BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 495
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   January 19, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                      AB 495 (Logue) - As Amended:  May 5, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Business and 
          Professions  Vote:                            8-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill authorizes the Director of General Services (DGS) to 
          transfer to Butte County a 2.29-acre state property previously 
          declared surplus to the state's needs and authorized for sale or 
          transfer pursuant to current law. Specifically, this bill:

          1)Authorizes DGS to transfer the Harts Mill Forest Fire Station 
            (HMFFS), located in Berry Creek, to Butte County.

          2)Requires the county to reimburse DGS for reasonable 
            administrative costs of the transfer.

          3)Requires the county to maintain the property in perpetuity for 
            parks or open space purposes.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          If the director decides that a transfer of the property to the 
          county is in the best interest of the state in lieu of selling 
          the property to the highest bidder, based on DGS's most recent 
          appraisal of the property (2010), there could be a one-time 
          General Fund revenue loss of around $130,000. However, the state 
          advertised this property for sale by competitive bidding from 
          April through October of last year and received no responsive 
          bids. The department has recently contracted with a private 
          broker to sell the property for a commission. In addition, the 
          county is in the process of rezoning the property, with a 
          designation of "public/quasi-public." This process should be 
          completed by the spring or summer. Given the apparent lack of 
          demand for this property and the pending new zoning designation, 
          the property is unlikely to sell at the appraised value, even if 








                                                                  AB 495
                                                                  Page  2

          a willing buyer were to come forth. Rather than incurring the 
          expense of holding the property indefinitely, this bill gives 
          the director the option to transfer the property to the county 
          if the director determines this is the least costly approach in 
          the long run.

          With respect to any environmental contamination on the site 
          related to water or asbestos, the state's responsibility for any 
          required remediation is without regard to whether the 
          disposition is by sale or transfer.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background  . SB 136 (Huff)/Chapter 166 of 2009, authorized DGS 
            to dispose all or any portion of the HMFFS. Current law 
            requires DGS, if surplus property is not needed by any other 
            state, and prior to being offered for sale to private entities 
            or individuals, to offer the property to the appropriate local 
            government(s) for local government facilities, parks and 
            recreation, open-space, or low- or moderate-income housing. 
            This right-of-first refusal period to local government extends 
            for only 60 days. 

            A local recreation district notified DGS of its interest in 
            HMFFS and entered into negotiations, but eventually declined 
            to purchase the property. Butte County then became interested 
            in the property, but could not negotiate with the state as the 
            60-day period for right-of-first refusal had expired. 

           2)Purpose  . The author believes it is highly unlikely that the 
            state could make a profit on a private sale. Despite its 
            detriments, the site is a historical landmark for Berry Creek, 
            a community of 1,700, and its residents have actively 
            advocated for a multi-use community center and park on its 
            location.
            
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081