BILL ANALYSIS Ó
AB 1182
Page 1
GOVERNOR'S VETO
AB 1182 (Roger Hernández)
As Amended August 22, 2011
2/3 vote
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: |55-17|(May 12, 2011) |SENATE: |23-15|(September 6, |
| | | | | |2011) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: |52-25|(September 8, | | | |
| | |2011) | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Original Committee Reference: HUM. S.
SUMMARY : Deletes the requirement that county welfare
departments assess the value of a vehicle when determining and
re-determining eligibility for applicants and recipients of
California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids program
(CalWORKs).
The Senate amendments add co-authors and make technical,
non-substantive changes to the bill.
EXISTING LAW imposes limits on the amount of income and personal
and real property an individual or family may possess in order
to be eligible for aid under the CalWORKs program, including
that assets shall not exceed the following:
1)$2,000 in savings and $3,000 for a family with a member age 60
or above;
2)One house that the family lives in;
3)One car with a value of $4,650 or less; and,
4)Savings and interests in restricted federally qualified
accounts for the purpose of saving for college, retirement,
AB 1182
Page 2
starting a business, purchasing a home, or overcoming an
episode of homelessness.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill was exactly the same.
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee:
1)On-going savings in the CalWORKs program of $4 million
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families/maintenance of effort
(TANF/MOE) per year.
a) Grant cost of $800,000 (TANF/MOE) for 2011-2012,
increasing to $5.7 million (TANF/MOE) in 2012-13 onward due
to an increased CalWORKs caseload.
b) Savings of $5 million (TANF/MOE) in 2011-2012, growing
to $9.7 million (TANF/MOE) in 2012-2013 and beyond due to
reduced administrative workload.
2)Actual administrative savings would likely be less as the
CalWORKs program has not received funding increases to keep
pace with actual operations costs since 2001. In addition,
county welfare departments have sustained hundreds of millions
of dollars of cuts over the last several years, including a
cut of $425 million to CalWORKs administration and services
for the coming year alone. However, reducing the workload
associated with CalWORKs eligibility could help relieve the
funding pressures faced by county welfare departments.
COMMENTS : The author seeks to encourage CalWORKs families to
build their personal savings and asset accumulation in order to
become self-reliant and end their dependence on government
assistance. An additional goal is to reduce the administrative
burden on local welfare agencies by streamlining the application
process, simplifying the program rules, decreasing paperwork and
cutting down on county time that would be better served on the
other human services programs it is entrusted by the state to
administer. Indeed, since 2001, counties have been underfunded
for their cost of doing business by $1.2 billion.
AB 1182
Page 3
To accomplish this, this bill would modify the following
CalWORKs state eligibility rules by
eliminating the requirement that each family have a vehicle
worth no more than $4,650.
Asset building for CalWORKs : According to the New America
Foundation, a think tank that advances policy initiatives such
as asset building for low-income families, "For families making
the difficult transition from welfare-to-work, developing assets
is critical to achieving true economic independence. In order
to prevent a complete backslide to public assistance, low income
working families must begin to develop their own safety nets
through personal saving for use in the event of an unexpected
income shock due to illness or temporary employment. As
personal saving is essential to achieving self-sufficiency, the
stated goal of the CalWORKs program, saving should be
encouraged, not penalized, by welfare policy and social service
agencies." At present, applicants and recipients of the
CalWORKs program find their progress restricted by an asset
limit which restricts families to no more than $2,000 in savings
and one car with a value of no more than $4,650.
Asset limits are doing more harm than good for three reasons:
1) inefficient: because counties are forced to administer a
complex asset test on low-income households that studies have
shown are without assets; 2) counterproductive: because
achieving economic security requires the accumulation of
savings; and, assets limits discourage families from building
their savings; and, 3) inequitable: because they completely
exclude families who have only slightly more economic resources
from participation than families who are currently eligible for
the benefits.
Michael Sherraden writes in his 1991 book, Assets and the Poor,
"For the vast majority of households, pathway out of poverty is
not through consumption, but through savings and accumulation.
Simply stated, not many people manage to spend their way out of
poverty."
This bill would eliminate the vehicle asset test in its entirety
from consideration for eligibility into the CalWORKs program and
AB 1182
Page 4
at annual redeterminations.
Case for eliminating the vehicle test :
1)The vehicle test was last increased 15 years ago.
Other states: According to the author, California is currently
tied with Texas and Idaho in having the most restrictive asset
test for vehicles of any state in the country. The following
is the vehicle asset policy of the rest of the nation:
a) 12 states exclude all vehicles owned by the household;
b) 15 exclude at least one vehicle per household; and,
c) 20 have substantially increased the value of the vehicle
exclusion.
In comparison, California employs a much more restrictive
vehicle asset test. The author states that this policy
undermines a worker's ability to gain and maintain employment,
thereby encouraging continued reliance on public assistance.
1)Streamlining and program alignment: Counties administer the
CalFresh, MediCal, and CalWORKs programs and most, if not all,
of those programs serve the same client. Despite the obvious
streamlining that could occur by eliminating the vehicle test,
it has remained a part of CalWORKs eligibility.
2)Transportation is a primary barrier to employment: Lastly, a
recent report by the County of Los Angeles on the
transportation barriers faced by low-income families concludes
that "car ownership is strongly correlated with employment
status, and increases the likelihood of employment." The
study found that welfare-to-work recipients without a vehicle
were 31% more likely to indicate that they face difficulty in
seeking work, while those with a vehicle were 20% more likely
to be gainfully employed.
GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE :
AB 1182
Page 5
This bill would allow a person applying for welfare to
have one car, or possibly more, of any value, rather
than a maximum of $4,650 under current law.
In the last year, the state has been forced to make
steep reductions in many programs, including the
state's welfare-to-work program. As we go into the
new year, we may have to make additional cuts. Until
we better understand the fiscal outlook, we should not
be making changes of this kind.
Analysis Prepared by : Frances Chacon / HUM. S. / (916)
319-2089
FN:
0002927