BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1151
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 18, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                     AB 1151 (Feuer) - As Amended:  May 5, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Judiciary 
          Committee    Vote:                            9-0
                        PERS Committee                        6-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill amends the California Public Divest from Iran Act to 
          clarify that the boards of CalPERS and CalSTRS must divest 
          pension funds, as specified, unless to do so would breach a 
          fiduciary duty.  Specifically, this bill:  

          1)Expands the criteria for companies that have business 
            operations in Iran, which would then be subject to 
            disinvestment by the boards of CalPERS and CalSTRS.  The 
            criteria added by the bill are companies that have an 
            investment of $20 million or more in the energy sector of 
            Iran, as specified.  Eliminates existing exemptions from the 
            California Public Divest from Iran Act for companies engaged 
            in certain humanitarian, educational, religious, journalistic 
            or welfare activities.  

          2)Requires the board to annually review its investment portfolio 
            based on publicly available information.

          3)Requires that board determinations as to whether a company is 
            subject to divestment be based on credible information 
            available to the public and supported by findings adopted by a 
            roll call vote in open session during a properly noticed 
            public hearing of the full board.  

          4)Provides that if a company fails to take substantial action, 
            as defined, within one year, then the board shall not renew or 
            make additional investments in that company and shall 
            liquidate investments in this company within 18 months.









                                                                  AB 1151
                                                                  Page  2

          5)Specifies that nothing in this bill would require the board to 
            take an action pursuant to the above provisions if the board 
            determines, in good faith, that an action would be a breach of 
            the fiduciary responsibilities of the board as described in 
            the California constitution. 


           FISCAL EFFECT  

          CalPERS estimates the costs of implementing the provisions of AB 
          1151 are an additional $850,000 to $1,275,000 because the bill 
          would have the Board of Administration hold hearings, make 
          determinations and produce a report on a quarterly instead of 
          annual basis.  Ongoing monitoring costs under existing law are 
          approximately $550,000 annually for CalPERS staff costs and 
          external fiduciary counsel and this amount is not expected to 
          change.  

           COMMENTS  

           1.Purpose.   According to the authors, even though existing law 
            requires California public pension funds to divest from 
            companies doing business with Iran, "CalPERS continues to 
            invest in companies with interests in Iran and has failed to 
            satisfactorily comply with statutorily mandated reporting 
            requirements to the Legislature."  The authors point to a 2010 
            legislative oversight hearing showing that CalPERS has 
            "increased investments in several energy companies doing 
            business in Iran, while decreasing investments in other energy 
            companies that do not do business with Iran."  In addition, 
            the authors contend the CalPERS required report to the 
            Legislature failed to adequately explain why CalPERS continues 
            to invest in companies that do business with Iran.  

           2.Constitutional Requirements  .  Section 17 of Article XVI of the 
            California Constitution, as amended by Proposition 162 in 
            1992, provides that the boards of California's public 
            retirement systems have "plenary authority and fiduciary 
            responsibility for investment of monies and administration of 
            the system."  This section also states that the "members of 
            the retirement board of a public pension or retirement system 
            shall discharge their duties with respect to the system solely 
            in the interest of, and for the exclusive purposes of 
            providing benefits to, participants and their beneficiaries."  
            However, this section is equally clear that the Legislature 








                                                                  AB 1151
                                                                  Page  3

            retains its authority to "prohibit certain investments by a 
            retirement board where it is in the public interest to do so, 
            and provided that the prohibition satisfies the standards of 
            fiduciary care and loyalty required of a retirement board."
          
          3.Background: the California Public Divest from Iran Act of 
            2007  .   AB 221 (Anderson, Chapter 671, Statutes of 2007) 
            enacted the California Public Divest from Iran Act.  This 
            legislation prohibits the boards of CalPERS and CalSTRS from 
            investing public employee retirement funds in companies that 
            have specified energy- or defense-related operations in Iran.  
            In addition, AB 221 required the boards to independently 
            review publicly available information regarding companies with 
            business operations in Iran and, based on that review, to 
            notify such companies that they must take "substantial action" 
            to reduce or eliminate investments in Iran or face the 
            prospect of withdrawal of public pension funds.  If the 
            company fails to satisfactorily take substantial action within 
            a year, then the boards of CalPERS and CalSTRS are required to 
            liquidate investments in that company within 18 months.
           
          4.Federal Law Background  :  For more than a decade the United 
            States government has condemned the government of Iran for its 
            support of international terrorism, human rights violations 
            and efforts to develop nuclear weapons in defiance of the 
            international community.  Although federal law has for some 
            time prohibited American companies from engaging in specified 
            business practices with Iran, it has no similar power to ban 
            the actions of foreign companies.  However, the United States 
            does have the power to penalize foreign companies by denying 
            them certain advantages of U.S. law.  As such, the key 
            provisions of the Iran Sanctions Act require the president to 
            impose two of seven possible sanctions on foreign persons or 
            companies that make an investment of more than $20 million in 
            Iran's energy sector.
           
          5.Support  .  The bill is supported by several human rights 
            organizations.  For example, the Simon Wiesenthal Center 
            argues that this bill "would increase accountability by 
            requiring that any determination that an action would breach a 
            fiduciary duty be done by a roll call vote of the board, 
            following a presentation and discussion of the findings in 
            open session, during a properly noticed public hearing of the 
            full board."  In addition, the Simon Wiesenthal Center argues 
            that this bill, coming from a key American state, "will send a 








                                                                  AB 1151
                                                                  Page  4

            message to the long-suffering people of Iran that Californians 
            stand with their quest for freedom and will not, under any 
            circumstances, help to prop up an evil regime that threats the 
            region and oppresses its own people."
           
          6.Opposition  .  CalSTRS opposes the bill stating, "This measure 
            would require the board to potentially compromise its 
            fiduciary responsibility and infringe on its investment 
            authority.  Requiring investment decisions to be made in a 
            public hearing could adversely affect the market conditions 
            for those investments, resulting in harm to the value of those 
            investments and a negative impact to the Teachers' Retirement 
            Fund."

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081