BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1027
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1027 (Buchanan)
          As Amended  June 1, 2011
          Majority vote  

           UTILITIES & COMMERCE              13-0              LOCAL 
          GOVERNMENT          9-0         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Bradford, Fletcher,       |Ayes:|Smyth, Alejo, Bradford,   |
          |     |Buchanan, Fong, Fuentes,  |     |Campos, Davis, Gordon,    |
          |     |Carter, Roger Hern�ndez,  |     |Hueso, Knight, Norby      |
          |     |Huffman, Knight, Ma,      |     |                          |
          |     |Nestande, Skinner,        |     |                          |
          |     |Swanson                   |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          APPROPRIATIONS      17-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |     |                          |
          |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |     |                          |
          |     |Davis, Donnelly, Gatto,   |     |                          |
          |     |Hall, Hill, Lara,         |     |                          |
          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Smyth, |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires local publicly owned electric utilities 
          (POUs), including irrigation districts (IDs), to make 
          appropriate space and capacity on and in their utility poles and 
          support structures available for use by cable television 
          corporations, video service providers, and telephone 
          corporations.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Requires local POUs and IDs to make appropriate space and 
            capacity on and in a utility pole and support structure owned 
            or controlled by the local publicly owned electric utility 
            available for use by a cable television corporation, video 
            service provider, or telephone corporation.  

          2)Stipulates that the annual fee charged by a POU for the use of 
            a utility pole shall not exceed an amount determined by 








                                                                  AB 1027
                                                                  Page  2


            multiplying the percentage of the total usable space occupied 
            by the pole attachment by the annual costs of ownership of the 
            pole and its supporting anchor.

          3)Stipulates that the annual fee charged by a POU for use of a 
            support structure shall not exceed the POUs annual costs of 
            ownership, as defined, of the percentage of the volume of the 
            capacity of the structure rendered unusable by the 
            telecommunications provider's equipment.

          4)Requires the POU board to ensure that neither its customers 
            nor the telecommunications providers' customers are subsidized 
            by implementation of this bill's provisions.

          5)States that the requesting party shall have the responsibility 
            to coordinate with third-party existing attachers for 
            make-ready work to be completed.

          6)Specifies that all parties shall complete all make-ready work 
            within 60 days of the notice, or within 105 days in the case 
            of a request to attach to over 300 poles.

          7)Allows a local publicly owned electric utility to consider the 
            impact of an approved project for future use by the local 
            publicly owned electric utility of its utility poles or 
            support structures for delivery of its core utility service 
            when denying a pole attachment request.

          8)Allows a local publicly owned electric utility to assess a 
            one-time fee to process a request for attachment, if the 
            one-time fee does not exceed the actual cost of processing the 
            request.

          9)States that if it becomes necessary for the local publicly 
            owned electric utility to use space or capacity on or in a 
            support structure occupied by the cable television 
            corporation, video service provider, or telephone 
            corporation's equipment, the cable corporation, video service 
            provider, or telephone corporation shall either pay all the 
            costs for rearrangements necessary to maintain the pole 
            attachment or remove its equipment at its own expense.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to Assembly Appropriations Committee, 
          negligible state fiscal impact.  Any costs of this bill would be 








                                                                  AB 1027
                                                                  Page  3


          borne by POUs and telecommunications provider customers.  POUs 
          are able to recover their costs through rates charged to their 
          utility customers.

           COMMENTS  :
             
          Background  .  In 1978, to ensure that telephone companies and 
          electric utilities would not stifle the growth of the 
          then-fledgling cable television industry by charging excessive 
          rates for essential pole attachments, Congress enacted the Pole 
          Attachment Act 1978 (Act).  The Act did not require utilities to 
          give cable operators access to their facilities but merely 
          limited the rates they could charge if they chose to give such 
          access.  Municipal utilities' and co-ops' pole attachments are 
          not subject to Federal Communication Commission's (FCC's) 
          jurisdiction because they are exempt from the federal Act.  On 
          April 7, 2011, FCC reformed its pole attachment rules for 
          regulated utilities to "streamline access and reduce costs for 
          attaching broadband lines and wireless antennas to utility 
          poles.

          Issue.  POUs currently have the sole discretion over the rates 
          they charge communications providers for pole attachments.  This 
          bill creates a process for POUs to determine pole attachment 
          rates by multiplying the percentage of the total usable space 
          which is occupied by the pole attachment by the annual costs of 
          ownership of the pole and its supporting anchor.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    DaVina Flemings / U. & C. / (916) 
          319-2083 


                                                                FN: 0001193