BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 636
                                                                  Page 1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 636 (Knight)
          As Amended  May 9, 2011
          Majority vote 

           VETERANS AFFAIRS    7-0         HIGHER EDUCATION    9-0       
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Cook, Pan, Atkins, Block, |Ayes:|Block, Donnelly,          |
          |     |Nielsen, Williams, Yamada |     |Achadjian, Brownley,      |
          |     |                          |     |Fong, Galgiani, Lara,     |
          |     |                          |     |Miller, Portantino        |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS           17-0                               
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |     |                          |
          |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |     |                          |
          |     |Davis, Donnelly, Gatto,   |     |                          |
          |     |Hall, Hill, Lara,         |     |                          |
          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Norby, |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Revises the conditions of tuition and fee refund for a 
          student who withdraws from an academic institution due to active 
          military service.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Requires the higher education institution to provide, at the 
            student's election, a refund of tuition and fees paid for the 
            academic term in which the student is required to report for 
            military service, regardless of the institution's withdraw 
            date. 

          2)Removes the provisions granting a credit option to the 
            withdrawing student.
             
           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Provides certain protections for members of the National Guard 
            ordered into active state service by the Governor or active 








                                                                  AB 636
                                                                  Page 2


            federal service by the President of the United States for 
            emergency purposes, and for reservists called to active duty, 
            as specified.  

          2)Requires academic institutions to grant a student a military 
            leave of absence, and at the student's election, credit the 
            student's tuition and fee charges toward a subsequent academic 
            term, or grant a refund of tuition and fees paid by the 
            student for the academic term.  

          3)States that to receive a credit or refund, the student must 
            withdraw from the institution by a specified date.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, moderate annual tuition and fee revenue loss, 
          potentially in excess of $150,000, depending on deployment needs 
          and number of service persons attending community colleges, 
          California State University and University of California to 
          provide additional refunds to students deployed after a school's 
          specified withdrawal deadline.  For example, should this bill 
          affect 125 community college students and 25 CSU students in a 
          given year, the cost for refunds or credit would be about 
          $160,000. 

           COMMENTS  :   It is equitable in the context of most students at 
          academic institutions to require that they withdraw by a 
          specified date in order to receive a refund or credit of tuition 
          and fees paid.  A school reasonably requires a deadline by which 
          students must commit to a course or courses for reasons ranging 
          from logistics issues (e.g., crowding, staffing, accounting) to 
          preserving academic integrity.  

          In contrast, a military student ordered to active service has no 
          control over the timing of the student's withdrawal from an 
          institution.  Students may have short notice times before they 
          must report for duty and/or deploy and much to do as they 
          transition from part-time to active duty military life.  Such 
          students are withdrawing because the state or nation requires 
          their service.  Students in the circumstances contemplated by 
          this bill are highly unlikely to be manipulating the academic 
          system; they are being ordered to active service.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :    John Spangler / V. A. / (916) 319-3550 








                                                                  AB 636
                                                                  Page 3




                                                                    FN: 
                                       0000882