BILL ANALYSIS Ó
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
AB 478 (Hernandez)
Hearing Date: 08/25/2011 Amended: 04/07/2011
Consultant: Jacqueline Wong-HernandezPolicy Vote: Education 9-0
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: AB 478 eliminates the 2 percent cap on the amount
of unemployment in excess of 5 percent that the California
Community Colleges (CCC) must use for purposes of calculating
the annual request for enrollment growth funding.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Fund
Remove 2% cap Substantial cost pressure; low hundreds
of millions* General**
* Exact amount will vary each year, tied to the unemployment
rate
**Counts toward meeting the Proposition 98 minimum funding
guarantee
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE.
SB 361 (Scott, 2006) replaced the CCC's program-based funding
with a new allocation mechanism that generally provides a single
rate per full-time equivalent student (FTES) for all CCC
districts. In addition, SB 361 requires the CCC Board of
Governors to request funding annually for enrollment growth
based on a formula including: (A) the weighted average of the
adult population-rate change for ages 19-24 and 25-65; (B) the
amount that the state unemployment rate exceeded 5% in the most
recent fiscal year, not to exceed a 2% difference; and (C) the
unfunded FTES in the areas of transfer, vocational education,
and basic skills.
The current mechanism seeks to project enrollment growth based
on factors likely to impact CCC enrollment rates, and needed
> (>)
Page 1
funding to support that enrollment. Unemployment and CCC
enrollment trends historically have a strong positive
correlation, and that projection is part of the calculation. The
2% cap, previously described, ensures that the CCC can never
report an unemployment rate greater than 7% (the 2% cap above a
5% threshold) as a factor in projecting its enrollment growth.
This limits cost pressures on the state budget to provide
additional funding for projected enrollment due to higher
unemployment.
In fiscal year 2010-11, at the time the CCCs were calculating
enrollment growth, statewide unemployment was at 11.3 percent,
but was capped at 7% for the formula to determine the budget
request. This year, CCCs are calculating 2.2% growth and
requesting $126 million in growth funding. Removing the
unemployment cap of 2% would have resulted in a 4.3% growth
rate, and a statutory growth request of $245 million more than
the $126 million received. Without the cap, the CCCs could have
requested $371 million in total growth in current year.