BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 514
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 514 (Roger Hernández)
          As Amended  April 27, 2011
          Majority vote 

           LABOR & EMPLOYMENT     5-1      APPROPRIATIONS      12-5        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Swanson, Alejo, Allen,    |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield,     |
          |     |Furutani, Yamada          |     |Bradford, Charles         |
          |     |                          |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |
          |     |                          |     |Gatto, Hall, Hill, Lara,  |
          |     |                          |     |Mitchell, Solorio         |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Morrell                   |Nays:|Harkey, Donnelly,         |
          |     |                          |     |Nielsen, Smyth, Wagner    |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Clarifies the definition of "hauling of refuse" for 
          purposes of prevailing wage law.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Provides that "hauling of refuse" includes the hauling of 
            materials other than bona fide commodities sold at fair market 
            value from a public works site.

          2)Specifies that a "bona fide commodity" is a commodity for 
            which there exists a publicly-traded commodity market, such as 
            copper, steel or aluminum.
           
           EXISTING LAW  :

          1) Requires the prevailing wage rate to be paid to all workers 
             on "public works" projects over $1,000.

          2) Defines "public work" to include, among other things, 
             construction, alteration, demolition, installation or repair 
             work done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out 
             of public funds.

          3) Defines "public works" to include the hauling of refuse from 
             a public works site to an outside disposal location, with 
             respect to contracts involving any state agency or any 
             political subdivision of the state.








                                                                  AB 514
                                                                  Page  2



           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, minor, absorbable costs to the Department of 
          Industrial Relations.

           COMMENTS :  As discussed above, existing law defines '"public 
          works" as "Ýc]onstruction, alteration, demolition, installation, 
          or repair work done under contract and paid for in whole or in 
          part out of public funds . . . ." (Labor Code Section 1720).   
          Under Labor Code Section 1720.3, "public works also means the 
          hauling of refuse from a public works site to an outside 
          disposal-location, with respect to contracts involving any state 
          agency?or any political subdivision of the state."

          This bill is jointly sponsored by the California State Building 
          and Construction Trades Council and the California Teamsters 
          Public Affairs Council.  They state that current law guarantees 
          workers employed at public works sites are subject to a 
          prevailing wage for transporting refuse from the work site to an 
          offsite location.  Although the statutory provision exists, the 
          sponsors contend that many workers do not receive the wages they 
          are due as a result of loopholes that circumvent this mandate.

          They contend that some unscrupulous employers have rendered this 
          provision meaningless by selling refuse hauled from public works 
          sites for a nominal fee (an entire load for $1 for example) and 
          then refusing to pay the prevailing wage.  Their rationale is 
          that since the material hauled away had "some value" it was no 
          longer refuse.  Therefore, this bill would ensure that only bona 
          fide commodities sold at fair market value would be deemed not 
          to constitute "refuse."

          Opponents contend that this bill would expand the prevailing 
          wage requirement for public contracts related to the hauling of 
          municipal solid waste.  They argue that this bill could 
          substantially increase the cost of services provided to schools 
          and other public facilities that have not been factored into 
          contractual agreements and would increase the costs of services 
          to public agencies.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091 










                                                                  AB 514
                                                                  Page  3


                                                                FN: 0000690