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill expands the misdemeanor offense of using an electronic
tracking device on a non-consenting party to include use of a
third party to employ the device. This bill also:
1)Provides for numerous exemptions, including law enforcement,
legal guardians, authorized and commercial service providers.
2)Makes it a misdemeanor to require or compel another person to
undergo subcutaneous implantation of an electronic tracking
device.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Negligible state cost.
2)Unknown, likely minor, non-state-reimbursable local costs,
offset to a degree by increased fine revenue, to the extent
anyone is prosecuted for third party electronic tracking.
COMMENTS
Rationale . The author and sponsor, the L.A. City Attorney,
contend this bill updates the code to protect privacy. According
to the L.A. City Attorney, "Prosecutors are now encountering
problems applying some of California's current Penal Code
sections to conduct that is presently endangering and harming
our community. AB 452 works to criminalize the abuse of
technology, while permitting those who choose to use it to
locate friends, family members and others, to lawfully do so."
AB 452
Page 2
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081