BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1272
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 12, 2011

              ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND CONSUMER 
                                     PROTECTION
                                 Mary Hayashi, Chair
                 AB 1272 (Butler) - As Introduced:  February 18, 2011
           
          SUBJECT  :   State property: surplus.

           SUMMARY  :   Authorizes the Department of General Services (DGS) 
          to dispose of all or any portion of six specified parcels of 
          state property, and rescinds the surplus authorization of two 
          specified properties.
          
          1)Authorizes DGS to dispose of all or any portion of the 
            following six specified parcels of state property: 

             a)   Approximately 2.59 acres, known as the Hollywood 
               Employment Development Department (EDD) Office Building, 
               located at 1116 N. McCadden Place and 6725 Santa Monica 
               Blvd., in Los Angeles (L.A.), L.A. County; 

             b)   Approximately 1.68 acres, known as the L.A. EDD Office 
               Building, located at 1405 South Broadway and 1400 South 
               Hill Street, in L.A., L.A. County;

             c)   Approximately 1.17 acres, known as the Oroville EDD 
               Office Building, located at 2348 Baldwin Avenue, in 
               Oroville, Butte County; 

             d)   Approximately 1.54 acres, known as the Hidden Lakes 
               Estates Parcel, located near the Millerton Lake State 
               Recreation Area, in Fresno County; 

             e)   Approximately 40 acres, known as the Digger Butte 
               Lookout, located in an unincorporated area of Tehama 
               County, 39 miles northeast of Red Bluff, portion of Section 
               29, T.30N., R.2E., M.D.M., Tehama County; and,

             f)   Approximately 20 acres, known as the Campbellville 
               Lookout, located in an unincorporated area of Tehama 
               County, 20 miles north of Chico, portion of Section 14, 
               T.25N., R.2E, M.D.M., Tehama County.
               
          2)Rescinds the surplus authorization of the following two 








                                                                  AB 1272
                                                                  Page  2

            specified properties: 

             a)   Approximately 0.54 acres of a portion of the Sutter Hill 
               Forest Fire Station, located one mile south of Sutter Creek 
               on Highway 49 in Amador County, declared surplus in SB 1645 
               (Mountjoy), Chapter 731, Statutes of 1998; and, 

             b)   Approximately 5.54 acres, known as the National Guard 
               Armory, located at 251 West Hedding Street in the City of 
               San Jose, Santa Clara County, declared surplus in SB 2713 
               (Wyman), Chapter 1384, Statutes of 1984.
          
           EXISTING LAW : 

          1)Authorizes DGS to develop and review an inventory of property 
            surplus to the needs of the state in portions or their 
            entirety, and allows DGS, subject to legislative approval, to 
            sell, lease, exchange, or transfer various specified 
            properties for current market value, or upon terms and 
            conditions as DGS determines are in the best interests of the 
            state.

          2)Establishes criteria for state agencies to use in determining 
            and reporting excess lands.  Requires a state agency to 
            include: 

             a)   Land not currently being utilized, or being 
               underutilized, for any existing or ongoing program; 

             b)   Land for which the agency has not identified any 
               specific utilization relative to future needs; and, 

             c)   Land not identified by the state agency within its 
               master plan for facility development.

          3)Exempts the sale of surplus property from designated 
            provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 
             Specifically, the law provides that any disposition surplus 
            property made on an "as-is" basis shall be exempt from 
            statutory requirements of CEQA.  However, the law makes it 
            explicit that the buyer or transferee of a parcel shall be 
            subject to any local governmental entitlement or land use 
            approval requirements and CEQA.  

          4)Requires, pursuant to Proposition 60A of November 2004, SCA 18 








                                                                  AB 1272
                                                                  Page  3

            (Johnson), Chapter 103, Resolutions of 2004, that the proceeds 
            from the sale of surplus state property, with specified 
            exceptions, be used to pay the principal and interest on the 
            Economic Recovery Bond Act of 2004.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown 

           COMMENTS  :   

           Purpose of this bill  .  According to the author's office, "This 
          is the annual DGS proposal for the disposal of excess state real 
          property.  State agencies are required by Government Code 
          Section 11011 to identify real properties that are excess to its 
          needs.  The proposal is necessary because legislative 
          authorization is needed to declare real properties as surplus 
          and to authorize their disposal by DGS."

           Background  .  This measure is the annual surplus property bill 
          sponsored by DGS.  Existing law requires all state agencies to 
          annually review and determine if any lands under their 
          jurisdiction are in excess of need.  This information is 
          provided to DGS to annually report to the Legislature the excess 
          lands and request authorization to sell excess land.   When 
          selling state surplus property, DGS must determine if other 
          state agencies can utilize the land.   If the state has no need, 
          DGS must then offer surplus state real property to local 
          agencies, and next, to nonprofit affordable housing sponsors 
          prior to offering the property to private entities.  

          Under the provisions of Proposition 60A, the proceeds of the 
          sale of surplus property must be used to pay the holders of the 
          state's deficit reduction bonds.  These payments are intended to 
          accelerate the redemption of the state's debt, and reduce future 
          General Fund payments to the bondholders.

           Declaration of Surplus Property  .  Below are DGS's reasons for 
          declaring the following properties surplus: 
          
           1)Hollywood EDD Building  :  The 29,000 square feet property was 
            acquired on January 13, 1949 for $59,247, including through 
            condemnation.  A 2001 appraisal gave a value of $4.68 million. 
             Because EDD utilizes federal funds, there is federal equity 
            in this property that would have to be repaid.  This facility 
            needs major improvements and is no longer meeting the needs of 
            the program.  








                                                                 AB 1272
                                                                  Page  4


          2)Los Angeles EDD Building  :  The property was acquired in 
            several acquisitions including condemnation in 1962.  The 
            total cost of the land was $568,480 and the total building 
            cost was $574,546.  Because EDD utilizes federal funds, there 
            is federal equity in this property that would have to be 
            repaid (potentially up to 94% federal equity).  This facility 
            needs major improvements and is no longer meeting the needs of 
            the program. 

          3)Oroville EDD Office Building  :  EDD acquired the property in 
            1968 at a cost of $43,658.86 and constructed the 5,121 square 
            foot stand-alone building at a cost of $287,076 for use as an 
            EDD field office.  EDD can no longer justify a building of 
            this size due to the permanent reduction in staffing.  EDD 
            intends to administer the current program and services from a 
            different EDD location.   

          4)Hidden Lakes Estates  :  The Department of Parks and Recreation 
            (DPR) acquired the property in 1965 to construct a boat access 
            and ramp to provide the Hidden Lakes Estates development 
            community access to Millerton Lake.  The access and ramp were 
            never constructed.  The parcel is not contiguous with the 
            State Recreation Area and DPR cannot patrol, secure, or 
            maintain the property on a regular basis.  The homeowners who 
            agreed to maintain the property have abandoned the effort and 
            the DPR is unable to maintain or secure the parcel at this 
            remote location.  The ownership of the parcel creates an 
            unnecessary liability for the State of California.  

          5)Digger Butte Lookout  : The Department of Forestry and Fire 
            Protection (CAL FIRE) acquired the property in 1971 to 
            construct a fire lookout tower.  CAL FIRE is not using the 
            property for fire protection purposes and has no future use 
            planned.  

          6)Campbellville Lookout  : CAL FIRE acquired the property in 1971 
            to construct a fire lookout tower.  CAL FIRE is not using the 
            property for fire protection purposes and has no future use 
            planned.  
           
           Rescission of Surplus Property .  This proposal rescinds two 
          state properties from being declared surplus.  This often 
          happens when the controlling agency revisits their program needs 
          and identifies a use for the property.  State properties that 








                                                                  AB 1272
                                                                  Page  5

          should be rescinded cannot have the designation of "surplus" 
          removed until legislation is chaptered.  In practice, even if a 
          property has been declared surplus, if the controlling 
          department contacts DGS and requests a rescission, the property 
          is not put on the market.  While the designation of "surplus" is 
          not removed from the property, the property is not available to 
          sell.  DGS received requests from the client agencies to rescind 
          two properties: 

           1)Sutter Hill Forest Fire Station  under the control of CAL FIRE, 
            consisting of approximately 0.54 acres.  This is a portion of 
            the parking lot for a Fire Station and the county, who 
            originally wished to purchased, instead, garnered a parking 
            lot easement, thus alleviating their need for purchase.

           2)San Jose Armory  under the control of the Military Department 
            (MD) consisting of approximately 5.54 acres.  The property is 
            used on a full-time basis and fully staffed.  MD has requested 
            this proposal in the past, but has been unable to attain 
            rescission.

           Previous Legislation  . 

          SB 1167 (Cogdill), Chapter 324, Statutes of 2010, authorized DGS 
          to dispose of specified parcels of surplus state property, 
          sponsored as part of DGS's annual bill.  

          SB 136 (Huff), Chapter 166, Statutes of 2009, authorized DGS to 
          dispose of specified parcels of surplus state property.

          AB 53 (Negrete McLeod) of 2006 would have authorized DGS to 
          dispose of specified parcels of surplus state property.  This 
          bill was held on the Senate Floor. 

          AB 54 (Negrete McLeod) of 2005 would have authorized DGS to 
          dispose of specified parcels of surplus state property.  This 
          bill was vetoed due to provisions in the bill requiring DGS to 
          initiate a CEQA process on the properties. 

          SB 856 (Committee on Governmental Organization), Chapter 258, 
          Statutes of 2003, authorized DGS to dispose of specified parcels 
          of surplus state property. 

          SB 1607 (Committee on Governmental Organization), Chapter 974, 
          Statutes of 2002, authorized DGS to dispose of specified parcels 








                                                                  AB 1272
                                                                  Page  6

          of surplus state property.  

          SB 951 (Committee on Governmental Organization), Chapter 610, 
          Statutes of 2001, authorized DGS to dispose of specified parcels 
          of surplus state property.

           Support  .  According to the sponsor, DGS, "AB 1272 is the annual 
          omnibus DGS legislative measure for the management of surplus 
          state real property.  This bill is necessary to authorize the 
          sale of excess properties identified by state agencies.  
          Existing law requires all state agencies to annually review all 
          proprietary state lands, except as specified, and determine if 
          any lands are in excess of their needs and report the 
          information to DGS.  In turn, DGS is required to annually report 
          to the Legislature the land declared excess and request 
          legislative authorization to declare property surplus.  DGS then 
          provides due diligence for the disposal of the land by sale or 
          otherwise."

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Department of General Services (sponsor)

           
          Opposition 
           
          None on file. 
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Joanna Gin / B.,P. & C.P. / (916) 
          319-3301