BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 808|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 808
          Author:   Skinner (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/6/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE LABOR & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMM.  :  5-0, 6/27/12
          AYES:  Lieu, DeSaulnier, Leno, Padilla, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wyland, Runner

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 8/16/12
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Lieu, Price, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Dutton

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 75-0, 5/26/11 (Consent) - See last page for 
            vote


           SUBJECT  :    Workers compensation:  hospital employers:  
          presumption

           SOURCE :     California Nurses Association


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides, with respect to hospital 
          employees who provide direct patient care in an acute care 
          hospital, that the term injury" includes 
          methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA skin 
          infection) that develops or manifests itself during the 
          period of the person's employment with the hospital.  This 
          bill creates a presumption that MRSA skin infection arises 
          out of and in the course of the person's employment if MRSA 
          skin infection develops or manifests as specified.  This 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 808
                                                                Page 
          2

          bill prohibits attributing MRSA skin infection that 
          develops or manifests in those cases to any disease or skin 
          infection existing prior to that development or 
          manifestation.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law establishes a workers' 
          compensation system that provides benefits to an employee 
          who suffers from an injury or illness that arises out of 
          and in the course of employment, irrespective of fault.  
          This system requires all employers to secure payment of 
          benefits by either securing the consent of the Department 
          of Industrial Relations to self-insure or by securing 
          insurance against liability from an insurance company duly 
          authorized by the state.

          Existing law creates a series of disputable presumptions of 
          an occupational injury for peace and safety officers for 
          the purposes of the workers' compensation system.  These 
          presumptions include:

           Heart disease;
           Hernias;
           Pneumonia;
           Cancer;
           Meningitis;
           Tuberculosis;
           MRSA skin infection; and
           Bloodborne infectious disease.

          The compensation awarded for these injuries must include 
          full hospital, surgical, medical treatment, disability 
          indemnity, and death benefits, as provided by workers 
          compensation law.  These presumptions tend to run for 5 to 
          10 years commencing on their last day of employment, 
          depending on the injury and the peace officer 
          classification involved. 

          Existing law provides that the presumptions listed above 
          are disputable and may be controverted by evidence.  
          However, unless controverted, the Workers' Compensation 
          Appeals Board must find is accordance with the presumption. 


          This bill provides, with respect to hospital employees who 







                                                                AB 808
                                                                Page 
          3

          provide direct patient care in an acute care hospital, that 
          the term "injury" includes MRSA skin infection that 
          develops or manifests itself during the period of the 
          person's employment with the hospital.  This bill creates a 
          presumption that MRSA skin infection arises out of and in 
          the course of the person's employment if MRSA skin 
          infection develops or manifests as specified.  This bill 
          prohibits attributing MRSA skin infection that develops or 
          manifests in those cases to any disease or skin infection 
          existing prior to that development or manifestation.

           Comments
           
           Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus  .  
          Staphylococcus aureus, often referred to simply as "staph," 
          are bacteria commonly carried on the skin or in the nose of 
          healthy people. Approximately 25% to 30% of the population 
          is colonized (when bacteria are present, but not causing an 
          infection) in the nose with staph bacteria.  Staph bacteria 
          are one of the most common causes of skin infections in the 
          United States. Most of these skin infections are minor and 
          occur through direct physical contact of the staphylococci 
          with a break in the skin (cut or scrape).  The staph can be 
          spread by the infected person to someone else or to an 
          object.  Susceptibility to infection depends on factors 
          such as immunity and general state of health. 

          In the past, these staph infections typically have been 
          easy to treat with an inexpensive, short course, usually 
          well-tolerated antibiotics. Now, in most communities in the 
          U.S., over half of the staph causing skin infections are 
          resistant to commonly used antibiotics, and the infections 
          often return in spite of apparently successful initial 
          treatment.

          MRSA is Staphylococcus aureus that is resistant to the 
          penicillin.  Originally, MRSA was confined to hospitals and 
          long-term care facilities.  Many of these 
          hospital-associated MRSA infections caused very serious 
          complications and were resistant to all oral antibiotics. 

          More recently, a newer, more virulent strain of MRSA has 
          emerged in the community that causes boils, abscesses, and 
          other soft tissue infections that are not linked to 







                                                                AB 808
                                                                Page 
          4

          previous antibiotic use. It is called community-associated 
          MRSA.  It is generally believed that the 
          community-associated MRSA strains did not originate from 
          the strains of MRSA that cause infections in hospitals and 
          other healthcare facilities.  However, individuals seeking 
          treatment for community-associated MRSA would likely seek 
          treatment in a hospital due to the risks involved.

          Individuals at risk for MRSA include workers in a 
          healthcare setting, individuals visiting patients in a 
          healthcare setting, athletic facilities, dormitories, 
          military barracks, correctional facilities, and daycare 
          centers.  However, MRSA is now found throughout the general 
          community.

           Prior Legislation
           
          AB 375 (Skinner, 2011) contained nearly identical 
          provisions to this bill on Methicillin-Resistant 
          Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin infections, but also 
          included bloodborne pathogens.  The bill was refused 
          passage on the Senate Floor. 

          AB 1994 (Skinner, 2010) proposed similar provisions to AB 
          375, but also included additional conditions to which the 
          presumption would apply, such as back and neck injuries.  
          The bill was held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee 
          Suspense File.

          AB 664 (Skinner, 2009) was similar to AB 1994.  AB 664 was 
          held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee Suspense 
          File.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           Minimum $33,000 to $65,000 for industrial disability 
            benefit (up to one year), up to $53,000 for additional 
            temporary disability benefit (up to one additional year).

           Potentially major benefit and medical costs if a MSRA 
            injury results in permanent disability.







                                                                AB 808
                                                                Page 
          5


           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/16/12)

          California Nurses Association (source) 
          California Applicants' Attorneys Association
          California Labor Federation
          California Professional Firefighters
          Laborers' Locals 777 & 792
          Union of Healthcare Professionals
          United Nurses Association of California

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/16/12)

          ALPHA Fund
          Association of California Healthcare Districts
          Association of California Insurance Companies
          California Association for Health Services at Home
          California Association of Joint Powers Authorities
          California Chamber of Commerce 
          California Coalition of Workers' Compensation
          California Hospital Association
          California Special Districts Association
          California State Association of Counties
          CSAC Excess Insurance Authority
          Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
          Regional Council of Rural Counties

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Proponents believe that this bill 
          will ensure that nurses are appropriately protected from 
          the pathogenic hazards found in hospitals.  Proponents note 
          that current law provides a presumption of occupational 
          injury to public safety officers if they contract a 
          Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin 
          infection, but nurses who are exposed to MRSA on a routine 
          basis are not provided a similar presumption.  Proponents 
          note that while existing procedures have done much to 
          reduce MRSA exposures, it remains a daily threat to the 
          health of nurses throughout California.  Finally, 
          proponents note that nurses perform a highly specialized 
          and key role in ensuring the health and welfare of the 
          people of California, and they should be able to provide 
          that service without fighting with an insurance company in 
          the event of a serious MRSA infection.








                                                                AB 808
                                                                Page 
          6

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    Opponents argue that there is 
          no rationale to extend the concept of presumptions to 
          employees who are not in the traditional group - public 
          safety officers - who have received this special benefit 
          due to the special dangers of the work they do.  Because of 
          the unique role that public safety officers play in our 
          society, they have historically received several different 
          and unique benefits, including enhanced retirement rules, 
          special disability retirement rules, enhanced temporary 
          disability rules, and presumptions of compensability.  
          While these enhanced benefits may be appropriate for public 
          safety employees, it does not follow that these rules 
          should be expanded to other classes of employee.  Opponents 
          argue that there is no evidence that the normal rules 
          governing how injuries or conditions are proven to be 
          job-related are not working properly with respect to the 
          employees and the conditions being addressed by the bill.  


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 75-0, 05/26/11
          AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Bill 
            Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Carter, 
            Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eng, Feuer, 
            Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Beth Gaines, Galgiani, 
            Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Hall, 
            Harkey, Hayashi, Roger Hern�ndez, Hill, Huber, Hueso, 
            Huffman, Jeffries, Knight, Lara, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, 
            Ma, Mansoor, Mendoza, Miller, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, 
            Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel 
            P�rez, Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, 
            Swanson, Torres, Valadao, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, 
            Yamada, John A. P�rez
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Campos, Cedillo, Davis, Gorell, Jones


          PQ:n  8/20/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****










                                                                AB 808
                                                                Page 
          7