BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 642
                                                                  Page 1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 642 (Charles Calderon)
          As Amended  April 27, 2011
          Majority vote 

           NATURAL RESOURCES   8-0         UTILITIES & COMMERCE       15-0 
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Chesbro, Knight,          |Ayes:|Bradford, Fletcher,       |
          |     |Brownley, Dickinson,      |     |Buchanan,                 |
          |     |Grove, Halderman,         |     |Fong, Fuentes, Furutani,  |
          |     |Monning, Skinner          |     |Achadjian, Roger          |
          |     |                          |     |Hern�ndez, Huffman,       |
          |     |                          |     |Knight, Ma, Nestande,     |
          |     |                          |     |Skinner, Swanson, Valadao |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      17-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |     |                          |
          |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |     |                          |
          |     |Davis, Donnelly, Gatto,   |     |                          |
          |     |Hall, Hill, Lara,         |     |                          |
          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Smyth, |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Specifies that the State Lands Commission (SLC) may 
          enter into a lease for the development of algae-producing energy 
          and agricultural products and that biomass includes algae for 
          the purpose of receiving funding from the Renewable Resources 
          Trust Fund (Fund) or the California Alternative Energy and 
          Advanced Transportation Financing Authority (Authority).  

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Provides that SLC has exclusive jurisdiction and leasing 
            authority over all public trust lands owned by the state.  
            Public trust lands generally consist of tide and submerged 
            lands and beds of navigable channels, streams, rivers, creeks, 








                                                                  AB 642
                                                                  Page 2


            lakes, bays, and inlets.

          2)Protects the public's right to use California's public trust 
            lands for commerce, navigation, fishing, boating, natural 
            habitat protection, and other water oriented activities.  

          3)Requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to optimize 
            public investment and ensure that the most cost-effective and 
            efficient investments in renewable energy resources are 
            vigorously pursued.

          4)Establishes the Fund, which is administered by CEC and funded 
            by the renewable energy public goods charge.  A portion of the 
            Fund is to be used for programs that are designed to achieve 
            fully competitive and self-sustaining existing in-state 
            renewable electricity generation facilities (e.g., facilities 
            that use biomass energy).

          5)Establishes the Authority, which provides bond financing for 
            facilities that use alternative energy sources (e.g., biomass 
            energy).

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, negligible costs, if any.

           COMMENTS  :  Algae are attracting attention as a renewable energy 
          source because the strains can potentially produce 10 or more 
          times more fuel per acre than the corn used to make ethanol or 
          the soybeans used to make biodiesel.  Unlike row crops, algae 
          growth is not dependent on a particular season.  Moreover, algae 
          can grow in seawater, but can also thrive in desert ponds, using 
          high-saline water from aquifers that cannot otherwise be used.  
          Many species of algae can even grow in wastewater from treatment 
          plants and water that contains nitrates, phosphates, and other 
          contaminants.  Algae are also a consumer of carbon dioxide. 
           
           Particular focus has been placed on the use of algae for jet 
          fuel.  At least one major airplane company has stated that 
          commercial airlines may derive 1% of their fuel by 2015 from 
          biofuels made of plants including algae.  The Navy is currently 
          testing both ships and aircraft on algae-based fuels.

          The need for and effect of this bill is unclear.  Under existing 
          law, SLC has broad authority to enter into leases.  This would 








                                                                  AB 642
                                                                  Page 3


          include algae production, although such a lease has never been 
          proposed.  This bill's SLC lease provisions are consistent with 
          current law and may be considered a clarification of SLC's 
          authority with respect to algae, but do not appear to make any 
          substantive change to SLC's authority.

          Under existing law governing the Fund and Authority, "biomass" 
          is an eligible renewable energy resource for funding purposes.  
          Biomass is not specifically defined to include or exclude algae, 
          and it seems to go without saying that algae are biomass.  There 
          is no known evidence that the question has ever come up at the 
          CEC or the Authority.  The effect of clarifying that "algae" are 
          biomass is unclear.  
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Mario DeBernardo / NAT. RES. / (916) 
          319-2092 


                                                               FN:  0000816