BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 1364
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 18, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 1364 (Campos) - As Amended: April 4, 2011
Policy Committee: Labor and
Employment Vote: 5-0
Arts 8-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill prohibits any talent agency licensee from refusing to
represent any artist on account of that artist's ancestry,
marital status, or sexual orientation.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor, absorbable costs to enforce this measure.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . Talent agencies are generally defined as a person or
corporation that procures employment for artists. While they
are not employers, agents play a role in the hiring of actors,
writers, directors and other talent. The activities of talent
agents are regulated by the Labor Commissioner, who issues
licenses for agents. Current license requirements specify
that agents may not discriminate against persons seeking
representation.
Information provided by the author contends some talent
agencies colluded with television networks and movie studios
to discriminate against writers over the age of 40, in
violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act and the Fair
Employment and Housing Act. �Alch v Superior Court (2004) 122
Cal. App. 4th 339.] The resulting lawsuit gave rise to a $70
million dollar settlement on behalf of the writers.
According to the author, "In order to provide clarity and
prevent future lawsuits, this bill would update the Talent
AB 1364
Page 2
Agencies Act (TAA) to expressly include certain categories of
employment protections under the Unruh Civil Rights Act."
2)Existing law , under the TAA, prohibits any talent agency from
refusing to represent any artist on account of their sex,
race, color, creed, religion, or handicap.
Analysis Prepared by : Kimberly Rodriguez / APPR. / (916)
319-2081