BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 750|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 750
          Author:   Hueso (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/15/11 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE BANKING & FINANCIAL INST. COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 7/6/11
          AYES:  Vargas, Evans, Kehoe, Liu, Padilla
          NOES:  Blakeslee, Walters
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  50-24, 6/1/11 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Finance:  Investment Trust Blue Ribbon Task 
          Force

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill establishes the Investment Trust Blue 
          Ribbon Task Force, as specified, to study the creation of a 
          state bank.  

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Authorizes the establishment and operation of 
             state-chartered banks, state-chartered credit unions, 
             state-chartered industrial loan companies, and 
             state-chartered savings associations, all of which are 
             overseen by the Department of Financial Institutions, 
             and allows for the operation of federally-chartered 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 750
                                                                Page 
          2

             depository institutions and foreign (out-of-state) 
             depository institutions in California, as specified.  

          2. Provides for the California Infrastructure and Economic 
             Development Bank (I-Bank), within the Business, 
             Transportation and Housing Agency (BT&H) (Government 
             Code Section 63000 et seq.).  I-Bank is headed by a 
             five-member Board of Directors that includes the 
             Secretary of BT&H, State Treasurer, Secretary of the 
             State and Consumer Services Agency, and Director of the 
             Department of Finance, or their designees, and a 
             Governor's appointee.  I-Bank was created in 1994 to 
             promote economic revitalization, enable future 
             development, and encourage a healthy climate for jobs in 
             California.  I-Bank has broad authority to issue 
             tax-exempt and taxable revenue bonds, provide financing 
             to public agencies, provide credit enhancements, acquire 
             or lease facilities, and leverage state and federal 
             funds.  I-Bank's current programs include the 
             Infrastructure State Revolving Fund (ISRF) Program, 
             501(c)(3) Revenue Bond Program, Industrial Development 
             Revenue Bond Program, Exempt Facility Revenue Bond 
             Program and Governmental Bond Program (see 
             http://www.ibank.ca.gov/about_us.htm for more details).

          This bill:

          1. Establishes the Investment Trust Blue Ribbon Task Force 
             (Task Force), for the purpose of considering the 
             viability of establishing the California Investment 
             Trust, which would be a state bank receiving deposits of 
             state funds.

          2. Requires the Task Force to be convened by the Secretary 
             of BT&H, and provide it with a 13-person membership, 
             including all of the following:

                   The Secretary of BT&H or his/her designee.

                   Five individuals representing and having a 
                background in one or more areas of finance, 
                including, but not limited to working in for-profit 
                and nonprofit financial and academic institutions, 
                local government finances or economic development; 







                                                                AB 750
                                                                Page 
          3

                these five would include one appointed by the Senate 
                Rules Committee, one appointed by the Speaker of the 
                State Assembly, and three appointed by the Governor.

                   The State Controller, State Treasurer, and 
                Governor, or their designees.  

          3. Require the Task Force to convene its initial meeting on 
             or before February 1, 2012.

          4. Requires the Task Force to do all of the following:

             A.    Undertake a general assessment of the state's 
                current network of public and private financial 
                resources and assess the impact on government 
                services, including public and private banking 
                services, for the purpose of identifying potential 
                areas of state trust focus.  At a minimum, the task 
                force would have to consider how a state trust could 
                be designed to strengthen the economic and community 
                development needs of California, provide greater 
                financial stability to businesses through its 
                investments in other financial institutions, reduce 
                the cost paid by state government for banking 
                services, and generate earnings beyond those 
                necessary for continued operation of the trust, which 
                could be used to supplement the General Fund.

             B.    Support a strong private sector financial 
                community that will provide capital for businesses in 
                California.

             C.    Examine various administrative and operational 
                structures for organizing a trust, including, but not 
                limited to, boards of directors, sources of deposits, 
                oversight and audit of financial activities, and 
                guarantees of financial products.

             D.    Consider options for integrating a state trust 
                model into the existing state financial resource 
                network, including, but not limited to, ideas such as 
                lending capital to banks, credit unions, and 
                nonprofit community development financial 
                institutions.  







                                                                AB 750
                                                                Page 
          4


          5. Requires the Task Force, upon an agreement by at least 
             two-thirds of the membership, to select a nonprofit 
             corporation or other private organization with specific 
             expertise in public finance and public institutions 
             models to staff the Task Force.  Authorizes the Task 
             Force to establish an advisory committee to help it in 
             creating its final report.  The final report, 
             representing the views of a majority of the Task Force 
             members, must be submitted to the Legislature by 
             December 1, 2012, and must include all of the following, 
             at a minimum:

             A.    A recommendation on the viability of establishing 
                the California Investment Trust and its impact on 
                state government services, including public and 
                private banking services.

             B.    A list of the issues identified during its work 
                and its findings, if any, related to those issues.

             C.    To the extent the task force is supportive of 
                establishing the California Investment Trust, 
                information on all of the following, at a minimum:  
                the administrative structure of the trust, the 
                capital requirements for the trust's initial 
                capitalization and for ongoing operations, how the 
                initial capitalization can be achieved and how 
                operating costs could be paid, how the trust can 
                protect the interests of the state and the rights of 
                individuals and entities that access products or 
                services of the trust, transition actions necessary 
                to establish the trust, and statutory and 
                constitutional changes that may be necessary to 
                establish the trust.  

           Background 

           This bill is sponsored by the author, to study the 
          viability of creating a California state bank other than 
          the I-Bank.  To date, 13 other states have introduced 
          legislation to create a state bank or to study the creation 
          of a state bank.  With this bill, California became the 
          14th such state.  







                                                                AB 750
                                                                Page 
          5


          Much of the push to create state banks traces to the Public 
          Banking Institute (PBI), based in Sonoma.  According to its 
          Internet Web site:

            "PBI is a non-partisan think-tank, research and advisory 
            organization dedicated to exploring and disseminating 
            information on the potential utility of publicly-owned 
            banks, and to facilitate their implementation.  PBI was 
            formed in 2011 as an educational non-profit organization 
            by a group of citizens including past and present 
            community and civic leaders, businesspeople, educators, 
            political economists, writers, and banking and other 
            professionals.  The group shares a concern over the 
            destabilizing actions of a private banking industry that, 
            through its corporate business model, has precipitated 
            the economic imbalances now witnessed across the US 
            economy.

            "PBI's mission is to analyze U.S. and global financial 
            events in order to explore and facilitate implementation 
            of public banking options.  In the process, we are 
            looking to quantify the true costs of financing 
            government and public services, including the costs of 
            potential systemic risk, business cyclicality, and 
            monetary instability imposed by particular methods of 
            banking and government financing. 

            "Our goal is to leverage the historic role of 
            publicly-owned banks nationally and internationally in 
            fostering access to cheap and readily available credit, 
            particularly as used for increasing productive capacity."

          In March 2011, representatives of PBI made a presentation 
          in the State Capitol, touting the benefits of a state bank. 
           During their presentation, they described the success of 
          the only state bank in the country (the Bank of North 
          Dakota, which was formed in 1919 with $2 million in 
          capital, and which now operates with more than $270 million 
          in state capital, and runs a profit used to augment North 
          Dakota's General Fund).  They also made several claims that 
          warrant further investigation, such as the claim that a 
          state bank can "create money" by leveraging its deposits 
          and that a state bank has access to nearly unlimited 







                                                                AB 750
                                                                Page 
          6

          borrowing through the Federal Reserve Bank's overnight 
          lending window.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

             Major Provisions                2011-12     2012-13    
             2013-14               Fund  

            Task Force study              unknown, potentially 
            several             Private
                                hundred thousand
           
           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/8/11)

          California Association of County Treasurers and Tax 
          Collectors
          California Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit 
          Union
          California Conference of Machinists
          California Labor Federation
          California Nurses Association
          California Professional Firefighters
          California School Employees Association
          California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
          Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, District 9
          Engineers and Scientists of California
          Fairfax Town Council
          International Longshore and Warehouse Union
          Professional and Technical Engineers, Local 21
          SEIU California
          UNITE HERE!
          United Food and Commercial Workers - Western States 
          Conference
          United Steelworkers
          Utility Workers Union of America, Local 132

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  9/8/11)

          California Bankers Association







                                                                AB 750
                                                                Page 
          7


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The California Association of 
          County Treasurers and Tax Collectors (CACTTC) believes that 
          the concept of a state bank merits serious consideration 
          and study.  A state bank could offer a new option for 
          county treasuries, and could also be a major partner to 
          local treasurers.  CACTTC believes that a county treasurer 
          could bring an important local agency perspective to the 
          task force and requests that the author consider including 
          a county treasurer on the Task Force.  

          The California Professional Firefighters, California Labor 
          Federation, California School Employees Association, SEIU 
          California, and other labor groups believe that this bill 
          will serve as an important tool for the state in its 
          efforts to examine how best to fund needed services in 
          these tight budget times.  For example, the California 
          State Employees Association writes that "We applaud your 
          effort to explore the feasibility of a state bank that can 
          help individuals and our small businesses to get credit or 
          to start a new venture that private banks may be against 
          due to the current economic downturn.  A state bank could 
          strengthen economic and community development, provide 
          financial stability to individuals and businesses, reduce 
          the cost paid by state government for banking services, and 
          provide for excess earning to be used to supplement General 
          Fund purposes." 

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The California Bankers 
          Association (CBA) believes that the bill is unnecessary and 
          harmful, and that it fails to direct the task force to 
          study all of the operational challenges and risks 
          associated with operating a bank.  

          Among CBA's arguments:  (1) This bill directs the Task 
          Force to study the viability of a state bureaucracy to 
          offer retail banking products.  This could lead to the 
          state issuing checking and savings accounts, mortgage and 
          auto loans, credit cards, and other lines of credit, which 
          could, in turn, require the General Fund to cover 
          inevitable credit losses.  (2) This bill ignores safety and 
          soundness policies, regulatory compliance, and 
          examinations.  It does not address which Federal Reserve 
          regulations and operational standards a state bank would 







                                                                AB 750
                                                                Page 
          8

          have to comply with, does not address who would be 
          responsible for regulating and examining a state bank, and 
          does not address what the potential conflicts of interest 
          would be if a state entity were responsible for examining a 
          state bank.  (3) This bill mistakenly focuses on the costs 
          paid by state government for banking services, yet ignores 
          the General Fund cost savings associated with contracting 
          out for banking services.  The state has partnered with 
          banks to provide services where the state lacks expertise, 
          and where contracting out for banking services can save the 
          state money.  Banks provide cash management services, 
          clearinghouse functions, and short-term lending, issue 
          state credit cards, and help the state sell state-issued 
          bonds.  Banks also save the state money by providing 
          services such as child support delinquency collections, 
          financial institution data match services to aid in the 
          location of delinquent taxpayers, electronic benefit 
          transfer cards, and unemployment and disability insurance 
          debit cards.  Not only would the state risk the loss of 
          financial industry expertise if it created a state bank, 
          but could also incur significant General Fund costs.  (4) 
          Finally, this bill could lead to the creation of a state 
          banking entity that would crowd out commercial banking 
          services.  A state bank has the ability to use the enormous 
          resources of the state to nearly monopolize the market and 
          create an unfair advantage over commercial banks.  The 
          unlevel playing field created by a state bank will result 
          in less competition and a reduction in consumer choice.  


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  50-24, 6/1/11
          AYES:  Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block, 
            Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Butler, Charles 
            Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Davis, 
            Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, 
            Gatto, Gordon, Hall, Hayashi, Roger Hern�ndez, Hill, 
            Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Lara, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, 
            Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Perea, Portantino, 
            Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Wieckowski, Williams, 
            Yamada, John A. P�rez
          NOES:  Bill Berryhill, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, Fletcher, 
            Beth Gaines, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Harkey, Jones, 
            Knight, Logue, Mansoor, Miller, Morrell, Nestande, 
            Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Silva, Smyth, Valadao, Wagner







                                                                AB 750
                                                                Page 
          9

          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Achadjian, Buchanan, Garrick, Gorell, 
            Jeffries, V. Manuel P�rez


          JJA:mw  9/8/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****