BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 458
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 6, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 458 (Atkins) - As Amended: March 29, 2011
Policy Committee:
JudiciaryVote:10-0 (Consent)
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill establishes venue rules for the filing of certain
guardianship cases. Specifically, this bill:
1)Establishes specific venue rules for the filing of a
guardianship case when a custody or visitation proceeding has
been filed in another court.
2)Requires the court where a guardianship proceeding is
commenced, and if it appoints a guardian, to communicate with
each court where a custody or visitation proceeding for the
same child is on file before making a venue determination.
3)Requires the Judicial Council, by January 1, 2013, to adopt
rules of court to implement the provisions in (2).
4)Provides that once a guardian or a temporary guardian is
appointed, the court in the guardianship proceeding has
exclusive jurisdiction to determine all custody and visitation
issues for the child until the guardianship is terminated.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor absorbable costs for the Judicial Council to adopt the
required rules of court and for the courts to implement the
required procedures.
COMMENTS
Purpose . According to the Judicial Council (sponsor), AB 458
creates presumptions for determining venue based on the length
AB 458
Page 2
of the residence of the proposed ward and guardian in the county
where the guardianship action was filed, but preserves the
court's ability to make the ultimate determination based on the
best interests of the minor.
The bill also establishes a consultative procedure between
courts to assist in determining the appropriate venue of a
probate guardianship when one or more custody proceedings
involving the proposed ward are on file in one or more other
counties.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081