BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 487
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 26, 2011

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS
                                 Paul J. Cook, Chair
                      AB 487 (Cook) - As Amended:  April 4, 2011
           
          SUBJECT  :   Veterans' homes: fees and charges

           SUMMARY  :   This bill changes the fees veteran members pay for 
          residence and care in the Veterans Home of California.  This 
          bill caps the fees members pay and sets an initial dollar amount 
          cap.  Also, annually beginning January 1, 2012, this bill 
          requires the cap to be recalculated to reflect any changes in 
          the United States Department of Veterans Affairs ("USDVA") 
          compensation from the previous year.

          Specifically,  this bill  initially caps the amount paid by the 
          member at:

               (1) One thousand six hundred sixty-five dollars ($1,665) 
               per month for domiciliary care;

               (2) One thousand eight hundred dollars ($1,800) per month 
               for residential care for the elderly or assisted living;

               (3) Three thousand four hundred fifty dollars ($3,450) per 
               month for intermediate care; or

               (4) Three thousand seven hundred fifty dollars ($3,750) per 
               month for skilled nursing care.

           EXISTING LAW:  Existing law provides that members of the Home 
          shall pay fees and charges as determined by the California 
          Department of Veterans' Affairs ("Department").  Under the 
          existing statute:

               (a)    The total of the individual member's fees and 
                 charges for any fiscal year shall not be greater than:

                    (1)         Forty-seven and one-half percent of the 
                      member's annual income for domiciliary care;

                    (2)         Fifty-five percent of the member's annual 
                      income for residential care for the elderly or 
                      assisted living;








                                                                  AB 487
                                                                  Page  2


                    (3) Sixty-five percent of the member's annual income 
                    for intermediate care; and

                    (4) Seventy percent of the member's annual income for 
                    skilled nursing care.

               (b) Nonveteran spouses who become members of the home on or 
               after July 1, 2009, shall pay fees and charges ?, as 
               described in subdivision (a), or an amount equal to the 
               annual amount of federal per diem received for a veteran 
               member in domiciliary care, whichever is greater. If the 
               nonveteran member's income is less than the annual amount 
               of federal per diem for a veteran member in domiciliary 
               care, the nonveteran member shall pay a maximum of 90 
               percent of his or her annual income.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :   Requiring fees to be paid by members of the Veterans 
          Home helps offset the costs associated with the operation of the 
          Home.  The existing sliding scale for members is based on a 
          percentage of income and without a cap represents a policy 
          choice that the member should pay a portion of the member's 
          income without a limit; those with higher incomes pay the same 
          proportion of their income but a larger dollar amount.   

          However, until 2009 in addition to the sliding scale there was a 
          cap on the residential fees for each classification of care.  
          The caps represented a policy choice that members should pay a 
          portion of their income.  Those with higher incomes should pay 
          the same proportion of their income and a larger dollar amount, 
          but only up to a capped amount. The caps were $1,200 per month 
          for residential care, $2,300 per month for intermediate care, 
          and $2,500 per month for skilled nursing care.  

          The 2009/2010 Budget removed these caps.   These changes removed 
          income caps for all levels of care, added a separate fee 
          structure for the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly 
          (RCFE) level of care in which the income contribution percentage 
          is set to 55 percent, and required non-veteran spouses to pay 
          either 90 percent of income up to $1,100 or $1,032 whichever is 
          greater.  The fee caps were removed in 2009 to address a budget 
          deficit and because they had not been adjusted since 
          implementation.  








                                                                  AB 487
                                                                  Page  3


          California is still in a budget deficit situation.  The 
          Legislative Analyst's Office indicates that the deficit is 
          approximately $20-25 billion dollars.  The caps mandated in the 
          bill do represent increases from the caps contained in the 
          previous version of this code section of approximately 50%, 
          furthermore, this bill provides a mechanism by which the caps 
          will be self-adjusting. 

          Related Legislation:

          AB 488 (Cook) This bill amends the same code sections and 
          requires that the fees paid by nonveteran spouses be the same as 
          those paid by members.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          None on file.

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    John Spangler / V. A. / (916) 319-3550