BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 817
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 27, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 817 (Gatto) - As Amended: May 12, 2011
Policy Committee:
JudiciaryVote:10-0 (Consent)
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires the California Law Revision Commission (CLRC)
to study whether the laws regulating vehicle rental companies
and their customers should be made more clear and concise, and
report its findings to the Legislature by December 31, 2012.
FISCAL EFFECT
Absorbable costs to the CLRC, which would likely have to alter
its planned work schedule to some extent in order to meet the
deadline for this study and report.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . According to the author, existing statutes regarding
car rental companies would benefit by reorganization and
revision. Civil Code Section 1936, relating to rental car
transactions, was first enacted in 1988, and has since been
amended numerous times, sections 1936.01, 1936.015, 1936.05
and 1936.1 have all been enacted, including many provisions
that are redundant to section 1936. The author contends that
the result is a set of laws that is confusingly organized and
unnecessarily long. This has led to a lack of clarity for
rental car companies and their customers when faced with a
question that pertains to these code sections. Rental company
personnel who are involved in company operations continually
seek legal interpretations of the meanings of current law.
2)The CLRC was created in 1953 and was given the responsibility
to substantively review California's statutory and case law.
AB 817
Page 2
The commission seeks to discover deficiencies in existing law
and makes related recommendations to the Legislature for
needed reforms. The commission is currently authorized, by
legislative resolution, to study 22 specific topics.
3)The May Revision of the governor's proposed budget eliminates
the CLRC .
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081