BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 938
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 18, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                 AB 938 (V. Manuel Perez) - As Amended:  May 4, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Environmental 
          Safety and Toxic Materials                    Vote: 6-3

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill makes requirements of notices of noncompliance with 
          drinking water standards issued by public water systems.  
          Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Requires such a notice to:

             a)   As of July 1, 2012, be in English, Spanish and the 
               language spoken by any non-English-speaking group that 
               exceeds 10% of persons served by the public water system.

             b)   Include a telephone number or address by which residents 
               may contact the system.

             c)   For each group that speaks a language other than English 
               or Spanish and that exceeds either 1,000 residents or 10% 
               of the persons served by the water system, include 
               information regarding the importance of the notice and a 
               telephone number or address where the water system will 
               provide either a translated copy of the notice or 
               assistance in the appropriate language.

          2)Presumes that the notice has been properly given if the water 
            system has utilized data from the American Community Survey of 
            the United States Census Bureau and the county registrar.

          3)Adds environmental documentation to the list of costs to be 
            considered when determining affordability using Department of 
            Public Health (DPH) criteria for Safe Drinking Water State 
            Revolving Fund funding.









                                                                  AB 938
                                                                  Page  2

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Absorbable costs to DPH to review notifications and 
            implementation.

          2)Unknown costs to public water systems, which can be public or 
            private entities, to provide notice as required by this bill.

          COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  The author notes that existing regulations allow a 
            public water system to provide notice of noncompliance only in 
            English if the water system includes in the notice a telephone 
            number or address where the non-English-speaking residents may 
            obtain a translated copy of the notice. The author asserts 
            that public health is threatened when those receiving service 
            from a public water system cannot understand notices of 
            noncompliance sent by the water system.

           2)Background.   Public water systems, which can be either 
            publicly or privately owned, are those systems that regularly 
            supply drinking water to at least 25 people or 15 service 
            connections. In California, there are over 7,000 public water 
            systems, each of which is regulated and permitted by DPH. 
            These systems include both groundwater systems and surface 
            water systems and supply drinking water to the majority of 
            Californians.
           
             Existing law requires DPH to permit a public water system that 
            demonstrates it can provide a reliable and adequate supply of 
            water at all times that is pure, wholesome, potable, and does 
            not endanger the health of consumers.  A public water system 
            must notify users of contaminants found in water supplies, of 
            certain failures in water quality and water quality 
            monitoring, and of other imminent dangers to public health.  

           3)Support  .  This bill is supported by long list of social 
            justice, environmental groups and others who advocate for 
            access to clean water and for civil rights.

           4)Opposition  .  The bill is opposed by the Association of 
            California Water Agencies (ACWA), the California Municipal 
            Utilities Association and other water associations and 
            providers who argue the notification requirements in the bill 
            will significantly increase public water system costs and 








                                                                  AB 938
                                                                  Page  3

            delay notification of noncompliance with water violations.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081