BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1302
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 18, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 1302 (Williams) - As Amended:  May 10, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              UtilitiesVote:9-2

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires electrical utilities to designate areas 
          within their service areas as optimal for deployment of 
          distributed generation (DG). Specifically, this bill:

          1)Requires the California Energy Commission (CEC), in 
            consultation with the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), to 
            develop guidelines for investor-owned electrical utilities 
            (IOUs) and publicly-owned electrical utilities (POUs) having 
            at least 75,000 retail customers to identify and designate 
            zones for optimal deployment of distributed generation (DG).

          2)Requires, by December 31, 2012, that the IOUs provide the CEC, 
            the PUC and the Independent System Operator (ISO) and the POUs 
            provide the CEC and the ISO with information specified per 
            (2), and requires the CEC to review and approve or indicate 
            needed revisions to the information provided.

          3)Requires the CEC, if an IOU or POU does not provide the above 
            information by the deadline, to itself designate the DG zones 
            and charge the IOU or POU a fee to cover the CEC's costs for 
            this work.

          4)Requires the IOUs and POUs, upon approval by the CEC per (3), 
            to periodically update DG zones, provide this information to 
            the CEC, and post the information on the IOU/POU website.

          5)Requires state agencies to give priority for approval of DG 
            projects proposed with a zone designated by the above process.

           FISCAL EFFECT  









                                                                  AB 1302
                                                                  Page  2

          1)The Energy Commission would require two positions at a cost of 
            $210,000 to facilitate coordination with the IOUs and the POUs 
            to develop guidelines, review, approve or provide 
            recommendations to their proposed DG optimal designation 
            zones, and to ensure that this information is publicly posted 
            on each utility's website. �Energy Resources Programs Account]

          2)The PUC would require one senior analyst position at special 
            fund cost of $115,000 to consult with the CEC in developing 
            the guidelines. �Public Utilities Reimbursement Account]

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . Distributed generation refers to electric generation 
            facilities located close to the point of electricity 
            consumption.  DG can be renewable energy (such as solar or 
            wind), fuel cells powered by natural gas or biogas.  These 
            projects usually do not require large amounts of land and most 
            can be co-located on existing developed property (such as a 
            parking lot or building roof). DG systems connect to the 
            electricity grid via the local transmission or distribution 
            system, and can be constructed in a manner that either allows 
            all of the power to be sent to the electricity grid or to 
            first serve on-site electricity needs and send only excess 
            electricity to the grid. The author argues that the State must 
            have an understanding of the optimal areas for distributed 
            generation in California within areas served by investor owned 
            utilities and public utilities.

           2)Opposition  . PG&E indicates that electrical distribution 
            systems are dynamic; systems change, new devices and new loads 
            are added, and different types and sizes of DG are 
            incorporated. In addition, they point out that DG technologies 
            themselves create unknown variables, such as whether they are 
            mechanical or inverter based systems, how they potentially 
            interact with each other and the existing electrical system. 
            Since that the electric grid is an "ever-changing" system, 
            PG&E questions whether the maps will ultimately be useful.
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081