BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1062|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1062
          Author:   Dickinson (D)
          Amended:  8/24/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
          PRIOR VOTES NOT RELEVANT


           SUBJECT  :    Public social services

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill changes the evidentiary standard of 
          proof for elder and dependent abuse or neglect cases from 
          clear and convincing to preponderance of the evidence.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/24/12 delete the prior version 
          of the bill relating to arbitration, and instead change the 
          evidentiary standard of proof for elder and dependent abuse 
          or neglect cases from clear and convincing to preponderance 
          of the evidence.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Provides for the award of attorney's fees and costs to, 
             and the recovery of damages by, a plaintiff, when it is 
             proven by clear and convincing evidence that a defendant 
             is liable for physical abuse or neglect of an elder or 
             dependent adult and the defendant has also been guilty 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1062
                                                                Page 
          2

             of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice in the 
             commission of the abuse.

          2. Authorizes a plaintiff to recover damages for the sake 
             of example and by way of punishing the defendant in 
             addition to the actual damages. 

          3. Provides that an employer is not liable for punitive 
             damages based on the acts of an employee unless certain 
             conditions are satisfied. 

          4. Requires that these conditions regarding the imposition 
             of punitive damages on an employer based upon the acts 
             of an employee be satisfied before any damages or 
             attorney's fees permitted due to liability for physical 
             abuse or neglect of an elder or dependent adult are 
             authorized to be imposed against an employer.

          This bill changes the evidentiary standard of proof for 
          elder and dependent abuse or neglect cases from clear and 
          convincing to preponderance of the evidence.

          This bill also clarifies that punitive damages may not be 
          imposed against an employer unless the requirements for 
          other civil case exemplary damages against employers are 
          satisfied; this requirement would not apply to the recovery 
          of compensatory damages or attorney's fees and costs.  The 
          bill also clarifies that the bill is not intended to affect 
          the standard of proof for punitive damages, as specified.  

          The August 24, 2012 amendments are the same as the 
          provisions contained in SB 558 (Simitian), which was heard 
          in and approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee.  SB 558 
          is held in the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   
          Local:  No


          CTW:m  8/27/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****







                                                               AB 1062
                                                                Page 
          3