BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1359
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   January 19, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                  AB 1359 (Skinner) - As Amended:  January 4, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              Natural 
          ResourcesVote:9-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill makes numerous technical, but, in some cases, 
          substantive, changes to the state's beverage container recycling 
          program.  Most significantly, this bill:

          1)Deletes reference to the "redemption rate" and requirements 
            related to its calculation.

          2)Authorizes a beverage manufacturer to make one processing fee 
            payment to the department, instead of periodic payments, if 
            the manufacturer has displayed a pattern of compliance to the 
            department's satisfaction and the processor's projected annual 
            fees are less than $15,000.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Negligible costs, if any.

          COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  This bill seeks to make changes to the statutes 
            governing the "bottle bill" program to delete obsolete 
            references, clarify existing law or codify existing practice.  
            For example, the bill deletes reference to the redemption 
            rate, which refers to the percentage of beverage containers of 
            all types sold that subsequently are turned in for recycling.  
            In the early years of the beverage container recycling 
            program, certain higher payments were triggered by specified 
            redemption rates, which statute required Calrecycle to track 
            and report.  Statute no longer bases fee amounts on the 
            redemption rate, but nonetheless requires Calrecycle to track 








                                                                  AB 1359
                                                                  Page  2

            and report on that rate.

            The author also indicates she intends this bill to be a 
            vehicle available to address problems with the bottle bill 
            program should any come to light during the next several 
            months.

           2)Background.  The Division of Recycling (DOR) within the 
            Department of Recycling and Resources Recovery (Calrecycle) 
            administers the Beverage Container Recycling Program, commonly 
            referred to as the "bottle bill" program.  This program was 
            created more than 20 years ago by Chapter 1290, Statutes of 
            1986 (AB 2020, Margolin). The program encourages the voluntary 
            recycling of most beverage containers by guaranteeing a 
            minimum payment (the California Redemption Value (CRV)) for 
            each container returned to a certified recycler. Beverage 
            containers are subject to the CRV based on both the content of 
            the container (the beverage type, such as water or sports 
            drinks) and the container material (such as glass or plastic).  
             Several years ago, the fund into which CRV deposits are 
            made-the Beverage Container Recycling Fund-had fund balances 
            that exceeded the yearly cost of the bottle bill program by 
            tens of millions of dollars. This is because Californians 
            recycled beverage containers at a rate well below 80%-the rate 
            at which payments into the fund would equal payments out of 
            the fund.  Much of the excess funds went to pay for programs 
            to support recycling.  In addition, the excess fund balance 
            was repeatedly loaned, first to the General Fund and then to 
            the Air Pollution Control Fund to pay for implementation of 
            the state's greenhouse gas emissions reduction efforts.

            More recently, recycling rates have increased well above 80%.  
            At the same time, purchases of beverage containers subject to 
            the CRV have declined.  As a result, the BCRF was unable to 
            support the programs intended to facilitate recycling.  Some 
            anticipate the bottle bill program will soon experience 
            additional funding shortfalls.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081