BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                     SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE
                            Senator Lois Wolk, Chair
          

          BILL NO:  AB 1090                     HEARING:  7/6/11
          AUTHOR:  Blumenfield                  FISCAL:  No
          VERSION:  5/31/2011                   TAX LEVY:  No
          CONSULTANT:  Grinnell                 

                             PROPERTY TAX DEFERMENT
          

           Enacts the County Deferred Property Tax Program for Senior 
                             and Disabled Citizens.


                           Background and Proposed Law  

          I.   Property Tax Assistance Program  .  Current law 
          establishes the Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens 
          Property Tax Postponement Law (PTP), which allows the 
          Controller to pay property taxes to county tax collectors 
          on behalf of individuals over the age of 62 or disabled 
          persons making less than $39,000 in income per year.  The 
          claimant must repay the Controller upon sale of the home, 
          who secures the loan by recording a lien.  Loans do not 
          become due and payable if the claimant or the claimant's 
          spouse continues to occupy the home secured by the lien.  
          The Controller's lien for a property tax postponement loan 
          is not afforded "super priority" status, similar to liens 
          recorded by county treasurer tax collectors for unpaid 
          property taxes, which means that the county lien is paid 
          before all others if the secured property is sold. PTP is 
          distinct from the Senior Citizens Property Tax Assistance 
          Program (PTAP), administered by the Franchise Tax Board, 
          which is a direct grant program to income-eligible senior 
          citizens.  The state has not funded PTAP since the 2007-08 
          Budget, so the state has not paid claims more recently than 
          those made in 2007.  In 2009, the Legislature also 
          prohibited persons from filing new claims for property tax 
          postponement, and the Controller from accepting 
          applications (SBX3 8, Ducheny, 2009).   

          Assembly Bill 1090 enacts the County Deferred Property Tax 
          Program for Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens.  
          Counties may elect to participate in the program by 
          adopting a resolution indicating the county's intention to 
          participate in the program.  Eligible claimants in 




          AB 1090 - 5/31/11 -- Page 2



          participating counties may apply for deferment on a form 
          created by the participating county, which the county tax 
          collector shall review to ensure that the claimant meets 
          eligibility criteria.  Participating counties must 
          establish a Property Tax Deferral Fund within its Treasury, 
          which shall be used solely to make subvention payments and 
          pay administrative costs.
          County Tax Collectors must defer property taxes on the 
          claimant's residential dwelling due and owing for that 
          fiscal year if the claimant is eligible, timely files an 
          application, and there are sufficient funds in the county's 
          Property Tax Deferral Fund.  If the county tax collector 
          defers the tax, then he or she must issue a subvention 
          payment from the Property Tax Deferral Fund to the County, 
          for processing in the same manner as all other property tax 
          payments.  The payment must then be apportioned as if the 
          taxpayer had paid the tax.  The county sends the taxpayer a 
          letter confirming program participation.  

          The bill prohibits counties from charging penalties or 
          undertaking collections actions on taxpayers granted a 
          deferment.  Counties may defer property taxes retroactively 
          for the time period since the suspension of the PTP law, 
          unless the payment affects a vested right of a private 
          party.

          The measure allows counties to charge a fee when a claimant 
          applies to pay for its administration costs and foreclosure 
          costs when they cannot be collected through collections 
          actions.  Counties may also charge recording fees to pay 
          for the recording and releasing of liens, payable to the 
          County Recorder.  

          The bill further provides definitions for many of its 
          terms, many imported from PTP law.  

          II.   Claims .  The prior PTP law defined "claimants" as 
          persons who:
                 Are 62 years of age or older or blind or disabled 
               on the last day of the calendar year or approved 
               fiscal year. 
                 Own a "residential dwelling," as defined, which 
               requires at least 20% equity of the fair market or 
               assessed valuation. 
                 Has household income of less than $39,000 in the 
               2009 calendar year, as defined.





          AB 1090 - 5/31/11 -- Page 3



          
          Claimants must file postponement applications with the 
          Controller between May 15th and December 10th of the 
          calendar year in which the fiscal year of postponement is 
          requested.  

          Assembly Bill 1090 defines a "claimant" as a person who: 
                 Applies in a participating county. 
                 Has attained eligibility for social security 
               benefits on the last day of the filing period for the 
               fiscal year or is blind or disabled.  For retroactive 
               deferment, then the age of eligibility is 62. 
                 Owns a "residential dwelling," with an updated but 
               functionally identical definition.  To be eligible, 
               the owner must have at least 20% equity of the fair 
               market or assessed valuation as measured by the amount 
               which the fair market value exceeds the total amount 
               of liens.  
                 Has household income of less than $35,500, using 
               the existing definition, but does not allow business 
               losses to reduce household income for eligibility 
               purposes.  

          The bill further states that claimants must file annually, 
          only one claimant per residential dwelling may have 
          property taxes deferred, and the claimant may be required 
          to furnish evidence of eligibility every year to continue 
          participation.  If the claimant fails or refuses to furnish 
          any information, or files a fraudulent claim, then the 
          county obligation is null and void.  The record of a 
          deferred payment on the tax roll shall be canceled, the tax 
          or assessment shall be a lien as though no payment had been 
          made, and the amount of the lien shall be increased by any 
          penalties or interest resulting from the delinquency.  

          AB 1090 requires claimants to file postponement 
          applications with the county tax collector starting October 
          1st and ending December 10th of each year, although 
          counties can grant reasonable extensions for good cause at 
          any time before the end of the fiscal year for which 
          deferment is requested.  Counties may require any 
          information necessary to process the claimant's 
          application, and shall contain a written declaration that 
          the information therein was provided under penalty of 
          perjury.  If a claim is filed timely, any delinquent 
          penalties and interest are cancelled unless the failure to 





          AB 1090 - 5/31/11 -- Page 4



          perfect the claim is due to the claimant or the claimant's 
          agent willful neglect.  In such a case, the subvention 
          payment may be used only if it is accompanied by sufficient 
          amounts to pay the delinquent interest and penalties.  The 
          county shall refund any overpayment to the party entitled 
          thereto.  

          The measure provides that the county shall charge an 
          interest rate the higher of 7% per year or the effective 
          annual yield earned in the prior fiscal year by the Pooled 
          Money Investment Account plus 2%, rounded to the nearest 
          full percent, and imports other parts of existing law 
          regarding interest calculation into the local program 
          applicable to the state program.  The county must disclose 
          the interest rate to the taxpayer.

          III.   Liens  .  Current law allows a county to issue a tax 
          lien against property when an owner is late on paying 
          property taxes, and provides that a judgment is satisfied, 
          and the tax lien removed when the property tax is paid, or 
          the property is sold to satisfy the lien.  Upon sale, tax 
          liens are paid out of proceeds in the order recorded; 
          however, property tax and special assessment liens have 
          priority over all other liens regardless of the time of its 
          creation.

          Assembly Bill 1090 provides that the amounts of property 
          taxes deferred, plus interest accrued, shall be secured by 
          a judgment lien.  The lien shall be evidenced by a notice 
          of lien for deferred property taxes executed by the county, 
          and shall secure all sums deferred and owing, including 
          amounts deferred subsequent to the initial deferment.  The 
          notice of lien must contain a description of the property 
          and the names of all record owners of the property upon 
          which the taxes were deferred.  The county tax collector 
          shall index the lien according to the names of each record 
          owner and the county.  

          The bill requires the county tax collector or assessor, 
          upon receipt of the notice of lien, to enter on the notice 
          a description of the property and the names of all record 
          owners on the notice for the property for which taxes are 
          deferred, and to enter on the assessment records that the 
          taxes have been deferred.  The assessor shall immediately 
          forward the notice to the tax collector after the entry.  
          The assessor shall inform the tax collector of any changes 





          AB 1090 - 5/31/11 -- Page 5



          in ownership of the real property for which taxes are 
          deferred.  The tax collector shall maintain a record 
          containing specified information of all residential 
          dwellings against which he or she has filed a notice of 
          lien for deferred property taxes.

          The measure further requires the county to reduce the 
          amount secured by the lien by the amount of any payment, 
          and increase it to reflect interest accrual or subsequent 
          deferral for the claimant.  Payments shall be applied to 
          the oldest deferral amount in order of lien recordation 
          date.  If the lien is paid in full, the county tax 
          collector shall record a release with the county recorder 
          evidencing the satisfaction of all amounts secured by the 
          lien, and remove specified information from the secured 
          roll and assessment records required when property taxes 
          are postponed.  The amount of the lien increases to reflect 
          the accrual of interest.  

          AB 1090 provides that the taxes are immediately due and 
          payable if the claimant:
                 Dies
                 Ceases to own the building due to sale, conveyance, 
               or condemnation.
                 Ends his or her permanent residence dwelling.
                 Experiences a fall in equity value below the 
               program's eligibility criterion.
                 Refinances existing loans on the property.
                 Was erroneously granted deferment because he or she 
               did not meet eligibility criteria. 

          IV.   Limitations on Mortgagors  .  Current PTP law posits 
          that the postponement of property taxes under the state 
          program does not affect the obligation of a borrower to 
          make payments to a lender with respect to an impound, 
          trust, or other type of account established before 1978.  
          That law also precluded lenders from requiring the borrower 
          to maintain an impound, trust, or other type of account in 
          regard to taxes once the borrower chooses to postpone 
          taxes, unless required by federal law or regulation, in the 
          case of a mortgage guaranteed or insured by a federal 
          government lending or insurance agency, or if the 
          prohibition would impair the express obligations of a loan 
          agreement.  

          Assembly Bill 1090 enacts identical provisions for this 





          AB 1090 - 5/31/11 -- Page 6



          program, and further prohibits a mortgagee, trustee, or 
          other person authorized to take sale on real property as a 
          result of the mortgagor or trustor's failure to pay 
          property taxes from filing a notice of default if the 
          mortgagor or trustor shows evidence of participation in the 
          property tax postponement program.  The measure duplicates 
          this provision but states that a notice of default cannot 
          be filed for five years following the initial authorization 
          to take sale mortgagor or trustor shows evidence of 
          participation in the property tax postponement program.

          V.   Local Agency Investments  .  Since 1913, state law has 
          allowed local officials to invest their temporarily idle 
          funds in various financial instruments.  State law 
          originally limited these local investments to government 
          bonds, but over time legislators expanded the list to 
          include more sophisticated instruments.  The Legislature 
          limits the percentage of funds that a local agency can 
          invest in particular instruments.

          In 2002, the Legislature gave counties statutory 
          permission, until January 1, 2007, to put money into the 
          following high-quality, short-term investments (AB 2182, 
          Campbell, 2002): 

                 U.S. Treasury and federal obligations 
                 Federal agencies' bonds, notes, debenture, or 
               obligations. 
                 California registered state warrants, treasury 
               notes, or bonds. Local agencies' bonds, notes, 
               warrants, or other indebtedness. 
                 Banker's acceptances (bills of exchange, time 
               drafts) for international trade.
                 Short-term corporate promissory notes, or 
               commercial paper. 
                 Commercial banks' certificates of deposit. 
                 Repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase 
               agreements, or securities lending agreements. 
                 Corporate or bank debt securities, including 
               medium-term notes. 
                 Diversified management companies' shares of 
               beneficial interest. 
                 Mortgage pass-through securities, collateralized 
               mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed bonds, 
               lease-backed certificates, consumer receivable 
               pass-through certificates, or consumer 





          AB 1090 - 5/31/11 -- Page 7



               receivable-backed bonds. 
                 Insurance companies' contracts.

          Assembly Bill 1090 adds investments in the Property Tax 
          Deferral Fund in each county to the list of investments 
          that a county treasurer can invest in.


                               State Revenue Impact
           
          No estimate. 


                                     Comments  

          1.  Purpose of the bill  .  According to the Author, "For 
          more than 30 years, the state Senior Citizens and Disabled 
          Citizens Property Tax Postponement Program helped thousands 
          of low-income Californians remain in their homes by 
          postponing their property taxes.  Unfortunately, the 
          program was suspended with no warning in 2009, leaving 
          program participants no time to find alternative funding to 
          pay property taxes.  AB 1090 will help elderly and disabled 
          Californians stay in their homes by allowing counties to 
          establish a similar program.  Many former program 
          participants can afford their monthly mortgage payments, 
          but they do not have sufficient income to pay their 
          property taxes.  One past participant is Ms. Barbara 
          Kauffman, 75, of Studio City who has lived in her home for 
          25 years.      She relies solely on Social Security, and 
          after paying her $1,100 mortgage, little is left for food, 
          utilities, and medical expenses.  For seniors like Ms. 
          Kauffman, the property tax postponement program was a 
          lifeline, allowing them to stay in their homes and live a 
          dignified life.  AB 1090 will help protect our most 
          vulnerable citizens.

          2.   Timing is everything  .  ABx1 34 (Blumenfield) is 
          currently on the Governor's Desk, approved by the 
          Legislature two weeks ago.  That bill: 
           
                 Establishes the Senior Citizens and Disabled 
               Citizens Property Tax Postponement Fund within the 
               State Treasury and annually appropriates moneys in the 
               fund for the purposes of paying costs and 
               disbursements related to the postponement of property 





          AB 1090 - 5/31/11 -- Page 8



               taxes of eligible senior citizens and disabled 
               citizens.  
                 Requires the transfer of funds in excess of $10 
               million that accumulate in the Senior Citizens and 
               Disabled Citizens Property Tax Postponement Fund to 
               the General Fund and deletes any General Fund 
               appropriation for the program.  
                 Requires loan repayments relating to the Senior 
               Citizens and Disabled Citizens Property Tax 
               Postponement Law that are not deposited into the 
               program's impound account to be deposited directly 
               into the Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens 
               Property Tax Postponement Fund.  
                 Establishes that loan repayments relating to the 
               Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens Property Tax 
               Postponement Law that are deposited in the program's 
               impound account are transferred to the Senior Citizens 
               and Disabled Citizens Property Tax Postponement Fund 
               after a six-month period.  
                 Removes language that eliminates the consideration 
               of applications for the property tax postponement 
               program by the Controller and allows applications for 
               the property tax postponement program to be considered 
               beginning July 1, 2012

          Given that the bill currently on the Governor's Desk 
          resuscitates the PTP, and that local treasurers are 
          reluctant to participate in this bill's program without 
          super priority lien status (see Comment 4), what's the 
          reason to approve AB 1090?  The Author states that ABX1  
          34's $10 million won't meet existing demand, and a 
          local-option program will help people who need assistance 
          but won't get it due to the $10 million cap.  The Committee 
          may wish to consider deferring action on this bill until 
          the Governor acts.

          3.   Do It Yourself  .  For many years, the Senior Citizens 
          and Disabled Citizens Property Tax Postponement Program 
          helped individuals who were unable to make property tax 
          payments stall foreclosure by securing unpaid amounts in a 
          tax lien, which was satisfied with the proceeds of a 
          subsequent sale of the property.  According to the 
          Controller's Office, over the last 30 years, the program 
          has provided property tax postponement assistance to more 
          than 200,000 homeowners.  However, with the Legislature 
          shuttering the program in 2009 due to its escalating costs 





          AB 1090 - 5/31/11 -- Page 9



          and declining revenues, existing participants can no longer 
          defer taxes, thereby requiring them to pay property taxes 
          for the first time since enrolling in the program, and no 
          new participants can be enrolled.

          AB 1090 revises the program to be elective for counties.  
          Under the bill, counties can enact an ordinance 
          participating in the program, set aside funds, accept 
          claims, and defer taxes for eligible claimants.  The County 
          Auditor allocates the revenue to other local agencies such 
          as cities, special districts, and school districts using 
          county revenue as if the tax had been paid until the house 
          is sold and the lien can be satisfied.  The county opt-in 
          program largely relies on eligibility criteria used for the 
          state program, with some updates, and even allows counties 
          to grant retroactive relief for individuals who could not 
          obtain deferment when the Legislature defunded the program 
          and precluded claimants from filing new claims.  Whereas 
          the former program used state general funds to benefit 
          eligible individuals anywhere in the state, AB 1090 gives 
          counties willing to use its own money the option to 
          continue deferring taxes for property owners within the 
          participating county.

          4.   Lien on me  ?  Under existing law, tax liens are payable 
          in the order in which they are filed.  For example, if the 
          Internal Revenue Service files a lien against a home for a 
          taxpayer delinquent on income taxes, the lien is repaid 
          after the lien filed by the mortgage company if the 
          property owner fell behind on their mortgage payments 
          first.  In California, a property tax lien payable to 
          counties automatically jumps to the front of the line, 
          known as "super priority status."  The Controller did not 
          enjoy under the super priority status under prior law, 
          leading to its negative cash flow when the housing market 
          soured.  As introduced, AB 1090 conferred similar treatment 
          to liens that secure a claimant's deferred property taxes, 
          much to the angst of other lienholders, such as financial 
          institutions or investors who hold mortgages and other 
          credit instruments secured by a lien on the home.  The May 
          31st amendments deleted the super priority status, instead 
          allowing the tax collector to file a judgment lien against 
          the property, which is paid out of sales proceeds only 
          after previously filed liens are satisfied.

          So-called "super priority" lien status ensures that the 





          AB 1090 - 5/31/11 -- Page 10



          county will be repaid when the house is sold by requiring 
          its lien be paid out of sale proceeds first, an important 
          security feature in these days of negative equity.  The 
          super priority status substantially reduces the risk that 
          the claimant will not repay the County for property taxes.  
          Without that status, will counties participate in the 
          program given their fiduciary duties to taxpayers only to 
          invest in secure instruments?  The Committee may wish to 
          consider whether allowing local treasurer-tax collectors to 
          defer property taxes with the sole security of a 
          last-in-line lien is a smart investment, or whether the 
          bill will set up a program that no counties will choose to 
          use. 

          5.   Renewing Acquaintances  .  Last year, the former Revenue 
          and Taxation Committee and the Legislature approved AB 1718 
          (Blumenfield), which is substantially similar to this bill, 
          except that measure allows treasurer-tax collectors to 
          secure the deferral with lien that has super priority 
          status.  Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed the measure, 
          stating: 

               "The goal of this bill is laudable.  However, the bill 
               inappropriately grants counties a super priority lien 
               on a participating senior or disabled individual's 
               residential property.  Not only would an individual's 
               participation in a county program violate their 
               mortgage
               contract, it would most likely render them unable to 
               obtain future loans.

               I believe that the lending and mortgage industry agree 
               with the intent of this measure.  The author would be 
               well-served by working with them and the counties next 
               year to craft a solution that provides a workable and 
               legally acceptable tax deferral program for
               seniors and disabled individuals struggling to 
               maintain their residential property."


                                 Assembly Actions  

          Assembly Revenue and Taxation   5-2
          Assembly Appropriations            11-5
          Assembly Floor                75-0






          AB 1090 - 5/31/11 -- Page 11




                        Support and Opposition  (6/30/11)
                                   
           Support  :  AARP California; California Association of 
          Realtors; California Senior Legislature; California State 
          Association of Counties.

           Opposition  :  Unknown.