BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 765
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 13, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 765 (Achadjian) - As Amended: March 23, 2011
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote: 7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill expands the definition of rape by fraud to include
submission of the victim to sexual intercourse under the belief,
induced by pretense, that the perpetrator is a "cohabitant."
(Current law refers only to a spouse.)
FISCAL EFFECT
Unknown, likely minor if any, annual GF costs for increased
state prison commitments. No one was committed to state prison
in 2009 or 2010 for this offense.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale. The author contends the statute should be updated
to apply to cohabitants as well as spouses.
The author also cites a Santa Barbara case in which a male
entered a residence during the night and had intercourse with
the female occupant. The victim believed the suspect was her
cohabitant boyfriend. Although she was awake during the
encounter, the victim did not immediately realize he was not
her boyfriend. When the victim realized he was not her
boyfriend she resisted and he fled.
Although the perpetrator was arrested, the D.A. could not
prosecute for felony rape, since the victim and her boyfriend
lived together but were not married. The D.A. charged
misdemeanor sexual battery and trespass, and the case was
settled when the defendant pled guilty to these lesser
charges.
AB 765
Page 2
2)Current law states rape by fraud is committed when a person
submits to sexual intercourse under the belief that the person
committing the act is the victim's spouse, and this belief is
induced by any artifice, pretense, or concealment practiced by
the accused, with intent to induce the belief.
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081