BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1059
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 4, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                AB 1059 (Huffman) - As Introduced:  February 18, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              HealthVote:11-4

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the California Department of Managed Health 
          Care (DMHC) to use specific administrative enforcement 
          mechanisms when a health plan violates specified provisions of 
          the Knox-Keene Act. Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Requires the director of DMHC to do both of the following 
            after a determination of an unfair payment pattern by a health 
            plan against providers: 

             a)   Assess an administrative penalty of not less than the 
               amount owed to the provider, plus interest, deposited into 
               a special fund created by the bill.

             b)   Require health plans to make payment owed to the 
               provider, plus interest.

          2)Authorizes the director to provide an exemption to these 
            administrative penalty provisions if the payment of such 
            amounts would create risk of health plan fiscal insolvency. 

          3)Specifies that providers recovering reimbursement under this 
            bill not be required to resubmit claims except under 
            extraordinary circumstances.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Potential for increased staffing costs to DMHC, estimated in 
            the range of $1-2 million to review and assess provider 
            complaints, and for increased enforcement to ensure that 
            penalties are assessed and providers are paid according to the 
            provisions of this bill.  








                                                                  AB 1059
                                                                  Page  2


          2)Unknown increased revenues to the Managed Care Administrative 
            Fines and Penalties Fund from increased penalties levied 
            against health plans, likely in the range of $500,000 to tens 
            of millions of dollars annually. 
           
          3)Staffing costs and penalty revenue estimates are highly 
            uncertain, due to unknown plan and provider behavior in 
            response to the bill's provisions. To the extent health plans 
            respond to this bill by adjusting their claims payment 
            practices to avoid provider complaints and increased 
            penalties, associated staffing costs and revenues would 
            decrease.  If providers respond to this bill by increasing 
            complaint reports due to the increased likelihood of 
            reimbursement, staffing costs and revenues would increase. 
            Additionally, the increase in penalty revenues due to this 
            bill would depend on DMHC's determinations of unfair payment 
            patterns and on penalties levied under current law.

           COMMENTS  


           1)Rationale  .  According to the author, this bill ensures that 
            enforcement actions by the DMHC are adequate to deter health 
            plans from underpaying physicians.  Currently, DMHC has 
            discretion to assess penalties on health plans for unfair 
            payment practices, but the author contends that the DMHC has 
            consistently failed to take adequate enforcement action 
            against plans that violate the law.

           2)Related Legislation  . AB 1155 (Huffman) in 2007 was nearly 
            identical to this bill and was vetoed.  The veto message 
            indicated that current law already provides DMHC with adequate 
            authority to assess penalties, that the department has taken a 
            number of actions to resolve payment disputes, and that 
            physicians should make use of the internal dispute resolution 
            process.  


            AB 1455 (Chapter 827, Statutes of 2000) established new 
            requirements for prompt payment of provider claims by health 
            plans, defined and prohibited unfair payment practices,  and 
            permitted DMHC to impose monetary penalties when unfair 
            payment practices are identified. DMHC adopted regulations 
            pursuant to this chapter requiring health plans to maintain an 








                                                                  AB 1059
                                                                  Page  3

            internal dispute resolution process. 


            SB 1379 (Ducheny), Chapter 607, Statutes of 2008 created the 
            Managed Care Administrative Fines and Penalties Fund to 
            deposit revenues from fines and penalties levied against 
            health plans. It also redirected the first million dollars 
            deposited into the fund annually to the Steven M. Thompson 
            Physician Corps Loan Repayment Program, and any revenues 
            greater than $1 million to the Major Risk Medical Insurance 
            Program to fund health care for individuals denied coverage in 
            the individual market.  





           Analysis Prepared by  :    Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081