BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 850
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 18, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 850 (Gordon) - As Amended: April 14, 2011
Policy Committee: Natural
ResourcesVote:9-0
Business, Professions and Consumer Protection9-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill reverses the roles played by the California Energy
Commission (CEC) and the Department of General Services (DGS) in
developing the state's multiyear plan to encourage energy
efficiency in state facilities. Specifically, the bill places
the CEC in charge of developing the plan and requires it to do
so in consultation with DGS. The bill also adds water
conservation to the plan's goals and requires CEC to solicit
input from both public and private entities.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Unknown though likely minor costs, no more than $200,000, to
CEC to take over the lead roll in developing the energy
efficiency and water conservation plan for state facilities.
(Energy Resources Programs Account (ERPA).)
2)Ongoing annual costs to CEC in the ten thousands of dollars,
to lead development and update of plan. (ERPA.)
3)Likely savings to DGS of an amount similar to the costs
realized by CEC. (Special fund.)
COMMENTS
1)Rationale. The author contends it appropriate to have state
government's experts on energy efficiency in charge of the
state's plan to encourage energy efficiency in state
buildings. The author also contends water conservation in
state buildings should be included in the energy efficiency
AB 850
Page 2
plan.
1)Background. Current law requires DGS, in consultation with
the CEC, to develop a multi-year plan, to be updated
biennially, to exploit all practicable and cost-effective
energy efficiency measures in state facilities.
1)Support. This bill is supported by East Bay Municipal Utility
District.
2)Opposition. There is no formal opposition registered to this
bill.
Analysis Prepared by : Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081