BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 983
                                                                  Page 1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 983 (Perea)
          As Amended  September 8, 2011
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |78-0 |(June 1, 2011)  |SENATE: |37-0 |(September 9,  |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2011)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    E.S. & T.M.  

           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the Department of Public Health (DPH) to 
          take specified actions, when implementing the Safe Drinking 
          Water State Revolving Fund (SDWSRF), to improve access to 
          financial assistance for projects serving small community water 
          systems and disadvantaged communities.  

           The Senate amendments:  

          1)Define  "acceptable result" as a project that, when 
            constructed, solves the drinking water problem for which the 
            project was placed on the project funding priority list, 
            ensures the owner and operator of the improved or restructured 
            public water system shall have long-term technical, 
            managerial, and financial capacity to operate and maintain the 
            public water system in compliance with state and federal safe 
            drinking water standards, can provide a dependable source of 
            safe drinking water long-term, and is both short-term and 
            long-term affordable, as determined by applicable regulations 
            adopted by the department. 


          2)Delete provisions that would have given DPH the authority to 
            agree to extend the term of a loan from the SDWSRF beyond 20 
            years for disadvantaged communities.

          3)Delete provisions that would have required DPH to prioritize, 
            for funding from the SDWSRF, projects that include 
            consolidation with a small water system without regard to the 
            project proponent.


          4)Double joint this bill with Assembly Bill 938 (V. Manuel 
            P�rez), to avoid chaptering out conflicts.








                                                                  AB 983
                                                                  Page 2


          5)Make technical and clarifying changes.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill authorized DPH to take 
          specified actions, when implementing the SDWSRF, to improve 
          access to financial assistance for projects serving small water 
          systems and disadvantaged communities.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, enactment of this bill could result in cost pressure 
          to DPH of an unknown amount, but potentially in the millions of 
          dollars, to fund up to 100%, rather than up to 80%, of project 
          costs for small water systems serving severely disadvantaged 
          communities (SDWSRF); and, a potential delay in loan repayment 
          by disadvantaged communities, consistent with this bill 
          (SDWSRF).




           COMMENTS  :  

          Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (SDWSRF)  :  The SDWSRF, 
          which was established in the federal 1996 Safe Drinking Water 
          Act Amendments, provides financial assistance in the form of 
          capitalization grants to states to provide low interest loans 
          and other assistance to public water systems.  In order to 
          receive these funds, states must provide a state match equal to 
          20% of the federal capitalization grants and must create a 
          drinking water state revolving fund program for public water 
          system infrastructure needs and other drinking water-related 
          activities.  In response, California established the state 
          SDWSRF, which is administered by DPH.

           Expedited payment process for loans to disadvantaged 
          communities  :  Proponents of the bill argue that because of the 
          significance of water quality projects to the public health, 
          small communities need loans to be disbursed without delay for 
          water quality project improvements.  The Legislature passed, and 
          the Governor signed, AB 2356 (Arambula), Chapter 609, Statutes 
          of 2008, which requires the State Water Resources Control Board 
          (SWRCB) to establish a payment process by which the recipient of 
          financial assistance for water quality projects receives funds 
          within 30 days of the date on which the SWRCB receives a project 
          payment request.  This bill authorizes DPH, when implementing 








                                                                  AB 983
                                                                  Page 3

          the SDWSRF, to establish a similar expedited payment process.

           Loans for severely disadvantaged communitie  s:  Proponents of the 
          bill argue that severely disadvantaged communities are often 
          unable to take advantage of existing funds for drinking water 
          projects because they are unable to repay even modest loans.  
          Last year the Legislature passed, and the Governor signed, AB 
          2515 (V. Manuel P�rez), Chapter 601, Statutes of 2010, which 
          authorizes DPH to provide a grant from the SDWSRF for 
          point-of-entry and point-of-use water treatment systems if that 
          system serves a severely disadvantaged community.  Similarly, 
          this bill makes small community water systems or nontransient 
          noncommunity water systems owned by a public agency or private 
          not-for-profit water company serving severely disadvantaged 
          communities eligible to receive up to 100% of their eligible 
          project costs in the form of a grant, to the extent that the 
          system cannot afford a loan, from the SDWSRF.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Shannon McKinney / E.S. & T.M. / (916) 
          319-3965                                          

                                                                 FN: 
                                                                 0002856