BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 787
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 11, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 787 (Chesbro) - As Amended: March 31, 2011
Policy Committee: Water, Parks and
Wildlife Vote: 13-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill requires the Fish and Game Commission to permit
California Native American tribe members to continue fishing and
gathering practices for traditional religious, ceremonial and
cultural purposes.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor, absorbable costs to the Department of Fish and Game (DFG)
and the commission to modify regulations according to this bill.
The commission already has completed or is working to complete
much of the work required by this bill. (Fish and Game
Preservation Fund.)
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author contends this bill will legally affirm
the commission's authority to allow tribe members to fish and
gather in Marine Protection Areas.
2)Background . The Marine Life Protection Act, enacted in 1999,
calls for the redesign and establishment of a network of
Marine Protection Areas to protect and conserve marine life,
habitat and ecosystems. There are several types of MPAs,
including marine life reserves in which no fishing or other
extractive activities are allowed, and other MPAs in which
certain types of commercial and recreational harvesting
activities are allowed.
The act charges the commission with administering the program
and designing the network of MPAs. The commission is working
AB 787
Page 2
to adopt five regional MPAs collectively covering the entire
state. In developing the MPA for the North Coast region, the
commission considered a stakeholder proposal, known as the
Unified Proposal, which, among other things, included a
statement of intent to allow for traditional, non-commercial,
subsistence, ceremonial, cultural and stewardship uses by
tribal people to continue in marine protected areas.
The commission recently directed staff to develop a revised
North Coast MPA consistent with the Unified Proposal and
allowing continued tribal uses. However, attorneys at the
Natural Resources Agency are not certain the commission has
the legal authority to permit these activities in an MPA.
3)There is no registered support or opposition to this bill.
Analysis Prepared by : Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081