BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                AB 467
                                                                Page 1

        ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
        AB 467 (Eng)
        As Amended  January 26, 2012
        2/3 vote.  Urgency 

         ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY          8-0                   APPROPRIATIONS 
        17-0                
         
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |Ayes:|Wieckowski, Miller,       |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |
        |     |Campos, Davis, Feuer,     |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |
        |     |Bonnie Lowenthal,         |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |
        |     |Morrell, Valadao          |     |Chesbro, Donnelly, Gatto, |
        |     |                          |     |Hall, Hill, Ammiano,      |
        |     |                          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Norby, |
        |     |                          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |
        |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
        |     |                          |     |                          |
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         SUMMARY  :  Modifies the allocation of the Safe Drinking Water, Water 
        Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Act 
        of 2006 (Proposition 84) funds collected from responsible parties 
        for groundwater contamination cleanup.  Specifically,  this bill  :

        1)Makes legislative findings that the California Department of 
          Public Health (CDPH) shall adopt guidelines to address the use of 
          funds recovered by local agencies from parties responsible for 
          groundwater contamination.  

        2)Makes legislative findings that the CDPH, in determining the 
          circumstances when repayments from responsible parties may be 
          utilized by the local agency for additional groundwater cleanup 
          activities, the CDPH shall give preference to projects that meet 
          one or more of the following conditions:

           a)   The grant amount and the amount of monies recovered from the 
             parties responsible for the groundwater contamination will not 
             exceed the total cost of cleaning up the contamination or 
             preventing future contamination;

           b)   The local agency has additional areas of groundwater 
             contamination within its jurisdiction for which there is no 
             identified responsible party and the funds will be used to 
             cleanup the contamination;









                                                                AB 467
                                                                Page 2

           c)   The local agency will utilize the repayment funds for the 
             cleanup of groundwater contamination where the cost recovery 
             from responsible parties is insufficient to pay the full cost 
             of cleanup; or,

           d)   The local agency will use the recovered funds to cleanup 
             groundwater at a site designated pursuant to the federal 
             Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
             Liability Act of 1980 (federal Superfund).

        3)Authorizes the CDPH guidelines adopted to meet the repayment 
          requirements to include provisions that allocate up to 3% of 
          recovered funds to pay for oversight by the CDPH to ensure that 
          the local agency expends any recovered funds consistent with the 
          requirements of Proposition 84.






        4)Authorizes the CDPH to establish an agreement between the local 
          agency and the CDPH that specifies that:

           a)   The local agency is required to take appropriate action to 
             recover costs from parties responsible for the groundwater 
             contamination;

           b)   Funds recovered by the local agency from the parties 
             responsible for the groundwater contamination will be deemed to 
             be under the control and authority of the State of California; 
             and,

           c)   The funds recovered by the local agency may be used for 
             ongoing groundwater cleanup activities. 

        5)Provides that allowing local agencies to keep recovered funds is 
          consistent with the provisions of Proposition 84 that require 
          repayment to CDPH for costs that are subsequently recovered from 
          parties responsible for the groundwater contamination.

        6)Provides that this is an urgency measure, 2/3 vote required.

         EXISTING LAW  :









                                                                AB 467
                                                                Page 3

        1)Authorizes, under Proposition 84 the state to sell about $5.4 
          billion in general obligation bonds for safe drinking water; water 
          quality; water supply; flood control; natural resource protection; 
          and, park improvements.

        2)Requires the CDPH, when implementing the provisions of Proposition 
          84, among other things, to develop and adopt guidelines and 
          regulations, consult with other entities, conduct studies, and 
          follow certain procedures for establishing a project, grant, loan 
          or other financial assistance program.

        3)Provides that the CDPH must require repayment of Proposition 84 
          funds from parties responsible for contamination.

         FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, 
        this bill may result in a potential redirection of funds, possibly 
        in the millions of dollars, to certain local groundwater cleanup 
        projects, and away from the CDPH or the State Treasury (Proposition 
        84 bond funds).  Potential litigation costs of an unknown amount, 
        but possibly in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, to defend the 
        provisions of this bill, should they be challenged.  (General Fund)  
         
         COMMENTS  :  

         Need for the bill  .  According to the author, this bill is needed, 
        "to allow local agencies that have been awarded Proposition 84 funds 
        from CDPH for groundwater projects that are able to subsequently 
        recover funds from responsible parties to keep the money to fund 
        additional groundwater cleanup activities.  Should local agencies be 
        successful in recovering the costs from responsible parties, this 
        bill will save significant State administrative costs and allow the 
        local agencies to use all of the recovered funds for groundwater 
        cleanup."



         San Gabriel Valley groundwater contamination  .  This bill is 
        supported by the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, 
        which is involved in the cleanup of the Superfund sites in the San 
        Gabriel Valley.  These sites include multiple areas of contaminated 
        groundwater in the 170-square mile San Gabriel Valley.  The 
        contaminated areas underlie significant portions of the cities of 
        Alhambra, Arcadia, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Industry, Irwindale, El 
        Monte, La Puente, Monrovia, Rosemead, South El Monte, and West 
        Covina.








                                                                AB 467
                                                                Page 4



         Proposition 84  .  Approved by the voters in 2006, authorized $60 
        million to the CDPH for loans and grants for projects to prevent or 
        reduce contamination of groundwater that serves as a source of 
        drinking water for the San Gabriel Valley.  The CDPH requires 
        repayment for costs that are subsequently recovered from parties 
        responsible for the contamination.

         
        Is this a modification to Proposition 84 ?  When the voters approved 
        Proposition 84, the initiative included specific language requiring 
        the repayment of funds from those persons or businesses that caused 
        the toxic contamination.  The initiative included Public Resources 
        Code (PRC) Section 75025, which mandates that the CDPH require 
        repayment of subject funds.  The full text of PRC Section 75025 is 
        as follows:

             The sum of sixty million dollars ($60,000,000) shall be 
             available to the Department of Health Services for the 
             purpose of loans and grants for projects to prevent or 
             reduce contamination of groundwater that serves as a 
             source of drinking water.  The Department of Health 
             Services shall require repayment for costs that are 
             subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the 
             contamination.  The Legislature may enact legislation 
             necessary to implement this section.

        While the language of Proposition 84 allows the Legislature to enact 
        legislation to implement the programs, on the other hand it is not 
        clear if the repayment requirements of the original bond act would 
        be met under the provisions of this bill.

         Does this bill require local agencies to return funds recovered from 
        parties responsible for the groundwater contamination to the state  ?  
        The bill now provides that any funds recovered by the local agency 
        may be deemed to be under the control and authority of the state and 
        therefor repaid to the state as required by Proposition 84.  Since 
        this money will, in fact, not be returned to the state for repayment 
        of Proposition 84 bond cost, the Legislature deeming it repaid may 
        be not consistent with the requirements of Public Resources Code 
        75025 as approved by the voters.  

        Uncodified legislative priorities for Proposition 84 funds  .  The 
        bill establishes priorities for the allocation of funds recovered 








                                                                AB 467
                                                                Page 5

        from responsible parties including the intent that funds be used at 
        federal Superfund sites like the San Gabriel Valley.  This direction 
        is not included in the codified mandate for CDPH to establish 
        guidelines for the recovery of funds from responsible parties and 
        the bill fails to provide a method for the legislative finding to be 
        implemented by the CDPH. 


         Analysis Prepared by  :    Bob Fredenburg / E.S. & T.M. / (916) 
        319-3965 


                                                                  FN: 0003078