BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 665
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 4, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 665 (Torres) - As Amended: April 12, 2011
Policy Committee: Public Safety
Vote: 7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill makes a subsequent conviction for misdemeanor peeping
(PC 647(j)), with the naked eye or with the use of a camera or a
scope, punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a fine of up
to $2,000.
(Current law makes a first and any subsequent conviction for PC
647(j) by up to six months in county jail and/or a fine of up to
$1,000.)
FISCAL EFFECT
Unknown, likely minor non-state-reimbursable local incarceration
costs, to the extent these offenders actually serve more time in
county jail - most likely receive probation - offset to a degree
by increased fine revenue.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale. The author contends this offense warrants a stiffer
penalty for repeat offenses and that the increased penalty
will serve as a deterrent.
2)Concerns . In general there is little evidence that penalty
increases deter criminal behavior.
3)Related Legislation .
a) AB 708 (Knight), which passed this committee April 13,
allows a criminal complaint charging PC Sec 647(j) to be
filed within one year of the date a hidden recording is
AB 665
Page 2
discovered.
b) SB 248 (Wyland), which failed passage in Senate Public
Safety April 5, required a person convicted of violating PC
647(j) to provide a sample for DNA testing.
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081