BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                          AB 684 (Block)
          
          Hearing Date: 08/15/2011        Amended: 08/15/2011
          Consultant: Jacqueline Wong-HernandezPolicy Vote: Education 9-0, 
          E&CA: 4-0
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY: AB 684 authorizes the local governing board of a 
          community college district (CCD) to change election systems in 
          accordance with the bill's provisions and the California Voting 
          Rights Act of 2001 (CVRA). This bill specifically provides for 
          the number and election of members, and the reapportionment of 
          trustee areas for the governing board of the Grossmont-Cuyamaca 
          CCD.
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2011-12      2012-13       2013-14     Fund
                                                                      
          CCD waiver authority               Potentially significant 
          one-time savings           Local

          Grossmont/Cuyamaca             Local request; non-reimbursable 
          costs             Local  
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: 
          
          The CVRA provides that an at-large method of election may not be 
          imposed or applied in a manner that impairs the ability of a 
          protected class (as defined by the federal Voting Rights Act) to 
          elect candidates of its choice or its ability to influence the 
          outcome of an election, as a result of the dilution or the 
          abridgment of the rights of voters who are members of a 
          protected class. If such a violation of the CVRA is alleged, an 
          individual or group can sue the entity that oversees the 
          at-large election method; in this case, individuals can sue a 
          CCD. Upon a finding of a violation of the CVRA, the court would 
          (and has in cases against local government entities) implement 
          appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based 
          elections that are tailored to remedy the violation. Courts 








          AB 684 (Block)
          Page 1


          frequently award the prevailing party legal fees, as well.

          In order for a CCD that uses an at-large election system to 
          switch election systems to trustee area elections (for any 
          reason, including a belief that it may be in violation of the 
          CVRA), it must hold an election to authorize the change in 
          election systems. K-12 schools can request a waiver of this 
          requirement from the State Board of Education (for local school 
          board elections) and avoid the cost of an election in order to 
          come into compliance with the CVRA. Community colleges do not 
          have a clear option for requesting a waiver, though the State 
          Board of Education has granted at least one to a county office 
          of education on behalf of a CCD.

          Allowing the governing board of a CCD to grant a waiver to avoid 
          the preliminary election would save election (and related) costs 
          for the CCD. Staff notes that even in the event of an election 
          to approve an election system change, the voters could reject 
          the change. If a CCD was in violation of the CVRA and the voters 
          rejected its proposal to change election systems, it would 
          likely be subject to litigation and lose. The CCD would likely 
          be responsible for changing the system anyway, and for the 
          plaintiff's legal fees. This bill would allow community college 
          districts to avoid costly elections and potential litigation 
          costs.

          This bill requires the Grossmont-Cuyamaca CCD to change from an 
          at-large trustee election system to a trustee area election 
          system. It specifies the procedure by which this must occur, and 
          requirements of the new system. While the other provisions of 
          this bill are permissive for all CCDs, this provision presents a 
          new state mandate on the Grossmont-Cuyamaca CCD. This mandate is 
          not, however, reimbursable because it is being proposed at the 
          request of the local governing body upon which it would be 
          imposed. The governing board of the Grossmont-Cuyamaca CCD 
          adopted a resolution in February 2011 expressing its need for 
          special legislation in order to begin to implement its planned 
          election system change, and proposing that legislation be 
          sought. The CCD has also provided this committee with a letter 
          indicating that it has requested the introduction of AB 684's 
          provisions regarding its CCD and acknowledging that it will bear 
          all costs related to changing to a trustee area election system 
          as specified in the legislation. 









          AB 684 (Block)
          Page 2