BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 456
Page 1
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
AB 456 (Wagner)
As Amended September 2, 2011
Majority vote
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: |69-0 |(April 25, |SENATE: |35-0 |(September 7, |
| | |2011) | | |2011) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Original Committee Reference: JUD.
SUMMARY : Clarifies the procedure for mechanics liens claims.
Specifically, this bill clarifies that mechanics' lien claimants
in construction disputes shall specify in the required affidavit
indicating service of the notice of mechanics lien that the
notice was served on the owner or reputed owner of the property.
The Senate amendments delete the Assembly version of this bill
and instead amend the bill to substitute the above provisions.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill addressed motions to stay
litigation pending arbitration of mechanics lien claims by
specifying that a party may seek a stay of litigation pending
the outcome of arbitration to which the parties agree, without
any necessity to move for an order to compel arbitration,
provided that if any party opposes the motion to stay the action
on the ground that the party objects to arbitration of the
dispute, the court shall determine whether the claim of lien or
any relevant issue, question or dispute is subject to
arbitration before staying the action.
FISCAL EFFECT : None
COMMENTS : According to the author, existing law requires that a
mechanics lien and the accompanying Proof of Service Affidavit
be served on an owner or reputed owner by registered mail,
certified mail, or first-class mail, evidenced by a certificate
of mailing, postage prepaid, addressed to the owner or reputed
owner at the owner's or reputed owner's residence or place of
business address or at the address shown by the building permit
on file. The author argues that this bill would provide
clarification and consistency to ensure that, if the owner or
reputed owner is listed in the Proof of Service Affidavit, there
would not be the opportunity to invalidate the lien based on a
AB 456
Page 2
minor error in the name, part of the name or title.
Supporters argue that this bill makes an important clarifying
change to existing law that, if left unchanged, could result in
mechanics liens being invalidated due to very minor errors.
Analysis Prepared by : Kevin G. Baker / JUD. / (916) 319-2334
FN: 0002783