BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 795
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 5, 2011

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION
                                 Marty Block, Chair
                     AB 795 (Block) - As Amended:  April 28, 2011
           
          SUBJECT  :   Public postsecondary education: smoke-free campuses.

           SUMMARY  :   Authorizes the California Community Colleges (CCC), 
          California State University (CSU), and University of California 
          (UC) governing bodies to set enforcement standards for their 
          local campus tobacco use policies, as follows:

          1)Authorizes CCC, CSU and UC governing bodies to impose a fine 
            for a first, second, and third offense and for each subsequent 
            offence. 

          2)Provides that the amount of fines is to be determined by the 
            local governing body, not to exceed $100.  Provides that funds 
            shall be allocated to include, but not be limited to, the 
            designated enforcement agency, education and promotion of the 
            policy, and tobacco cessation treatment options. 

          3)Requires, if a campus adopts the enforcement and fine 
            measures, signs to be posted stating campus tobacco use 
            policies, including the locations at which tobacco use is 
            prohibited and permitted. 

          4)Requires, if a campus adopts the enforcement and fine measure, 
            employees and students to be informed of the tobacco use 
            policy and enforcement measures employed on their campus.

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)Prohibits smoking inside public buildings or in outdoor areas 
            within 20 feet of a main exit, entrance or window of a public 
            building, but establishes that the aforementioned provision 
            does not preempt local entities and CCC, CSU and UC from 
            adopting and enforcing more restrictive smoking and tobacco 
            control policies (Government Code �7597).

          2)Authorizes a person to smoke in any other outdoor area of a 
            public building unless otherwise prohibited by state law or 
            local ordinance, and a sign describing the prohibition is 
            posted (Government Code �7598).








                                                                  AB 795
                                                                  Page  2


          3)Prohibits smoking and the disposal of smoking related waste 
            within 25 feet of any playground or sandbox area.  Provides 
            that a violation is an infraction punishable by a $250 fine 
            for each incident (Health and Safety Code 104495).

          4)Prohibits an employer from knowingly permitting smoking in an 
            enclosed space of employment, including lobbies, lounges, 
            waiting areas, elevators, stairwells and restrooms that are a 
            structural part of the building (Labor Code �6404.5).

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.  

           COMMENTS  :   Purpose of this bill  :  The author notes that every 
          day students, faculty and guests at California's public colleges 
          and universities unwillingly breathe secondhand smoke on 
          campuses that endangers their health. The Center for Disease 
          Control named smoking as the leading cause of preventable death, 
          disease, and disability in the United States.  While existing 
          law authorizes colleges and universities to adopt and enforce 
          smoking and tobacco control policies, it is not specific on the 
          type of enforcement.  Many colleges have indicated that they are 
          hesitant to adopt stronger policies because they are concerned 
          that they have no way of enforcing the current ones.  By adding 
          specific enforcement policies to current law, colleges will have 
          clear authority to "cite and collect revenue" as a form of 
          enforcement. 

           Background  :  Existing law does not preclude UC, CSU and CCC from 
          adopting and enforcing smoking policies stronger than state law. 
           According to the author, anti-smoking advocates working with 
          public colleges and universities have been told repeatedly by 
          campuses that campus police cannot enforce anti-smoking policies 
          against violators under existing law because the law does not 
          contain specific language authorizing public institutions the 
          authority to cite violators.  While a cursory examination of UC, 
          CSU, and CCC campuses found that most campuses have anti-smoking 
          policies, few campuses have clear enforcement mechanisms.  
          Committee staff was able to locate one smoking policy with a 
          clear enforcement mechanism: 

           Existing law provides the CSU Board of Trustees broad 
            authority to establish rules and regulations governing campus 
            grounds (Education Code �89031).  The CSU Trustees have 
            delegated authority to regulate local campus smoking policies 








                                                                  AB 795
                                                                  Page  3

            to campus presidents (California Code of Regulations �42356).  
              Citing this authority, San Francisco State University 
            President Robert Corrigan directed the University Police 
            Department to begin issuing citations for violations of the 
            campus smoke-free policy on April 12, 2010.  The fine for each 
            violation is $58.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Allan Hancock College Student Health Services
          American Heart Association
          American Lung Association
          Chabot Student Health Center, Chabot College
          College of the Canyons, Student Health and Wellness Center
          Cosumnes River College Health Services
          Cuesta College Health Services
          Foothill College
          Fullerton College Health Services
          Gavilan College Student Health Services
          Health Services Association of California Community Colleges
          Moreno Valley College Health Services
          Mission College
          Mission College CalWORKs
          Santa Rosa Junior College
          San Diego Miramar College Student Health Services
          Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District
          Student Senate for California Community Colleges
          14 Individuals

           Opposition 
           
          None on File
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916) 
          319-3960