BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 561|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 561
          Author:   Gorell (R) and Smyth (R)
          Amended:  6/28/11 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 6/22/11
          AYES:  Wolk, Huff, DeSaulnier, Fuller, Hancock, Hernandez, 
            Kehoe, 
          La Malfa, Liu
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 73-0, 05/02/11 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Ventura County Watershed Protection District:  
          indebtedness

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill increases Ventura County Watershed 
          Protection Districts (District) securitized limited 
          obligation note limit and allows the District to 
          participate in state and federal loan programs.

           ANALYSIS  :    Before counties, cities, or school districts 
          can create multi-year general obligation debt, the 
          California Constitution requires that counties and cities 
          receive two-thirds-voter approval and 55 percent 
          voter-approval for school district bonds.  Because the 
          Constitution does not mention special districts, the 
          Legislature has allowed some districts to borrow money 
          without voter approval by issuing "promissory notes," loans 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 561
                                                                Page 
          2

          that are backed only by the promise to repay. 

          Local officials have several fiscal tools to create public 
          capital needed to pay for public works projects:

          1. General obligation bonds are funded through ad valorem 
             tax revenues, outside of Proposition 13's (1978) one 
             percent tax rate.  

          2. Limited obligation bonds are securitized by a local 
             government's existing revenues.  Limited obligation 
             bonds require two-thirds-voter approval. 

          3. Revenue bonds, which are funded by rates and user 
             charges, need majority-voter approval. 

          4. Mello-Roos Act bonds allow counties, cities, special 
             districts, and school districts to levy special taxes 
             (parcel taxes) to finance a wide variety of public works 
             with two-third-voter approval. 

          5. Benefit assessment bonds allow property owners to pay 
             for public improvements.  The amount of the assessment 
             is directly related to the amount of the benefit that 
             the property receives.  Benefit assessments require 
             property owners' approval in weighted ballot elections.

          6. Special districts may issue securitized limited 
             obligation notes (SLONs), which must be secured by 
             pledging a dedicated revenue stream.  Though SLONs don't 
             require voter approval, they need a four-fifths-vote of 
             a district's governing board.  Special districts can 
             borrow up to $2 million to be paid back from designated 
             revenues, over 10 years.  The authority for special 
             districts to issue SLONs sunsets on December 31, 2014 
             (SB 1770 �Senate Local Government Committee], Chapter 
             114, Statutes of 2004). 

          In 1944, the Legislature created the Ventura County Flood 
          Control District, now called the Ventura County Watershed 
          Protection District (AB 2320 �Strickland], Chapter 564, 
          Statutes of 2002).  The District controls and conserves 
          flood, storm waters, and watersheds to protect life, 
          property, and public infrastructure.  The Ventura County 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 561
                                                                Page 
          3

          Board of Supervisors governs the District.

          This bill authorizes the District to participate in state 
          and federal revolving loan funds for the purposes of flood 
          and storm water control, water conservation, erosion 
          protection, beach and shoreline restoration, water 
          reclamation, water storage, technical investigations, and 
          capital works projects.  

          This bill increases the District's promissory note 
          borrowing capacity from $2 million to $13 million.

           Comments
           
          During stressed fiscal times, local governments have fewer 
          resources to allocate to critical infrastructure 
          improvements.  In 2009, 11 District levees failed to meet 
          Federal Levee Certification requirements and must be 
          retrofitted or enhanced.  The District's levees protect 
          more than $8 billion of property and improvements of 
          parcels, and the estimated costs of prevented flood damages 
          are roughly $526 million.  Despite possible fiscal and 
          safety incentives to improve levee systems, the District's 
          steady revenue streams of assessments, property taxes, and 
          land development fees aren't enough.  This bill lets the 
          District participate in state and federal revolving loans, 
          rather than wait for lengthy borrowing procedures.  
          Moreover, this bill raises the cap on the District's SLONs. 
           By giving the District more access to additional 
          borrowing, the bill helps the District prevent damage and 
          stabilize flood insurance rates, rather than wait until a 
          disaster wreaks costlier havoc.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/28/11)

          Association of California Water Agencies
          Calleguas Municipal Water District
          Ventura County Board of Supervisors


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  73-0, 5/2/11

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 561
                                                                Page 
          4

          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Campos, Carter, Chesbro, 
            Conway, Cook, Davis, Dickinson, Donnelly, Feuer, 
            Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Garrick, 
            Gatto, Gordon, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Hall, Harkey, 
            Hayashi, Roger Hern�ndez, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, 
            Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, 
            Mansoor, Miller, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nestande, 
            Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel P�rez, 
            Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, 
            Torres, Valadao, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, 
            John A. P�rez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Charles Calderon, Cedillo, Eng, Gorell, 
            Lara, Mendoza, Vacancy


          AGB:kc  6/28/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****























                                                           CONTINUED