BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 906
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 4, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 906 (Galgiani) - As Amended: April 6, 2011
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:9-0
(Consent)
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill expands eligibility to participate in the state's Safe
at Home address confidentiality program, administered by the
Secretary of State (SOS), to include any witness who has
testified in a murder trial.
FISCAL EFFECT
It is unknown how many witnesses would choose to participate in
the Safe at Home program. According to the SOS, the annual GF
cost of the program, currently with 2,735 participants, is
$1.041 million, or an average cost of $381 per participant. At
this cost, if the program were to grow by only 400 new
participants, the total cost would exceed $150,000. Regardless
of the number of participants, the SOS would likely require two
staff positions, at a cost of $150,000 to establish this new
category of program participant.
COMMENTS
1)Background and Purpose . The Safe at Home program, originally
established by SB 489 (Alpert)/Chapter 1005 of 1998 and
expanded and extended several times thereafter, allows victims
of domestic violence, stalking victims, as well as
reproductive health care services providers and their
employees, volunteers, and patients, to apply to the SOS for
an alternate address to be used in public records. The
program is intended to enable state and local agencies to
respond to requests for public records without disclosing the
names or locations of program participants. This bill seeks to
protect the confidentiality of addresses of witnesses who have
AB 906
Page 2
testified in a murder trial by bringing such individuals
within the protective umbrella of the Safe at Home program.
Supporters contend that such witnesses are often
understandably fearful that those they testify against may
acquire access to their home address and exact revenge.
The author of the bill notes that, "it makes sense that
witnesses who testified in murder trials should also be
allowed to keep their actual physical location confidential in
the hopes of relieving their fears of retribution for their
testimony."
2)Prior Legislation . SB 1233 (Oropeza)/Chapter 326 of 2010
removed the sunset date on the Safe at Home program.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081