BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 727
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 18, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 727 (Mitchell) - As Amended:  April 25, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Business and 
          Professions  Vote:                            5-4

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill increases the percentage of food and beverage items 
          sold from vending machines on state property that must meet 
          specified nutritional standards and requires state cafeterias 
          and concessions to enhance nutritional standards. Specifically, 
          this bill:

          1)Increases, from 35% for food items and one-third for beverage, 
            to 50% by January 1, 2014, and to 100% by January 1, 2016, the 
            percentage of food items and beverage items offered for sale 
            in vending machines on state property that are required to 
            meet "accepted nutritional guidelines" as defined in current 
            law and modified in this bill.

          2)Requires, beginning January 1, 2014, food sold at food 
            concessions and cafeterias in state-owned or leased-buildings 
            to at least meet food and nutrition guidelines for concessions 
            as determined by the specified federal agencies.

          3)Requires the Department of General Services (DGS), when 
            approving contracts for food to be sold at concessions, 
            cafeterias, and vending operations on state-owned and 
            state-leased buildings to give preference to:

             a)   Food items grown, packaged, or produced in California.

             b)   Purchasing food items meeting sustainability guidelines 
               as determined by specified federal agencies.

          4)Requires DGS, when performing the function in (3), to not 
            include disincentives for purchasing food items meeting the 








                                                                  AB 727
                                                                  Page  2

            criteria of (3)(a) or (3)(b).

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)DGS will incur one-time costs of about $80,000 to modify food 
            contract specifications and to disseminate nutritional 
            guidelines for food purchasing, and ongoing costs of at least 
            $150,000 regarding enhanced oversight and compliance with food 
            purchasing and vending contracts, including vendor and 
            contractor protests concerning compliance.

          2)The state Department of Rehabilitation (DOR) administers the 
            operation of concessions, including vending machines located 
            on state property through the Business Enterprise Program 
            (BEP) and through a contracting program. Concessions are 
            operated by blind vendors. Revenues are deposited into the 
            Vending Stand Fund (VSF) and the BEP Vending Machine Account 
            (BEVMA) in the Special Deposit Fund. The program currently 
            encompasses 3,300 vending machines at 474 state-owned or 
            -leased properties. This includes 151 sites where 57 BEP 
            vendors provide direct concession services, including vending 
            machines.

            The increased restrictions on the types of foods and beverages 
            allowed to be sold could impact sales volumes and revenues 
            into the VSF and the BEVMA. A 25% loss of sales could result 
            revenue losses of $750,000 to the VSF and $90,000 to the 
            BEVMA. In addition, the DOR would incur increased 
            administrative costs for monitoring and compliance with the 
            content requirements.

          3)Departments with large food service operations, such as the 
            Departments of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Mental 
            Health could see significant increased food costs.

           COMMENTS  

          1)Purpose. According to the author, "AB 727 will require the 
            state to provide healthier food options in vending machines, 
            concessions and cafeterias located in state buildings, based 
            on nutritional standards established within the "Health and 
            Sustainability Guidelines for Federal Concessions and Vending 
            Operations" by DHHS and U.S. GSA."

           2)In support  , the Consumers Union states, "California is 








                                                                  AB 727
                                                                  Page  3

            uniquely positioned to establish a model for other states, and 
            other government entities, in making the nutritious food 
            option the easy one?Adopting food procurement policies for 
            state buildings that emphasize nutritious offerings will 
            broaden healthy choices for state workers and visitors to 
            state-run facilities.  Healthy procurement policies for all 
            state buildings will help promote obesity prevention and 
            thereby support reduction of the ever-upward spiraling health 
            system costs for obesity-associated disease."

           3)Prior Legislation  . SB 441 (Torlakson)/Chapter 597 of 2008, 
            requires vendors operating vending machines on state property 
            to offer in any machine at least 35% of food items and at 
            least one-third of beverages that meet "accepted nutritional 
            guidelines," as defined.

           4)Opposition  . The California Automatic Vendors Council is 
            opposed to the increases to 50% and 100% for nutritional 
            products, fearing a resulting loss of revenue.

           5)How much is enough  ? Since state law already requires at least 
            one-third of the food and beverage choices in state vending 
            machines to meet certain nutritional standards, is it 
            necessary to further limit the choices made by those (mainly 
            adults) who use those machines, and might not many 
            individuals, when faced with more limited choices at state 
            facilities, simply go across the street to buy what they want?

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081