BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 478
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   March 29, 2011

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION
                                 Marty Block, Chair
                AB 478 (Hernandez) - As Introduced:  February 15, 2011
           
          SUBJECT  :   Community colleges: funding.

           SUMMARY  :   Eliminates the 2% cap on the level of unemployment 
          exceeding 5% that the California Community Colleges (CCC) uses 
          for purposes of calculating the request for enrollment growth 
          funding and instead requires the CCC Chancellor's Office to 
          determine any amount exceeding 5% and report that amount, along 
          with the rational for the determination, to the Department of 
          Finance (DOF).    

           EXISTING LAW  requires CCC Board of Governors to annually request 
          system-level funding from the Administration and the 
          Legislature, using the following formula to calculate its annual 
          system growth: 

          1)Weighted average of the adult population-rate change, ages 
            19-24 and 25-65.

          2)The unemployment increase when unemployment exceeds 5%, not to 
            exceed a 2% positive difference.  

          3)Unfunded full-time equivalent students (FTES) in the areas of 
            transfer, vocational education, and basic skills.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.  However, according to the Assembly 
          Appropriations Committee analysis of similar legislation 
          introduced in 2009, potential significant Proposition 98 cost 
          pressure to allocate additional funding for enrollment growth 
          during periods of high unemployment.  For example, a 10% 
          unemployment rate would yield a request from the CCC for an 
          additional 3% enrollment growth-equal to about $185 million at 
          current funding rates.  Actual funding for CCC enrollment growth 
          is determined through the state budget process.

           COMMENTS  :    Background  :  SB 361 (Scott), Chapter 631, Statutes 
          of 2005, replaced CCC's program-based funding with the current 
          allocation mechanism that generally provides a single rate per 
          FTES for all CCC districts.  In addition, SB 361 requires the 
          CCC Board of Governors to request funding annually for 








                                                                  AB 478
                                                                  Page  2

          enrollment growth based on the aforementioned factors.  The 
          provisions that this bill would alter one of the factors (the 
          unemployment rate) used in determining annual enrollment growth 
          requests. 

           Purpose of this bill  :  Unemployment and CCC enrollment have a 
          strong positive correlation.  While fiscal constraints may 
          preclude the Legislature and Administration from funding growth 
          up to the level of demand, current law prevents the 
          Administration and Budget Committees from even considering 
          appropriately correlating demand for CCC courses with the 
          current high rates of unemployment.  The author believes CCC 
          should be able to include actual unemployment rates in its 
          annual budget request to provide a more accurate representation 
          of CCC enrollment growth needs.  

           Why the 2% limitation  ?  The 2% cap ensures that CCC can never 
          report an unemployment rate greater than 7% (the 5% threshold 
          plus the 2% cap), limiting future cost pressures on the state 
          budget.  However, that limitation comes at the expense of 
          accurate information.  For example, unemployment was 12.4% in 
          January 2011, which CCC was not able to accurately reflect in 
          its budget request despite the likely effect on demand for CCC 
          services.

           Impact on the state budget  :  The Administration and the 
          Legislature are not required to include CCC's budget request in 
          their proposals.  It is one of many funding requests from state 
          entities that can be accepted or rejected, depending upon the 
          state's fiscal condition.

           Prior Legislation  :  AB 385 (Block) of 2009 was substantially 
          similar to this bill.  AB 385 was held in the Senate Education 
          Committee at the request of the author. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Faculty Association of California Community Colleges (sponsor)
          California Federation of Teachers
          California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office

           Opposition 
           








                                                                  AB 478
                                                                  Page  3

          None on File
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916) 
          319-3960