BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 689
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 13, 2011

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON INSURANCE
                                 Jose Solorio, Chair
                  AB 689 (Blumenfield) - As Amended:  March 31, 2011
           
          SUBJECT  :   Insurance: annuity transactions

           SUMMARY  :   Requires that insurance producers and insurers 
          selling annuities have reasonable grounds to believe that their 
          recommendations are suitable for consumers, and adopts a 
          regulatory process to enforce this requirement.  Specifically, 
           this bill  :

          1)States its purpose to require insurers to establish a system 
            to supervise recommendations and to set forth standards and 
            procedures for recommendations to consumers that result in 
            transactions involving annuity products, so that the insurance 
            needs and financial objectives of consumers at the time of the 
            transaction are appropriately addressed.

          2)Requires the insurance producer and the insurer when 
            recommending to a consumer the purchase or exchange of an 
            annuity to have reasonable grounds for believing that the 
            recommendation is suitable for the consumer.  This belief 
            shall be based on the facts disclosed by the consumer as to 
            his or her investments and other insurance products and as to 
            his or her financial situation and needs, including the 
            consumer's suitability information, and that there is a 
            reasonable basis to believe all of the following:

               a)     The consumer has been reasonably informed of various 
                 features of the annuity, such as the potential surrender 
                 period and surrender charge, potential tax penalty if the 
                 consumer sells, exchanges, surrenders, or annuitizes the 
                 annuity, mortality and expense fees, investment advisory 
                 fees, potential charges for riders, limitations on 
                 interest returns, insurance and investment components, 
                 and market risk.

               b)     The consumer would receive a tangible net benefit 
                 from the transaction.

               c)     The particular annuity including subaccounts and 
                 riders are suitable for this particular consumer.








                                                                 AB 689
                                                                  Page  2


               d)     In the case of an exchange or replacement of an 
                 annuity, the exchange or replacement is suitable by 
                 considering all of the following: (i) surrender charges, 
                 a new surrender period, the loss of existing benefits, 
                 any increased fees; (ii) whether the consumer would 
                 benefit from product enhancements and improvements; and 
                 (iii) whether the consumer has had another annuity 
                 exchange or replacement within the preceding 60 months.

          3)Defines "annuity" as an insurance product under California law 
            that is individually solicited, whether the product is 
            classified as an individual or group annuity.

          4)Defines "insurance producer" as a person required to be 
            licensed under California law to sell, solicit, or negotiate 
            insurance, including annuities.  

          5)Defines "suitability information" as information that is 
            reasonably appropriate to determine the suitability of a 
            recommendation, including all of the following:  age, annual 
            income, financial situation and needs, financial experience, 
            financial objectives, intended use of the annuity, financial 
            time horizon, existing assets including investment and life 
            insurance holdings, liquidity needs, liquid net worth, risk 
            tolerance, tax status, and whether or not the consumer has a 
            reverse mortgage.

          6)Requires an insurance producer or insurer to make reasonable 
            efforts to obtain the consumer's suitability information prior 
            to the execution of the purchase, exchange or replacement of 
            an annuity resulting from a recommendation.

          7)Provides, with specified exceptions, that an insurer shall not 
            issue an annuity recommended to a consumer unless there is a 
            reasonable basis to believe the annuity is suitable based on 
            the consumer's suitability information.  In no event shall an 
            insurance producer or insurer recommend to a person 65 years 
            or older the sale of annuity to replace an existing annuity 
            that requires the insured to pay a surrender charge for the 
            annuity that is being replaced, where purchase of the annuity 
            does not confer a substantial financial benefit over the life 
            of the policy, so that a reasonable person would believe the 
            purchase is unnecessary.









                                                                  AB 689
                                                                  Page  3

          8)Provides that neither an insurance producer nor an insurer 
            shall have any obligation to a consumer, pursuant to this bill 
            and related to an annuity transaction, if any of the following 
            occur:  (a) no recommendation is made, (b) a recommendation 
            was made and later found to have been prepared based on 
            materially inaccurate information provided by the consumer, 
            (c) a consumer refuses to provide relevant suitability 
            information and the annuity transaction is not recommended, 
            (d) a consumer decides to enter into an annuity transaction 
            that is not based on a recommendation of the insurer or the 
            insurance producer.

          9)Specifies that, unless otherwise specifically included, this 
            bill shall not apply to the following transactions: (a) direct 
            response solicitations when no recommendation is based on 
            information collected from the consumer, or (b) contracts used 
            to fund employee pension or welfare benefit plans covered 
            under the federal ERISA law, 401(k) plans, government or 
            church plans, tax exempt organizations under Section 457 of 
            the Internal Revenue Code, a nonqualified deferred 
            compensation arrangement maintained by an employer or plan 
            sponsor, settlements associated with personal injury 
            litigation or a claim resolution process, or formal prepaid 
            funeral contracts.

          10)Requires an insurance producer at the time of sale to do all 
            of the following (or where no insurance producer is involved, 
            the responsible insurer representative):

               a)     Make a record of any recommendation to a consumer to 
                 purchase or exchange an annuity.

               b)     Obtain a customer-signed statement documenting the 
                 customer's refusal to provide suitability information, if 
                 any.

               c)     Obtain a customer-signed statement acknowledging 
                 that an annuity transaction is not recommended if the 
                 customer decides to enter into an annuity transaction 
                 that is not based on the insurance producer's or 
                 insurer's recommendation.

          11)Requires an insurer to establish a supervision system that is 
            reasonably designed to achieve the insurer's and its insurance 
            producer's compliance with this bill, including all of the 








                                                                  AB 689
                                                                  Page  4

            following:

               a)     The insurer shall use reasonable procedures to 
                 inform its insurance producers of the requirements of 
                 this bill and incorporate these requirements into 
                 insurance producer training manuals.

               b)     The insurer shall establish standards for insurance 
                 producer product training and require specified training.

               c)     The insurer shall maintain and use procedures for 
                 review of each recommendation prior to issuance of an 
                 annuity that are designed to ensure that there is a 
                 reasonable basis to determine that a recommendation is 
                 suitable.

               d)     The insurer shall maintain reasonable procedures to 
                 detect recommendations that are not suitable.

          12)Specifies that an insurer shall be responsible for taking 
            appropriate corrective action in connection with the 
            performance of functions required by this bill, and is 
            responsible for the compliance of its insurance producers.   
           
          13)Prohibits an insurance producer from soliciting the sale of 
            an annuity product unless the insurance producer has adequate 
            knowledge of the product to recommend the annuity and the 
            insurance producer is in compliance with the insurer's 
            standards for product training.  

          14)Specifies both the required hours of training and the topics 
            to be covered in the training of insurance producers.

          15)Requires an insurer to verify that an insurance producer has 
            completed the annuity training required by this bill before 
            allowing the producer to sell an annuity product for the 
            insurer.

          16)Makes an insurer responsible for compliance with this 
            article.  If a violation occurs, either because of the action 
            or inaction of the insurer or its insurance producer, the 
            Insurance Commissioner (IC) may, in addition to other 
            available penalties or remedies, order any of the following:

               a)     An insurer to take reasonable appropriate corrective 








                                                                  AB 689
                                                                  Page  5

                 action for any consumer harmed by the insurer's, or its 
                 insurance producer's, violation of this bill.

               b)     A managing general agent or an insurance producer to 
                 take reasonably appropriate corrective action for any 
                 consumer harmed by the insurance producer's violation of 
                 this bill.

               c)     Administrative penalties and sanctions ranging from 
                 $1,000 to $300,000 for each violation, depending on 
                 whether a person or an insurer commits the violation and 
                 if it is the first or a frequent violation.  

          17)Requires insurers and insurance producers to maintain or be 
            able to make available to the IC records of the information 
            collected from the consumer and other information used in 
            making the recommendations that were the basis for insurance 
            transactions for five years.  The records may be maintained in 
            paper, photographic, microprocess, magnetic, mechanical, or 
            electronic media, or by any other process that accurately 
            reproduces the actual document.

          18)Requires the IC, after notice and hearing, to adopt 
            reasonable rules and regulations as are necessary to 
            administer this bill.  The IC would be authorized to adopt 
            regulations not inconsistent with this bill pursuant to a 
            section of the federal law known as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street 
            Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 111-203).

           EXISTING LAW:

           1)Requires life insurers selling life insurance and annuity 
            policies through the use of agents to require with completed 
            applications a statement signed by the agent as to whether he 
            or she knows replacement is involved in the transaction, and 
            if replacement is involved, the insurer must require: a) a 
            list of all of the applicant's existing life insurance or 
            annuity policies to be replaced, b) a copy of a specified 
            replacement notice, and c) a written notice that the applicant 
            has a right for 30 days to an unconditional refund of all 
            premiums paid.
           
           2)Establishes the Life and Annuity Consumer Protection Fund 
            within the Insurance Fund for the purpose of protecting 
            consumers of life insurance and annuity products.  This fund 








                                                                  AB 689
                                                                  Page  6

            is authorized up to $5 million annually and is financed from 
            fees levied on admitted insurers.  The Department of Insurance 
            (DOI) distributes the proceeds from the fund for: a) DOI's 
            investigations and prosecutions of financial abuse, to respond 
            to consumer inquiries and complaints, to educate consumers, 
            and to regulate life insurance and annuity products including 
            advertising; and b) for district attorneys to investigate and 
            prosecute individual life insurance and annuity product 
            financial abuse.  

          3)Prohibits the sale of annuities to seniors where the purpose 
            of the sale is to affect Medi-Cal eligibility and the 
            purchaser would already qualify for Medi-Cal, or the 
            purchaser's assets are less than the community resource 
            allowance established by the Department of Health Services, or 
            after the purchase, the purchaser or the purchaser's spouse 
            would not qualify for Medi-Cal.

          4)Requires that life agents complete eight hours of training 
            prior to selling individual annuities to consumers and four 
            hours of training every two years prior to license renewal, in 
            courses approved by the IC.

          5)Prohibits the replacement of an existing insurance policy by 
            the use of a materially inaccurate presentation that 
            recommends that a senior citizen purchase an unnecessary 
            replacement annuity and prescribes the administrative 
            penalties for violating this law.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Undetermined.

           



          COMMENTS  :
           
          1)Background.   The author states that this bill builds on, and 
            in some sections exceeds, the requirements set forth in the 
            2010 National Association of Insurance Commissioners' (NAIC) 
            Annuity Suitability Model Regulation, which was created as a 
            result of national-level discussions regarding annuity 
            suitability requirements.  It is also the author's intent to 
            conform to existing California law and provide additional 
            consumer safeguards.








                                                                  AB 689
                                                                  Page  7


          The author states this bill is needed because annuities are 
            often complex long-term insurance products in which the 
            premium monies invested are unavailable for many years and the 
            withdrawal of funds from annuities frequently involves the 
            payment of large penalties.  It is therefore necessary that 
            the consumer understands the implications of purchasing an 
            annuity and that the insurer and producer make a reasonable 
            determination that the sale of the annuity is suitable for the 
            consumer's financial circumstances and investment objectives 
            at the time the annuity is sold to the consumer, and prior to 
            the insurer's issuance of the contract.
           
          2)Support.   According to the author and Insurance Commissioner 
            Jones, currently there is no clearly stated requirement in 
            California law that an insurance producer must make a 
            reasonable determination that an annuity is suitable for a 
            consumer prior to the consumer purchasing it, nor is there a 
            law that requires an insurer to determine that an annuity is 
            suitable for the purchaser before issuing it.  The author and 
            the Commissioner also state that there is no law requiring 
            that insurers and producers collect information regarding 
            specified criteria that must be considered in determining 
            whether an annuity is suitable for a consumer's financial 
            situation, such as the consumer's financial objectives, 
            financial time horizon, liquidity needs, existing needs, and 
            whether or not the consumer has a reverse mortgage.  
            Accordingly, the state should establish appropriate safeguards 
            to protect consumers from costly unsuitable annuity purchases.

          The author and the Insurance Commissioner further state that the 
            federal Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 
            Act indicates that the states should preserve their sole 
            authority over regulating fixed annuities by adopting 
            comprehensive suitability standards for annuity sales that 
            meet or exceed the 2010 NAIC Model Regulation by June 6, 2013, 
            in order to avoid federal dual authority/oversight of fixed 
            annuities with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  
            Therefore, California must set annuity suitability 
            requirements in order to preserve the state's current 
            exemption from federal regulation.  The author states that 
            Dodd-Frank makes clear that the NAIC Annuity Suitability Model 
            Regulation establishes a "floor" of minimum requirements, 
            allowing states such as California to impose additional 
            requirements consistent with their state laws and offer 








                                                                  AB 689
                                                                  Page  8

            additional protections to consumers.

          The California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR), which 
            supports the bill if amended, states that this bill excludes 
            certain types of contracts such as employee pensions, 401(k) 
            plans, government or church plans, and deferred compensation 
            plans.  CANHR proposes that insurers should be required to 
            provide consumers purchasing these excluded annuities with a 
            comprehensive annuity suitability checklist and 
            self-evaluation worksheet.
          
          3)Opposition.   Life insurers and producers oppose the bill 
            unless amended, and state that this bill differs from the 
            NAIC's Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model in several 
            sections.  The foremost concern is that the bill does not 
            follow the NAIC model in recognizing the regulation of the 
            federal Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over 
            products sold by brokers and dealers.  The opposition states 
            that the FINRA rules mirror the provisions in the NAIC model, 
            and avoids duplicative and possibly conflicting 
            interpretations of two sets of rules.  Unless this bill is 
            amended to avoid this conflict, these insurers will retain 
            their opposition.

          The opposition has proposed adoption of the NAIC Model's FINRA 
            provision, which the author has not agreed to.  If the FINRA 
            amendment were made as proposed by the opposition, the author 
            and some proponents have expressed concern that existing 
            consumer protections of state law would be lost.  To address 
            that concern, if a FINRA amendment is adopted an additional 
            provision needs to be added to clarify that existing state 
            laws providing consumer protections would be retained.  

          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Congress of California Seniors
          Insurance Commissioner Jones, Department of Insurance
          Law Offices of Senior Citizens Legal Services
          Professional Fiduciary Association of California
          SEIU Local 1000

           Support if Amended
           








                                                                  AB 689
                                                                  Page  9

          California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform

           Oppose Unless Amended 
           
          American Council of Life Insurers
          Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies
          MetLife
          National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Manny Hernandez / INS. / (916) 319-2086